Skip to main content
Log in

Oviposition choices by a pre-dispersal seed predator (Hylemya sp.)

II. A positive association between female choice and fruit set

  • Original Papers
  • Published:
Oecologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Pre-dispersal seed predators must choose proper hosts and flowers on those hosts that have a high probability of setting seed. In this study, I documented that flowers of Ipomopsis aggregata (Polemoniaceae) chosen by a pre-dispersal seed predator (Anthomyiidae: Hylemya sp.) had a higher probability of seed set than flowers the fly did not choose. I experimentally tested the hypothesis that Hylemya uses a post-fertilization cue in making oviposition choices. I found no evidence for this hypothesis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andersen AN (1988) Insect seed predators may cause far greater losses than they appear to. Oikos 52:337–340

    Google Scholar 

  • Augsburger CK (1981) Reproductive synchrony of a tropical shrub: experimental studies on effects of pollinators and seed predators on Hybanthus prunifolius (Violaceae). Ecology 62:775–788

    Google Scholar 

  • Brantjes NBM (1976) Senses involved in the visiting of flowers by Cucullia umbratica (Noctuidae, Lepidoptera). Ent Exp Appl 20:1–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Brody AK (1992) Oviposition choices by a pre-dispersal seed predator (Hylemya sp.) I. Correspondence with hummingbird pollinators, and the role of plant size, density and floral morphology. Oecologia 91:56–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell DR (1989) Measurements of selection in a hermaphroditic plant: variation in male and female pollination success. Evolution 43:318–334

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell (1991) Effects of floral traits on sequential components of fitness in Ipomopsis aggregata. Am Nat 137:713–737

    Google Scholar 

  • De Steven D (1983) Reproductive consequences of insect seed predation in Hamamelis virginiana Ecology 64:89–98

    Google Scholar 

  • Feeny P, Rosenberry L, Carter M (1983) Chemical aspects of oviposition behavior in butterflies. In: Ahmad S (ed) Herbivorous Insects: Host-seeking behavior and mechanisms, Academic Press, New York pp 27–76

    Google Scholar 

  • Hainsworth FR, Wolf LL, Mercier T (1985) Pollen limitation in a monocarpic species, Ipomopsis aggregata. J Ecol 73:263–270

    Google Scholar 

  • Janzen DH (1971a) Seed predation by animals. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 2:465–492

    Google Scholar 

  • Janzen DH (1971b) Cassia grandis L beans and their escape from predators: A study in tropical predator satiation. Ecology 52:964–979

    Google Scholar 

  • Janzen DH (1976) Why bamboos wait so long to flower. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 7:347–391

    Google Scholar 

  • Louda SM (1982) Limitations of the recruitment of the shrub Haplopappus squarrosus (Asteraceae) by flower-and seedfeeding insects. J Ecol 68:929–952

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackay DA, Jones RE (1989) Leaf shape and host-finding behavior of two ovipositing monophagous butterfly species. Ecol Entomol 14:423–431

    Google Scholar 

  • Moericke V, Prokopy RJ, Berlocher S, Bush GL (1975) Visual stimuli eliciting attraction of Rhagoletis pomonella flies to trees. Entomol Exp Appl 18:497–507

    Google Scholar 

  • Papaj DR (1986) Conditioning of leaf-shape discrimination by chemical cues in the butterfly, Battus philenor. Anim Behav 34:1281–1288

    Google Scholar 

  • Pedhazur EJ (1982) Multiple regression in behavioral research. Holt Rinehart and Winston Fort Worth pp 822

    Google Scholar 

  • Prokopy RJ, Owens ED (1983) Visual detection of plants by herbivorous insects. Ann Rev Entomol 28: 337–364

    Google Scholar 

  • Rausher MD, Mackay DA, Singer MC (1981) Pre-and post-alighting host discrimination by Euphydryas editha butterflies: the behavioral mechanisms causing clumped distributions of egg clusters. Anim Behav 29:1220–1228

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson AI, Giddins R, Smith TJ (1990) Seed predation by insects in tropical mangrove forests: extent and effects on seed viability and the growth of seedlings. Oecologia 83:213–219

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1981) Biometry WH Freeman and Company, San Francisco pp 859

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanton ML (1979) The role of chemotactile stimuli in the oviposition preferences of Colias butterflies. Oecologia 39:79–91

    Google Scholar 

  • Straw NA (1989) The timing of oviposition and larval growth by two tephritid fly species in relation to host-plant development Ecol Entomol 14:443–454

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson JN (1988) Evolutionary ecology of the relationship between ovipositon preference and performance of offspring in phytophagous insects. Ent Exp Appl 47:3–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Waser NM (1978) Competition for hummingbird pollination and sequential flowering in two Colorado wildflowers. Ecology 59:934–944

    Google Scholar 

  • Waser NM, Price MV (1989) Optimal outcrossing in Ipomopsis aggregata: seed set and offspring fitness. Evolution 43:1097–1109

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Brody, A.K. Oviposition choices by a pre-dispersal seed predator (Hylemya sp.). Oecologia 91, 63–67 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00317242

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00317242

Key words

Navigation