Skip to main content
Log in

Consequences of variation in flowering phenology for seed head herbivory and reproductive success in Erigeron glaucus (Compositae)

  • Original Papers
  • Published:
Oecologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

We examined the relationship between flowering phenology, reproductive success (seed production only), and seed head herbivory for 20 similarly sized clones of Erigeron glaucus growing at Bodega Bay Reserve, northern California, USA. Although clones tended to reach peak flowering on the same date, they differed in the proportion of their total flowers produced around that date (flowering synchrony). Clones also differed in the number and density of flower heads presented at any one time to pollinators and herbivores (floral display). Both of these characteristics had consequences for herbivory and plant reproductive success. The proportion of flower heads damaged by insect herbivores was greater for clones that concentrated flowering activity during the main flowering period for the population as a whole (high synchrony) compared to clones that spread flowering out temporally. The primary reason for this result was that clones with low flowering synchrony produced a significant proportion of their flower heads during the fall and therefore, escaped attack by the tephritid fly, Tephritis ovatipennis. Clones with intermediate synchrony had lower seed success (total number of viable seeds produced over the year) than clones with either low or high synchrony. The proportion of flower heads damaged by insect herbivores and number of tephritid flies reared from flower heads were both negatively correlated to floral display while seed head mass and germination rates were positively related to display. Thus, clones which produced dense floral displays were favored both in terms of reduced herbivory and increased successful seed production.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Augspurger CK (1980) Mas-flowering of a tropical shrub (Hybanthus prunifolius): Influence on pollinator attraction and movement. Evolution 34:475–488

    Google Scholar 

  • Augspurger CK (1981) Reproductive synchrony of a tropical shrub: experimental studies on effects on pollinators and seed predators on Hybanthus prunifolius (Violacea). Ecology 62:775–788

    Google Scholar 

  • Bawa KS (1983) Patterns of flowering in tropical plants. In: CE Jones, RJ Little (eds) Handbook of experimental pollination biology, pp 394–410. Van Nostrand Reinhold Company Inc., New York, NY, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Beatie AJ, Breedlove DE, Ehrlich PR (1973) The ecology of the pollinators and predators of Frasera speciosa. Ecology 54:81–91

    Google Scholar 

  • Borowicz VA, Juliano SA (1986) Inverse density-dependent parasitism of Cornus amonium fruit by Rhagoletis cornivora. Ecology 67:639–643

    Google Scholar 

  • Breedlove DE, Ehrlich PR (1968) Plant-herbivore coevolution: lupines and lycaenids. Science 162:671–672

    Google Scholar 

  • De Steven D, Windsor DM, Putz FE, de Leon B (1987) Vegetative and reproductive phenologies of a palm assemblage in Panama. Biotropica 19:342–356

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans EW, Smith CC, Gendron RP (1989) Timing of reproduction in a prairie legume: seasonal impacts of insects consuming flowers and seeds. Oecologia 78:220–230

    Google Scholar 

  • Haddock RC, Chaplin SJ (1982) Pollination and seed production in two phenologically divergent prairie legumes (Baptisia leucophaea and B. leucantha). Am Midl Nat 108:175–186

    Google Scholar 

  • Hainsworth FR, Wolf LL, Mercier T (1984) Pollination and predispersal seed predation: net effects on reproduction and inflorescence characteristics in Ipomopsis aggregata. Oecologia 63:405–409

    Google Scholar 

  • Harper JL (1977) Population biology of plants. Academic Press, New York, NY, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Heithaus ER, Stashko E, Anderson PK (1982) Cumulative effects of plant-animal interactions on seed production by Bauhinia ungulata, a neotropical legume. Ecology 63:1294–1302

    Google Scholar 

  • Gross RS, Werner PA (1983) Relationships among flowering phenology, insect visitors, and seed set of individuals: experimental studies on four co-occurring species of goldenrod (Solidago: Compositae). Ecol Monogr 53:95–117

    Google Scholar 

  • Kephart SR (1987) Phenological variation in flowering and fruiting of Asclepias. Am Midl Nat 118:64–76

    Google Scholar 

  • Kinsman S, Platt WJ (1984) The impact of a herbivore upon Mirabilis hirsuta, a fugitive prairie plant. Oecologia 65:2–6

    Google Scholar 

  • Malau U, Eriksen B, Knudsen JT (1989) Predispersal seed predation in Bartsia alpina. Oecologia 81:181–185

    Google Scholar 

  • Marquis RJ (1988) Phenological variation in the neotropical understory shrub Piper arielanum: Causes and consequences. Ecology 69:1552–1565

    Google Scholar 

  • Munz PA (1959) A California flora. University of California Press, Berkeley, CA, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Platt WJ, Hill GR, Clark S (1974) Seed production in a prairie legume (Astragalus canadensis L.). Oecologia 17:55–63

    Google Scholar 

  • Primack RB (1980) Variation in the phenology of natural populations of montane shrubs in New Zealand. J Ecol 68:849–862

    Google Scholar 

  • Primack RB (1985) Patterns of flowering phenology in communities, populations, individuals, and single flowers. In: J White (Ed) The population structure of vegetation, pp 571–593. Dr W Junk Publishers, Dordrechi

    Google Scholar 

  • Rathcke B, Lacey EP (1985) Phenological patterns of terrestrial plants. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 16:179–214

    Google Scholar 

  • Schemske DW, Wilson MF, Melampy MN, Miller LJ, Verner L, Schemske LM, Best LB (1978) Flowering ecology of some spring woodland herbs. Ecology 59:351–366

    Google Scholar 

  • Serafini L, Karban R, English-Loeb GM (submitted) Incomplete self-incompatibility in Erigeron glaucus (Compositae): Consequences for selfed and outcrossed progeny

  • Sih A, Baltus M (1987) Patch size, pollination behavior and pollinator limitation in catnip. Ecology 68:1679–1690

    Google Scholar 

  • Solbreck C, Sillen-Tullberg B (1986) Seed production and seed predation in a patchy and time-varying environment. Dynamics of a milkweed-tephritid fly system. Oecologia 71:51–58

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson MF, Price PW (1977) The evolution of inflorescence size in Asclepias (Asclepiadaceae). Evolution 31:495–511

    Google Scholar 

  • Zar JH (1984) Biostatistical Analysis. Second edition. Prentice-Hall, INC, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman M (1980a) Reproduction in Polemonium: competition for pollinators. Ecology 61:497–501

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman M (1980b) Reproduction in Polemonium: Predispersal seed predation. Ecology 61:502–506

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

English-Loeb, G.M., Karban, R. Consequences of variation in flowering phenology for seed head herbivory and reproductive success in Erigeron glaucus (Compositae). Oecologia 89, 588–595 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00317168

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00317168

Key words

Navigation