Advertisement

Oecologia

, Volume 89, Issue 4, pp 502–508 | Cite as

Plant interactions for pollinator visits: a test of the magnet species effect

  • Terence M. Laverty
Original Papers

Summary

From 1985–1987, patterns of fruit and seed set were studied in a population of mayapple (Podophyllum peltatum), a clonal, self-incompatible herb found in deciduous woods in eastern North America. Mayapple flowers do not produce nectar, but depend on infrequent visits by nectar-seeking queen bumble bees for pollination. In all years female reproductive success in mayapple colonies was influenced by colony size (number of flowers), by the distance to neighbouring colonies and by proximity to lousewort plants (Pedicularis canadensis), a prolific nectar producer heavily visited by bumble bees. In all years fruit and seed set were greater in mayapple colonies <25 m from lousewort flowers than in matched colonies which were >50 m from lousewort. In 1985 and 1987 the frequency of queen bumble bee visits to flowers in colonies close to lousewort was about four times greater than to distant colonies. In 1986 I removed about 80% of lousewort flowers to test whether the enhanced fruit and seed set in mayapples close to lousewort was pollinator mediated. Mayapple colonies close to flowerless lousewort patches did not differ in fruit or seed set from matched colonies >50 m from lousewort. In contrast, mayapples close to flowering lousewort patches had greater fruit and seed set compared with distant colonies. Over all years, a larger proportion of mayapples close to flowering lousewort patches had enhanced fruit and seed set compared with colonies close to louseworts without flowers. Though rarely documented, this type of facilitative interaction between plants that are highly attractive to pollinators (“magnet” species), and co-flowering species that are rarely visited by pollinators, may be widespread in plant communities.

Key words

Mayapple Podophyllum peltatum Lousewort Pedicularis canadensis Pollinator facilitation 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Boyden TC (1982) The pollination biology of Calypso bulbosa var. americana (Orchidaceae): initial deception of bumblebee visitors. Oecologia 55:178–184Google Scholar
  2. Braun EL (1967) Deciduous forests of North America. Hafner, New York, New York, USAGoogle Scholar
  3. Braun J, Brooks GR (1986) Box turtles (Terrapene carolina) as potential agents for seed dispersal. Am Midl Nat 117:312–318Google Scholar
  4. Brown JH, Kodric-Brown A (1979) Convergence, competition and mimicry in a temperate community of hummingbird pollinated flowers. Ecology 60:1022–1035Google Scholar
  5. Campbell DR (1985a) Pollen and gene dispersal: the influence of competition for pollination. Evolution 99:418–431Google Scholar
  6. Campbell DR (1985b) Pollinator sharing and seed set of Stellaria pubera: competition for pollination. Ecology 66:544–553Google Scholar
  7. Dafni A (1984) Mimicry and deception in pollination. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 15:259–278Google Scholar
  8. Feinsinger P, Murray KG, Kinsman S, Busby WH (1986) Floral neighborhood and pollination success in four hummingbird-pollinated cloud forest species. Ecology 67:449–464Google Scholar
  9. Feinsinger P (1987) Effects of plant species on each others pollination: is community structure influenced? Trends Ecol Evol 2:123–126Google Scholar
  10. Galen C, Gregory T (1989) Interspecific pollen transfer as a mechanism of competition: consequences of foreign pollen contamination for seed set in the alpine wildflower Polemonium viscosum. Oecologia 81:120–123Google Scholar
  11. Handel SN (1983) Pollination ecology, plant population structure, and gene flow. In: Pollination Biology. Real L (ed) Academic Press, N.Y. 163–211Google Scholar
  12. Heinrich B (1975) Bee flowers: a hypothesis on flower variety and blooming times. Evolution 29:325–334Google Scholar
  13. Laverty TM, Plowright RC (1988) Fruit and seed set in Mayapple (Podophyllum peltatum): influence of intraspecific factors and local enhancement near Pedicularis canadensis. Can J Bot 66:173–178Google Scholar
  14. Little RJ (1983) A review of floral food deception mimicries with comments on floral mutualism. In: Handbook of Pollination Biology. CE Jones, RJ Little eds. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York: 294–309Google Scholar
  15. Macior LW (1968) Pollination adaptation in Pedicularis canadensis. Am J Bot 55:1031–1035Google Scholar
  16. Meijer W (1974) Podophyllum peltatum—may applea potential new cash crop plant of eastern North America. Econ Bot 28:68–72Google Scholar
  17. Melampy MN, Hayworth AG (1980) Seed production and pollen vectors in several nectarless plants. Evolution 34:1144–1154Google Scholar
  18. Motten AF (1986) Pollination ecology of the spring wildflower community of a temperate deciduous forest. Ecological Monographs 56:21–42Google Scholar
  19. Nilsson LA (1980) The pollination biology of Dactylorhiza sambucina (Orchidaceae). Bot Notiser 133:367–385Google Scholar
  20. Parker MA (1989) Disease impact and local genetic diversity in the clonal plant Podophyllum peltatum. Evolution 43:540–547Google Scholar
  21. Pellmyr O (1986) The pollination ecology of two nectarless Cimicifuga sp. (Ranunculaceae) in North America. Nord J Bot 6:713–723Google Scholar
  22. Rathcke BJ (1983) Competition and facilitation among plants for pollinators. In: Pollination Biology. L Real ed. Academic Press, N.Y. 305–329Google Scholar
  23. Rathcke BJ (1988) Interactions for pollination among co-flowering shrubs. Ecology 69:446–457Google Scholar
  24. Rogers RS (1982) Early spring communities in mesophytic forests in the Great Lakes region. Ecology 63:1050–1063Google Scholar
  25. Rust RW, Roth RR (1981) Seed production and seedling establishment in the Mayapple, Podophyllum peltatum L. Am Midl Nat 105:51–60Google Scholar
  26. Schemske DM, Willson MF, Melampy MM, Miller LJ, Verner L, Schemske KM, Best LB (1978) Flowering ecology of some spring woodland herbs. Ecology 59:351–366Google Scholar
  27. Schemske DM (1981) Floral convergence and pollinator sharing in two bee pollinated tropical herbs. Ecology 62:946–954Google Scholar
  28. Struik GJ, Curtis JT (1962) Herb distribution in an Acer sacharum forest. Am Midl Nat 68:285–296Google Scholar
  29. Swanson SD, Sohmer SH (1976) The biology of Podophyllum peltatum L. (Berberidaceae), the may apple II. The transfer of pollen and success of sexual reproduction. Bull Torrey Bot Club 103:223–226Google Scholar
  30. Thomson JD (1978) Effect of stand composition on insect visitation in two-species mixtures of Hieracium. Am Midl Nat 100:431–440Google Scholar
  31. Thomson JD (1981) Spatial and temporal components of resource assessment of flower-feeding insects. J Animal Ecol 50:49–59Google Scholar
  32. Thomson JD (1982) Patterns of visitation by animal pollinators. Oikos 39:241–250Google Scholar
  33. Thomson JD (1983) Component analysis of community-level interactions in pollination systems. In: Handbook of Experimental Pollination Biology. Jones CE, Little RJ eds Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, 451–460Google Scholar
  34. Waser NM (1978) Competition for hummingbird pollination and sequential flowering in two Colorado wildflowers. Ecology 59:934–944Google Scholar
  35. Waser NM (1983) Competition for pollination and floral character differences among sympatric plant species: A review of the evidence. In: Handbook of Experimental Pollination Biology. CE Jones, RJ Little eds. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, 341–359Google Scholar
  36. Waser NM, Real LA (1979) Effective mutualism between sequentially flowering plant species. Nature (London) 281:670–672Google Scholar
  37. Whistler SL, Snow AA (1990) Pollen-limited seed production in self incompatible mayapple colonies (Podophyllum peltatum). Bull Ecological Soc Am 71:403Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • Terence M. Laverty
    • 1
  1. 1.Ecology and Evolution Group, Department of ZoologyUniversity of Western OntarioLondonCanada

Personalised recommendations