Abstract
We tested several strategies of foraging that grazing herbivores may adopt in a patchy habitat in relation to energy intake. The patch selection of cattle was investigated in an Agrostis/Festuca grassland and in a Lolium grassland in 13 observation periods over 2 years. Both grasslands were stocked with five yearling steers. Bite counts were made on patches of different vegetation structure: short, tall and mature stemmy grass. Bite size of each patch category was determined by hand-plucking. Samples of patch types were analysed for organic matter digestibility, as a measure of energy content. There was a large seasonal variation in relative patch cover and in forage characteristics. However, the differences between patches in bite size, bite rate and digestibility were consistent over time. In short patches digestibility was high, bite size was low and bite rate was high compared to stemmy patches. In tall patches digestibility was only little lower than in short patches and bite size and bite rate were intermediate between short and stemmy patches. The steers selected the short and tall patches over the stemmy patches, despite a relatively low intake rate of digestible organic matter in the short patches. Four hypotheses on foraging strategy were examined to explain the allocation of time or bites between patches: random allocation according to bites, random allocation according to grazing time, matching of time in proportion to digestibility, and matching of time in proportion to intake rate of digestible organic matter. The observed distribution of bites and time between patches was significantly different from the predictions of the various hypotheses. Patch choice was better explained by a random allocation of grazing time than by a random allocation of bites. Matching for digestible organic matter intake rate yielded the worst predictions of patch selection. Matching for digestibility gave the best explanation of patch selection, but the improvement compared to a random allocation of grazing time was not significant. The significance of the contribution of digestibility to selection may have been confounded by the effect of increased selectivity within tall patches. Observed patch selection was considered in relation to the maximization of energy intake rate. The selectivity of cattle was not pronounced, but it was consistent with a principle of maximization of energy intake on a daily basis instead of a short-term basis. Selectivity appeared to be constrained by costs of searching for and discriminating between different forage resources. It is concluded that a flexible selection for short patches over tall patches and avoidance of stemmy patches provides a good approximation of energy intake maximization in a complex and changing environment.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aerts JV, Boever JL de, Cottijn BG, Brabander DL de, Buysse FX (1984) Comparative digestibility of feedstuffs by sheep and cows. Anim Feed Sci Technol 12:47–56
Allden WG, Whittaker IAM (1970) The determinants of herbage intake by grazing sheep: the interrelationship of factors influencing herbage intake and availability. Aust J Agric Res 21:755–766
Armstrong RH, Common TG, Smith HK (1986) The voluntary intake and in vivo digestibility of herbage harvested from indigenous hill plant communities. Grass Forage Sci 41:53–60
Arnold GW (1987) Influence of the biomass, botanical composition and sward height of annual pastures on foraging behaviour by sheep. J Appl Ecol 24:759–772
Arnold GW, Dudzinski ML (1978) The ethology of free-ranging domestic animals. Elsevier, Amsterdam
Bazely DR (1988) Foraging behaviour of sheep (Ovis aries L.) grazing on swards of perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.). DPhil thesis, University of Oxford, Oxford
Beekman JH, Prins HHT (1989) Feeding strategies of sedentary large herbivores in East Africa, with emphasis on the African buffalo, Syncerus caffer. Afr J Ecol 27:129–147
Burlison AJ, Hodgson J, Illius AW (1991) Sward canopy structure and the bite dimensions and bite weight of grazing sheep. Grass Forage Sci 46:29–38
Chacon E, Stobbs TH (1976) Influence of progressive defoliation of a grass sward on the eating behaviour of cattle. Aust J Agric Res 27:709–727
Demment MW, Greenwood GB (1988) Forage ingestion: effects of sward characteristics and body size. J Anim Sci 66:2380–2392
Forbes TDA (1988) Researching the plant-animal interface: the investigation of ingestive behavior in grazing animals. J Anim Sci 66:2369–2379
Goering HK, Van Soest PJ (1970) Forage fiber analysis: apparatus, reagents, procedures and some applications. Agricultural Handbook no. 379, United States Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC
Grant SA, Suckling DE, Smith HK, Torvell L, Forbes TDA, Hodgson J (1985) Comparative studies of the diet selection by sheep and cattle: the hill grasslands. J Ecol 73:987–1004
Grant SA, Torvell L, Smith HK, Suckling DE, Forbes TDA, Hodgson J (1987) Comparative studies of the diet selection by sheep and cattle: blanket bog and heather moor. J Ecol 75:947–960
Hodgson J (1982) Influence of sward characteristics on diet selection and herbage intake by the grazing animal. In: Hacker JB (ed) Nutritional limits to animal production from pastures. CAB, Farnham Royal, Slough, pp 153–166
Hodgson J, Rodriguez Capriles JM, Fenlon JS (1977) The influence of sward characteristics on the herbage intake of grazing calves. J Agric Sci Camb 89:743–750
Hodgson J, Forbes TDA, Armstrong RH, Beattie MM, Hunter EA (1991) Comparative studies of the ingestive behaviour and berbage intake of sheep and cattle grazing indigenous hill plant communities. J Appl Ecol 28:205–227
Hudson RJ, Nietfeld MT (1985) Effect of forage depletion on the feeding rate of wapiti. J Range Manage 38:80–81
Illius AW (1986) Foraging behaviour and diet selection. In: Gudmundsson O (ed) Grazing research at northern latitudes. NATO ASI series A, vol 108. Plenum Press, New York, pp 227–236
Illius AW, Gordon IJ (1987) The allometry of food intake in grazing ruminants. J Anim Ecol 56:989–999
Illius AW, Gordon IJ (1990) Constraints on diet selection and foraging behaviour in mammalian herbivores. In: Hughes RN (ed) Behavioural mechanisms of food selection. NATO ASI series G, vol 20. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, pp 369–392
Illius AW, Wood-Gush DGM, Eddison JC (1987) A study of the foraging behaviour of cattle grazing patchy swards. Biol Behav 12:33–44
Illius AW, Clark DA, Hodgson J (1992) Discrimination and patch choice by sheep grazing grass-clover swards. J Anim Ecol 61:183–194
Ketelaars JJMH, Tolkamp BJ (1992) Toward a new theory of feed intake regulation in ruminants. 1. Causes of differences in voluntary feed intake: critique of current views. Livest Prod Sci 30:269–296
Langvatn R, Hanley TA (1993) Feeding-patch choice by red deer in relation to foraging efficiency. Oecologia 95:164–170
Lucas JR (1990) Time scale and diet decisions. In: Hughes RN (ed) Behavioural mechanisms of food selection. NATO ASI series G, vol 20. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, pp 165–184
McNaughton SJ (1984) Grazing lawns: animals in herds, plant form and co-evolution. Am Nat 124:863–886
Meijden R van der, Weeda EJ, Holverda WJ, Hovenkamp PH (1990) Heukels' Flora van Nederland. 21e druk. Wolters-Noordhoff, Groningen, The Netherlands
Milinski M (1990) Information overload and food selection. In Hughes RN (ed) Behavioural mechanisms of food selection. NATO ASI series G, vol 20. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, pp 721–736
Newman JA, Parsons AJ, Harvey A (1992) Not all sheep prefer clover: diet selection revisited. J Agric Sci 119:275–283
Noldus LPJJ (1991) The Observer: a software system for collection and analysis of observational data. Behav Res Methods Instrum 23:415–429
Penning PD (1986) Some effects of sward conditions on grazing behaviour and intake-by sheep. In: Gudmundsson O (ed) Grazing research at Northern latitudes. NATO ASI series A, vol 108. Plenum Press, New York, pp 219–226
Penning PD, Parsons AJ, Orr RJ, Treacher TT (1991) Intake and behaviour responses by sheep to changes in sward characteristics under continuous stocking. Grass Forage Sci 46:15–28
SAS (1985) SAS user's guide. Version 5. Cary, NC
Stephens DW, Krebs JR (1986) Foraging theory. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ
Stobbs TH (1973) The effect of plant structure on the intake of tropical pastures. I. Variation in the bite size of grazing cattle. Aust J Agric Res 24:809–819
Thornley JHM, Parsons AJ, Newman J, Penning PD (1994) A cost-benefit model of grazing intake and diet selection in a two-species temperate grassland sward. Funct Ecol 8:5–16
Ungar ED, Noy-Meir I (1988) Herbage intake in relation to availability and sward structure: grazing processes and optimal foraging. J Appl Ecol 25:1045–1062
Vulink JT, Drost HJ (1991) A causal analysis of diet composition in free ranging cattle in reed-dominated vegetation. Oecologia 88:167–172
Wallis de Vries MF (1994) Foraging in a landscape mosaic: diet selection and performance of free-ranging cattle in heathland and riverine grassland. Doctoral thesis, Agricultural University Wageningen, Wageningen, The Netherlands
Wieren SE van (1992) Factors limiting food intake in ruminants and non ruminants in the temperate zone. In: Spitz F, Janeau G, Gonzalez G, Aulagnier S (eds) Ongulés/Ungulates 91. SFEPM-Paris IRGM-Toulouse, pp 139–145
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
de Vries, M.F.W., Daleboudt, C. Foraging strategy of cattle in patchy grassland. Oecologia 100, 98–106 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00317136
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00317136