Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Experimental analysis of diet specialization in the snail kite: the role of behavioral conservatism

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Oecologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We examined factors maintaining extreme diet specialization in the snail kite (Rostrhamus sociabilis), a medium-sized hawk which feed almost exclusively on Pomacea snails, by determining why during some months kites eat crabs (Dilocarcinus dentatus) in the Ilanos of Venezuela. We offered snails and crabs of different sizes to wild free-flying birds to develop estimates for a prey choice model. Handling times of Pomacea doliodes snails averaged 90±39 s and were positively correlated with snail size. Handling times for crabs (x=353±130 s) were significantly longer and exhibited greater variation than for snails, and were not correlated with crab size. Edible crab tissues had greater dry weights and contained more energy (25.37 kJ/g) than tissues of snails (16.91 kJ/g). Total energy of crabs was much greater than that of snails, and total energy of both foods was highly related to body length. We constructed an allometric equation for profitability of snails and crabs. Snails were more profitable than all but the largest crabs, but estimates of variance in profitability were greater for crabs. Predictions from the model were tested by offering crabs that represented equal, greater and much greater profitability than snails, to determine whether kites chose prey according to profitability. Only 15.6% of 289 food items chosen were crabs. Half of the 18 kites tested did not eat crabs and only 3 birds switched from snails to more profitable crabs. Four fledglings showed no preference for snails. The role of neophobia in food choice was investigated by offering unfamiliar snails (Pomacea urceus) to kites. Kites exhibited neophobic behaviors, and 5 of 12 birds chose not to capture P. urceus. Two-thirds of the 12 snails chosen were rejected immediately, but the others were handled efficiently (x=133±89 s). Although morphological adaptations allow kites to specialize on snails, the costs of specialization were overcome for kites when the profitability of alternative food increased sufficiently. Our results suggest a role for behavioral conservatism, in the form of risk-averse foraging and neophobia, in maintaining severe diet specialization in the snail kite.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alves de Magalhães C (1990) Hábitos alimentares e estratégia de forrageamento de Rostrhamus sociabilis no Pantanal de Mato Grosso, Brasil. Ararajuba 1:95–98

    Google Scholar 

  • Beissinger SR (1983) Hunting behavior, prey selection, and energetics of snail kites in Guyana: consumer choice by a specialist. Am Nat 136:20–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Beissinger SR (1987) Anisogamy overcome: female strategies in snail kites. Am Nat 129:486–500

    Google Scholar 

  • Beissinger SR (1988) The snail kite of North American birds, volume IV. In: Palmer RS (ed) Handbook. Yale University Press, New Haven, pp 148–165

    Google Scholar 

  • Beissinger SR (1990a) Alternative foods of a diet specialist, the snail kite. Auk 107:327–333

    Google Scholar 

  • Beissinger SR (1990b) Experimental brood manipulations and the monoparental threshold in snail kites. Am Nat 136:20–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Beissinger SR, Snyder NFR (1987) Mate desertion in the snail kite. Anim Behav 35:477–487

    Google Scholar 

  • Beissinger SR, Thomas BT, Strahl SD (1988) Vocalizations, food habits, and nesting biology of the slender-billed kite with comparisons to the snail kite. Wilson Bull 100:604–616

    Google Scholar 

  • Benkman CW (1988) Seed-handling ability, bill structure, and the cost of specialization for cross-bills. Auk 105:715–719

    Google Scholar 

  • Benkman CW, Lindholm AK (1991) The advantages and evolution of a morphological novelty. Nature 349:519–520

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourne GR (1985a) Field tests of micropatch and prey-size selection by snail kites Rostrhamus sociabilis. Ibis 127:141–147

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourne GR (1985b) The role of profitability in snail kite foraging. J Anim Ecol 54:697–709

    Google Scholar 

  • Burky AJ (1975) Growth and biomass production of an amphibian snail, Pomacea urceus (Müller) from the Venezuelan savannah. Proc Malacalog Soc Lond 41:127–143

    Google Scholar 

  • Burky KA, Burky AJ (1977) Buoyancy changes as related to respiratory behavior in an amphibious snail, Pomacea urceus (Müeller), from Venezuela. Nautillus 91:97–104

    Google Scholar 

  • Caraco T (1981) Energy budgets, risk, and foraging in dark-eyed juncos (Junco hyemalis). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 8:213–217

    Google Scholar 

  • Caraco T, Martindale S, Whittam TS (1980) An empirical demonstration of risk-sensitive foraging preferences. Anim Behav 28:820–830

    Google Scholar 

  • Cartar RV (1991) A test of risk-sensitive foraging in wild bumble bees. Ecology 72:888–895

    Google Scholar 

  • Coppinger RP (1969) The effect of experience and novelty on avian feeding behavior with reference to the evaluation of warning coloration on butterflies. I. Reactions of wild-caught adult blue jays to novel insects. Behaviour 35:45–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Coppinger RP (1970) The effect of experience and novelty on avian feeding with reference to the warning coloration of butterflies. II. Reactions of naive birds to novel insects. Am Nat 104:323–337

    Google Scholar 

  • Donnay TJ, Beissinger SR (1993) Apple snail (Pomacea doliodes) and freshwater crab (Dilocarcinus dentatus) population fluctuations in the Ilanos of Venezuela. Biotropica 25:206–214

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards TC Jr (1989) The ontogeny of diet selection in fledging ospreys. Ecology 70:881–896

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenberg JF (ed) (1979) Vertebrate ecology in the northern neotropics. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Ezekiel M, Fox KA (1963) Methods of correlation and regression analysis. Wiley New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Forbes LS (1989) Prey defenses and predator handling behaviour: the dangerous prey hypothesis. Oikos 55:155–158

    Google Scholar 

  • Futuyma DJ, Moreno G (1988) The evolution of ecological specialization. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 19:207–233

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg R (1983) The role of neophobia in determining the degree of foraging specialization in some migrant warblers. Am Nat 122:444–453

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg R (1985) The role of neophobia in foraging site selection of a tropical migrant bird: an experimental study. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 81:3778–3780

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg R (1987) Development of dead leaf foraging in a tropical migrant warbler. Ecology 68:130–141

    Google Scholar 

  • Guilford T, Dawkins MS (1987) Search images not proven; a reappraisal of recent evidence. Anim Behav 35:1838–1845

    Google Scholar 

  • Haverschmidt F (1962) Notes on the feeding habits and food of some hawks of Surinam. Condor 64:154–158

    Google Scholar 

  • Haverschmidt F (1970) Notes on the snail kite in Surinam. Auk 87:580–584

    Google Scholar 

  • Howell AH (1932) Florida bird life. Coward-McCann, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Keating JR, Robel RJ, Adams AW, Behnke KC, Kemp KE (1992) Role of handling time in selection of extruded food morsels by two granivorous bird species. Auk 109:863–868

    Google Scholar 

  • Klopfer PH (1967) Behavioral aspects of habitat selection: a preliminary report on stereotypy in foliage preferences of birds. Wilson Bull 77:376–381

    Google Scholar 

  • Krebs JR (1980) Optimal foraging, predation risk and territory defence. Ardea 68:83–90

    Google Scholar 

  • Krebs JR (1991) The case of the curious bill. Nature 349:465

    Google Scholar 

  • Labinger Z, Katir G, Benjamin Y (1991) Prey size choice by captive pied kingfishers, Ceryle rudis L. Anim Behav 42:969–975

    Google Scholar 

  • Levins R (1968) Evolution in changing environments. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Lotem A, Schechtman E, Katir G (1991) Capture of submerged prey by little egrets, Egretta garzetta garzetta: strike depth, strike angle, and the problem of light refraction. Anim Behav 42:341–346

    Google Scholar 

  • MacArthur RH (1972) Geographical ecology. Harper and Row, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Mader WJ (1981) Notes on nesting raptors in the Ilanos of Venezuela. Condor 83:48–51

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin AC, Zim HS, Nelson AL (1951) American wildlife and plants: a guide to wild food habits. Dover, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Martinez del Rio C, Stevens BR (1988) Physiological constraint on feeding behavior: intestinal membrane disaccharidases of the starling. Science 243:794–796

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer A (1989) Cost of morphological specialization: feeding performance of the two morphs in trophically polymorphic cichlid fish, Ciclasoma citrinellum. Oecologia 80:431–436

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Connell M (1989) Population dynamics of Neotropical small mammals in seasonal habitats. J Mammal 70:532–548

    Google Scholar 

  • Partridge L, Green P (1987) An advantage for specialist feeding in jackdaws, Corvus monedula. Anim Behav 35:982–990

    Google Scholar 

  • Price T (1987) Diet variation in a population of Darwin's finches. Ecology 68:1015–1028

    Google Scholar 

  • Pyke GH (1984) Optimal foraging theory: a critical review. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 15:523–575

    Google Scholar 

  • Pyke GH, Pulliam HR, Charnov EL (1977) Optimal foraging: a selective review of theory and tests. Q Rev Biol 52:137–154

    Google Scholar 

  • Real L (1991) Animal choice behavior and the evolution of cognitive architecture. Science 253:980–986

    Google Scholar 

  • Real L, Caraco T (1986) Risk and foraging in stochastic environments. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 17:371–390

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards LJ (1983) Hunger and the optimal diet. Am Nat 122:326–334

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoener TW (1969a) Optimal size and specialization in constant and fluctuating environments: an energy-time approach. In: Diversity and stability in ecological systems (Brookhaven Symposia in Biology no. 22):103–114

  • Schoener TW (1969b) Models of optimal size for solitary predators. Am Nat 103:277–313

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoener TW (1971) Theory of feeding strategies. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 2:369–404

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoener TW (1979) Generality of the size-distance relation in models of optimal feeding. Am Nat 114:902–914

    Google Scholar 

  • Sih A (1980) Optimal behavior: can foragers balance two conflicting demands? Science 210:1041–1043

    Google Scholar 

  • Snyder NFR, Kale HW II (1983) Mollusk predation by snail kites in Colombia. Auk 100:93–97

    Google Scholar 

  • Snyder NFR, Snyder HA (1969) A comparative study of mollusc predation by limpkins, Everglade kites, and boat-tailed grackles. Living Bird 8:177–223

    Google Scholar 

  • Snyder NFR, Snyder HA (1970) Feeding territories in the Everglade kite. Condor 72:492–493

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephens DW, Krebs JR (1986) Foraging theory. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephens DW, Lynch JF, Sorenson AE, Gordon C (1986) Preference and profitability: theory and experiment. Am Nat 127:533–553

    Google Scholar 

  • Strong DR, Lawton JH, Southwood R (1984) Insects on plants: community patterns and mechanisms. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutherland WJ (1987) Why do animals specialize? Nature 325:483–484

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutherland WJ, Anderson CW (1987) Six ways in which a foraging predator may encounter options with different variances. Biol J Linn Soc 30:99–114

    Google Scholar 

  • Sykes PW Jr, Kale HW II (1974) Everglades Kites feed on nonsnail prey. Auk 91:818–820

    Google Scholar 

  • Tinbergen L (1960) The natural control of insects in pine woods. I. Factors influencing the intensity of predation by songbirds. Arch Neer Zool 13:265–343

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuttle EM, Wulfson L, Caraco T (1990) Risk-aversion, relative abundance of resources and foraging preference. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 26:165–171

    Google Scholar 

  • Voous KH, van Dijk T (1973) How do snail kites extract snails from their shells? Ardea 61:179–185

    Google Scholar 

  • Waddington KD, Holden LR (1979) Optimal foraging: on flower selection by bees. Am Nat 114:179–196

    Google Scholar 

  • Weller MW (1967) Notes on some marsh birds of Cape San Antonio, Argentina. Ibis 109:391–411

    Google Scholar 

  • Werner TK, Sherry TW (1987) Behavioral feeding specialization in Pinaroloxias inornata, the “Darwin's finch” of Cocos Island, Costa Rica. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 84:5506–5510

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson L (1990) SYSTAT: the system for statistics. Systat Inc., Evanston, Ill

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodin MC, Woodin CD (1981) Everglade kite predation on a soft-shelled turtle. Fla Field Nat 9:64

    Google Scholar 

  • Wunderle JM Jr (1991) Age-specific foraging proficiency in birds. Curr Ornithol 8:273–324

    Google Scholar 

  • Wunderle JM Jr, Cotto-Navarro Z (1988) Constant versus variable risk-aversion in foraging bannaquits. Ecology 69:1434–1438

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Forestry and Environmental Studies, Yale University, 205 Prospect St., 06511, New Haven, CT, USA

    S. R. Beissinger & T. J. Donnay

  2. Department of Zoological Research, National Zoological Park, 20008, Washington, DC, USA

    S. R. Beissinger

  3. National Environmental Research Park, Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, Box 500, 60510, Batavia, IL, USA

    R. Walton

Authors
  1. S. R. Beissinger
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. T. J. Donnay
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. R. Walton
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Beissinger, S.R., Donnay, T.J. & Walton, R. Experimental analysis of diet specialization in the snail kite: the role of behavioral conservatism. Oecologia 100, 54–65 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00317130

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00317130

Key words

Search

Navigation