Skip to main content
Log in

Parameters influencing the flow cytometric analysis of DNA sensitivity to nuclease S1

  • Published:
Histochemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Some parameters that influence the analysis in situ of DNA sensitivity to digestion with nuclease S1 have been studied in isolated HeLa nuclei with flow cytometry. DNA staining with the intercalating fluorochrome propidium iodide allowed the nucleolytic activity on double-stranded (ds) DNA to be determined by monitoring the relative reduction in nuclear fluorescence intensity. Nuclei isolated in buffer at low ionic strength in order to decondense chromatin fibres, showed a lower fluorescence intensity than nuclei with native chromatin, after digestion with nuclease S1 under identical conditions. Nuclei prepared with dispersed chromatin and digested with increasing amounts of enzyme showed a decrease in fluorescence intensity that reached a limit value at about 50% of the value of undigested control samples. On the other hand, in nuclei with native chromatin, fluorescence intensity decreased only about 18%. The NaCl concentration in the reaction buffer strongly influenced the DNA sensitivity to S1 nuclease. By increasing salt molarity from 5 mM to 200 mM, the digestion of dsDNA was significantly reduced as also shown by the amount of released nucleotides from purified calf thymus DNA. The detection of DNA sensitivity to nuclease S1, as assessed by the cytometric method, was shown to be more sensitive than a biochemical technique involving hydrolysis of purines. These results indicate that both the procedure for nuclei isolation and the digestion conditions have to be carefully controlled when evaluating in situ the presence of S1-sensitive sites.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aaronson RP, Woo E (1981) Organization in the cell nucleus: divalent cations modulate the distribution of condensed and diffuse chromatin. J Cell Biol 90:181–186

    Google Scholar 

  • Ando T (1966) A nuclease specific for heat-denatured DNA isolated from a product of Aspergillus oryzae. Biochim Biophys Acta 114:158–168

    Google Scholar 

  • Cantor CR, Efstratiadis A (1984) Possible structures of homopurine-homopyrimidine S1-hypersensitive sites. Nucleic Acids Res 12:8059–8072

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins JM, Berry DE, Cobbs C (1977) Structure of parental deoxyribonucleic acid of synchronized HeLa cells. Biochemistry 16:5438–5444

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins JM, Glock MS, Chu AK (1982) Nuclease S1 sensitive sites in parental deoxyribonucleic acid of cold- and temperature-sensitive mammalian cells. Biochemistry 21:3414–3419

    Google Scholar 

  • Darzynkiewicz Z (1979) Acridine orange as a molecular probe in studies of nucleic acids in situ. In: Melamed MR, Mullaney PF, Mendelson ML (eds) Flow cytometry and sorting. Wiley, New York, pp 285–315

    Google Scholar 

  • Eissenberg JC, Cartwright IL, Thomas GH, Elgin SCR (1985) Selected topics in chromatin structure. Annu Rev Genet 19:485–536

    Google Scholar 

  • Erwin BG, Stoscheck CM, Florini JR (1981) A rapid fluorometric method for the estimation of DNA in cultured cells. Anal Biochem 110:291–294

    Google Scholar 

  • Fujimoto M, Kalinski A, Pritchard AE, Kowalski D, Laskowski MSr (1979) Accessibility of some regions of DNA in chromatin (chicken erythrocytes) to single strand-specific nucleases. J Biol Chem 254:7405–7410

    Google Scholar 

  • Giangare' MC, Prosperi E, Bottiroli G (1988) DNA sensitivity to S1 nuclease detected by base-specific fluorochromes. Basic Appl Histochem 32:297–299

    Google Scholar 

  • Gross DS, Garrard WT (1988) Nuclease hypersensitive sites in chromatin. Annu Rev Biochem 57:159–197

    Google Scholar 

  • Han S, Udvardy A, Schedl P (1984) Transcriptionally active chromatin is sensitive to Neurospora crassa and S1 nucleases. J Mol Biol 179:469–496

    Google Scholar 

  • Hentschel CC (1982) Homocopolymer sequences in the spacer of a sea urchin histone gene repeat are sensitive to S1 nuclease. Nature 295:714–716

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen DE, von Hippel PH (1976) DNA melting proteins. 1. Effect of bovine pancreatic ribonuclease binding on conformation and stability of DNA. J Biol Chem 251:7198–7214

    Google Scholar 

  • Larsen A, Weintraub H (1982) An altered DNA conformation detected by S1 nuclease occurs at specific regions in active chick globin chromatin. Cell 29:609–622

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawson GM, Cole RD (1979) Selective displacement of histone H1 from whole HeLa nuclei: effect on chromatin structure in situ as probed by micrococcal nuclease. Biochemistry 18:2160–2166

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindmo T, Steen HB (1979) Characteristic of a simple, high-resolution flow cytometry based on a new configuration. Biophys J 28:33–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Nickol JM, Felsenfeld G (1983) DNA conformation at the 5′ end of the chicken adult β-globin gene. Cell 35:467–477

    Google Scholar 

  • Olins DE, Olins AL (1972) Physical studies of isolated eucaryotic nuclei. J Cell Biol 53:751–736

    Google Scholar 

  • Panayotatos N, Wells RD (1981) Cruciform structures in supercoiled DNA. Nature 298:466–470

    Google Scholar 

  • Prentice DA, Gurley LR (1983) Nuclease digestibility of chromatin is affected by nuclei isolation procedures. Biochim Biophys Acta 740:134–144

    Google Scholar 

  • Prosperi E, Supino R, Bottiroli G (1987) Flow cytometric evaluation of DNA digestion with S1 nuclease. Basic Appl Histochem 31:511–520

    Google Scholar 

  • Prosperi E, Giangare' MC, Supino R, Bottiroli G (1990) Flow cytometric evaluation of DNA digestion with micrococcal nuclease on isolated HeLa nuclei. J Microsc (in press)

  • Pulleyblank DE, Haniford DB, Morgan AR (1985) A structural basis for S1 nuclease sensitivity of double-stranded DNA. Cell 42:271–280

    Google Scholar 

  • Pulleyblank DE, Glover M, Farah C, Haniford DB (1988) The specificity of “single strand specific endonucleases”: probes of phosphodiester conformations in double stranded nucleic acids. Left-handed polypurine/polypyrimidine structures. Long range transmission of conformational information in DNA. In: Wells RD, Harvey SC (eds) Unusual DNA structures. Springer, New York, pp 23–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Roti Roti JL, Wright D, Higashikubo R, Dethlefesen LA (1985) DNAse I sensitivity of nuclear DNA measured by flow cytometry. Cytometry 6:101–108

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruiz-Carrillo A (1984) The histone H5 gene is flanked by S1 hypersensitive sites. Nucleic Acids Res 12:6473–6492

    Google Scholar 

  • Schon E, Evans T, Welsh J, Efstratiadis A (1983) Conformation of promoter DNA: fine mapping of S1-hypersensitive sites. Cell 35:837–848

    Google Scholar 

  • Selleck SB, Elgin SCR, Cartwright IL (1984) Supercoil-dependent features of DNA structure at Drosophila locus 67B1. J Mol Biol 178:17–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegfried E, Thomas GH, Bond UM, Elgin SCR (1986) Characterization of a supercoil-dependent S1 sensitive site 5′ to the Drosophila melanogaster hsp 26 gene. Nucleic Acids Res 14:9425–9444

    Google Scholar 

  • Singleton CK, Klysik J, Stirdivant SM, Wells RD (1982) Left-handed Z-DNA is induced by supercoiling in physiological ionic conditions. Nature 299:312–316

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogt VM (1980) Purification and properties of S1 nuclease from Aspergillus. Methods Enzymol 65:248–255

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker PR, Sikorska M, Whitfield JF (1986) Chromatin structure. Nuclease digestion profiles reflect intermediate stages in the folding of the 30-nm fiber rather than the existence of subunits beads. J Biol Chem 261:7044–7051

    Google Scholar 

  • Weintraub H (1983) A dominant role for DNA secondary structure in forming hypersensitive structures in chromatin. Cell 32:1191–1203

    Google Scholar 

  • Weisbrod S (1982) Active chromatin. Nature 297:289–295

    Google Scholar 

  • Wells RD (1988) Unusual DNA structures. J Biol Chem 263:1095–1098

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Prosperi, E., Giangaré, M.C., Supino, R. et al. Parameters influencing the flow cytometric analysis of DNA sensitivity to nuclease S1. Histochemistry 93, 417–421 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00315860

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00315860

Keywords

Navigation