Skip to main content
Log in

Identification of propafenone metaboliser phenotype from plasma and urine excretion data

  • Short Communications
  • Published:
European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The aim of the study was to validate a test based on analyses of urine to identify the propafenone metaboliser phenotype during routine chronic therapy. Twenty seven patients chronically treated with propafenone were studied. A debrisoquine test was performed in 10. Propafenone and its metabolites in plasma and urine were measured by HPLC. Propafenone, 5-hydroxypropafenone and N-depropylpropafenone concentrations in plasma were 1.09, 0.182 and 0.101 ng·ml−1, respectively. Total recovery of the administered dose in urine was 30.7%. Two patients were identified as PM, based on the result of the debrisoquine test (log D/4OHD of 1.26 and 1.36). This finding was confirmed by the propafenone metabolic ratio in urine, but the plasma data did not permit clearcut separation of the phenotypes. Propafenone/5-hydroxypropafenone in plasma was not a good predictor of metabolizer phenotype. Although the number of patients who completed all three tests was limited, it is concluded that analysis of propafenone/5-hydroxypropafenone in urine collected between two consecutive doses at steady-state is more practical than the debrisoquine test and more specific than determining the propafenone/5-hydroxypropafenone ratio in plasma, for identification of the propafenone metaboliser phenotypes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Harron DWG, Brogden RN (1987) Propafenone. A review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic use in the treatment of arrhythmias. Drugs 34: 617–647

    Google Scholar 

  2. Funck-Brentano C, Kroemer HK, Lee JT, Roden DM (1990) Propafenone. N Engl J Med 322: 518–525

    Google Scholar 

  3. Thompson KA, Iansmith DHS, Siddoway LA, Woosley RL, Roden DM (1988) Potent electrophysiologic effects of the major metabolites of propafenone in canine Purkinje fibers. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 244: 950–955

    Google Scholar 

  4. Malfatto G, Zaza A, Forster M, Sodowick B, Danilo P Jr, Rosen MR (1988) Electrophysiologic, inotropic and antiarrhythmic effects of propafenone, 5-hydroxypropafenone and N-depropylpropafenone. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 246: 419–426

    Google Scholar 

  5. Siddoway LA, Thompson KA, McAllister CB, Wang T, Wilkinson GR, Roden DM, Woosley RL (1987) Polimorphism of propafenone metabolism and disposition in man: clinical and pharmacokinetic consequences. Circulation 75: 785–791

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kroemer HK, Mikus G, Kronbach T, Meyer UA, Eichelbaum M (1989) In vitro characterization of the human cytochrome P-450 involved in polymorphic oxidation of propafenone. Clin Pharmacol Ther 45: 28–33

    Google Scholar 

  7. Boriani G, Strocchi E, Capucci A, Boschi S, Marchesini B, Ambrosioni E, Magnani B (1990) Relationships between debrisoquine hydroxylation and propafenone pharmacokinetics. Drug Invest 2: 114–119

    Google Scholar 

  8. Lee JT, Kroemer HK, Silberstein DJ, Funck-Brentano C, Lineberry MD, Wood AJJ, Roden DM, Woosley RL (1990) The role of genetically determined polymorphic drug metabolism in the beta-blockade produced by propafenone. N Engl J Med 322: 1764–1768

    Google Scholar 

  9. Funck-Brentano C, Kroemer HK, Pavlou H, Woosley RL, Roden DM (1989) Genetically-determined interaction between propafenone and low dose quinidine: role of active metabolites in modulating net drug effect. Br J Clin Pharmacol 27: 435–444

    Google Scholar 

  10. Brosen K, Gram LF (1989) Clinical significance of the sparteine/debrisoquine oxidation polymorphism. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 36: 537–547

    Google Scholar 

  11. Latini R, Sica A, Marchi S, Chen ZM, Gavinelli M, Benfenati E (1988) High-performance liquid chromatographic separation and mass spectrometric identification of propafenone, 5-hydroxypropafenone and N-depropylpropafenone. J Chromatogr 424: 211–214

    Google Scholar 

  12. Lennard MS, Silas JH, Smith AJ, Tucker GT (1977) Determination of debrisoquine and its 4-hydroxy metabolite in biological fluids by gas chromatography with flame-ionization and nitrogen-selective detection. J Chromatogr 133: 161–166

    Google Scholar 

  13. Wagner F, Jähnchen E, Trenk D, Eichelbaum M, Harnasch P, Hauf G, Roskamm H (1987) Severe complications of antianginal drug therapy in a patient identified as a poor metabolizer of metoprolol, propafenone, diltiazem, and sparteine. Klin Wochenschr 65: 1164–1168

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kates RE, Yee YG, Winkle RA (1985) Metabolite cumulation during chronic propafenone dosing in arrhythmia. Clin Pharmacol Ther 37: 610–614

    Google Scholar 

  15. Giani P, Landolina M, Giudici V, Bianchini C, Ferrario G, Marchi S, Riva E, Latini R (1988) Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of propafenone during acute and chronic administration. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 34: 187–194

    Google Scholar 

  16. Vozeh S, Haefeli W, Ha H-R, Vlcek J, Follath F (1990) Nonlinear kinetics of propafenone metabolites in healthy man. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 38: 509–513

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hege HG, Hollmann M, Kaumeier S, Lietz H (1984) The metabolic fate of 2H-labelled propafenone in man. Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet 9: 41–55

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Latini, R., Belloni, M., Bernasconi, R. et al. Identification of propafenone metaboliser phenotype from plasma and urine excretion data. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 42, 111–114 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00314930

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00314930

Key words

Navigation