Abstract
This note shows how Kornai's concept of the soft budget constraint can be decomposed into separate elements of technical inefficiency and relative price distortion. The distinction between r-budget softness and m-budget softness introduced by Gomulka is shown to correspond to the equivalent and compensating variation measures of efficiency loss. It is also argued that budget softness should be viewed as the outcome of a rent-seeking process in which a firm's action in the control sphere incurs an opportunity cost in the real sphere. Adopting such a perspective leads to a re-definition of the resource loss associated with budget softness and results in much higher estimates of the social costs of soft budgets than those proposed in the existing literature.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Colander, D.C. (1984), Neoclassical Political Economy, Cambridge, Ballinger.
Freris, A. (1984), The Soviet Industrial Enterprise, Croom Helm.
Gomulka, S. (1985), ‘Kornai's soft budget constraint and the shortage phenomenon: A criticism and restatemen’, Economics of Planning 19, No. 1.
Kornai, J. (1980), Economics of Shortage, Amsterdam, North Holland.
Kornai, J. (1985), Gomulka on the soft budget constraint: a Reply, Economics of Planning 19, No. 2.
Krueger, A.O. (1974), ‘The political economy of the rent-seeking society’, American Economic Review 64, 291–303.
Rowley, C.K. (1988), ‘Rent-seeking versus directly unproductive profit-seeking activities’, in C.K. Rowley et al., op. cit.
Rowley, C.K., Tollison, R.D., and Tullock, G. (1988), The Political Economy of Rent-Seeking, Boston, Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Tollison, R.D. (1982), ‘Rent-seeking: A survey’, Kyklos 35.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Scott, C. Soft budgets and hard rents: a note on Kornai and Gomulka. Econ Plann 23, 117–127 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00312930
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00312930