Skip to main content
Log in

Polygyny in the great reed warbler, Acrocephalus arundinaceus: a possible case of deception

  • Published:
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Polygyny was studied for 1 year in a great reed warbler population breeding in southern Germany. Data on various parameters of male and territory characteristics were collected and subjected to multivariate statistical analysis in order to assess their relative importance in female choice. Differences in territory characteristics appeared to be more important (Tab. 1), but there was a strong correlation between male and territory characteristics (Fig. 2, 3). Although the evolutionary advantages of polygyny to males are obvious (Fig. 5), those to females are far from clear. Models based upon the polygyny threshold and sexy son hypotheses predict that females should gain evolutionary advantage in either the short or long-term. Our data did not confirm such predictions, and secondary females showed greatly reduced breeding success (Fig. 4). If females were able to assess the status of mated males, they should instead select unmated males. Great reed warblers are a migrant species with a short breeding cycle in which the male plays relatively little part. They defend large territories in reed beds where visibility is reduced. These factors may permit males to practice a form of deception, by moving and attracting a second female who has little chance to assess that he is already mated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alatalo R, Carlson A, Lundberg A, Ulfstrand S (1981) The conflict between male polygamy and female monogamy: the case of the Pied Flycatcher Ficedula hypoleuca. Am Nat 117:738–753

    Google Scholar 

  • Alatalo RV, Lundberg A, Ståhlbrandt K (1982) Why do Pied Flycatcher females mate with already-mated males? Anim Behav 30:585–593

    Google Scholar 

  • Beier J (1981) Untersuchungen an Drossel- und Teichrohrsänger (Acrocephalus arundinaceus, A. scirpaceus): Bestandsentwicklung, Brutbiologie, Ökologie. J Ornithol 122:209–230

    Google Scholar 

  • Catchpole CK (1983) Variation in the song of the Great Reed Warbler Acrocephalus arundinaceus in relation to mate attraction and territorial defence. Anim Behav 31:1217–1225

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox DR (1970) The analysis of binary data. Chapman & Hall, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwin C (1871) The descent of man and selection in relation to sex. Murray, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyrcz A (1977) Polygamy and breeding succes among Great Reed Warblers Acrocephalus arundinaceus at Milicz, Poland. Ibis 119:73–77

    Google Scholar 

  • Emlen ST, Oring LW (1977) Ecology, sexual selection and the evolution of mating systems. Science 197:215–223

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher RA (1958) The genetical theory of natural selection. Dover, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Garson PJ, Pleszczynska WK, Holm CH (1981) The polygyny threshold model: a reassessment. Can J Zool 59:902–910

    Google Scholar 

  • Heisler IL (1981) Offspring quality and the polygyny threshold: a new model for the sexy son hypothesis. Am Nat 117:316–328

    Google Scholar 

  • Jennrich RI (1977) Stepwise regression. In: Enslein K, Ralston A, Wilf HS (eds) Statistical methods for digital computers. Wiley, New York, pp 58–75

    Google Scholar 

  • Kluyver HN (1955) Das Verhalten des Drosselrohrsängers, Acrocephalus arundinaceus am Brutplatz mit besonderer Berücksichtigung der Nestbautechnik und der Revierbehauptung. Ardea 43:1–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Lack D (1968) Ecological adaptations for breeding in birds. Chapman & Hall, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Leisler B (1981) Die ökologische Einmischung der mitteleuropäischen Rohrsänger (Acrocephalus, Sylviinae). I. Habitattrennung. Vogelwarte 31:45–74

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenington S (1983)CCommentary on the study of avian mating systems. In: Brush AH, Clark GA (eds) Perspectives in ornithology. Cambridge University Press, pp 85–91

  • Mock DW (1983) On the study of avian mating systems. In: Brush AH, Clark GA (eds) Perspectives in ornithology. Cambridge University Press, pp 55–84

  • Morrison DF (1976) Multivariate statistical methods, 2nd edn. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Orians GH (1969) On the evolution of mating systems in birds and mammals. Am Nat 103:589–603

    Google Scholar 

  • Oring LW (1982) Avian mating systems. In: Farner DS, King JR, Parkes KC (eds) Avian biology, vol 6. Academic Press, New York, pp 1–92

    Google Scholar 

  • Peltzer RJ (1972) Notes on the polygamous behaviour of Acrocephalus arundinaceus. Proc 15th Int Ornithol Congr, Leiden, pp 676–677

  • Pleszczynska WK (1978) Microgeographic prediction of polygyny in the lark bunting. Science 201:935–937

    Google Scholar 

  • Price FE, Bock CE (1973) Polygyny in the dipper. Condor 75:457–459

    Google Scholar 

  • Searcy WA, Yasukawa K (1981) Does the sexy son hypothesis apply to mate choice in Red-winged Blackbirds. Am Nat 117:343–348

    Google Scholar 

  • Verner J (1964) Evolution of polygamy in the Long-billed Marsh Wren. Evolution 18:252–261

    Google Scholar 

  • Verner J, Willson MF (1966) The influence of habitats on mating systems of North American passerine birds. Ecology 47:143–147

    Google Scholar 

  • Weatherhead PJ, Robertson RJ (1979) Offspring quality and the polygyny threshold: the sexy son hypothesis. Am Nat 113:201–208

    Google Scholar 

  • Weatherhead JP, Robertson RJ (1981) In defense of the sexy son hypothesis. Am Nat 117:349–356

    Google Scholar 

  • Winkel W, Winkel D (1984) Polygynic des Trauerschnäppers (Ficedula hypoleuca) am Westrand seines Areals in Mitteleuropa. J Ornithol 125:1–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittenberger JF (1979) The evolution of mating systems in birds and mammals. In: Marler P, Vandenbergh J (eds) Handbook of behavioral neurobiology, vol 3, Social behavior and communication. Plenum, New York, pp 271–349

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittenberger JF (1981) Male quality and polygyny: the sexy son hypothesis revisited. Am Nat 117:329–342

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Catchpole, C., Leisler, B. & Winkler, H. Polygyny in the great reed warbler, Acrocephalus arundinaceus: a possible case of deception. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 16, 285–291 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00310992

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00310992

Keywords

Navigation