Summary
Polygyny was studied for 1 year in a great reed warbler population breeding in southern Germany. Data on various parameters of male and territory characteristics were collected and subjected to multivariate statistical analysis in order to assess their relative importance in female choice. Differences in territory characteristics appeared to be more important (Tab. 1), but there was a strong correlation between male and territory characteristics (Fig. 2, 3). Although the evolutionary advantages of polygyny to males are obvious (Fig. 5), those to females are far from clear. Models based upon the polygyny threshold and sexy son hypotheses predict that females should gain evolutionary advantage in either the short or long-term. Our data did not confirm such predictions, and secondary females showed greatly reduced breeding success (Fig. 4). If females were able to assess the status of mated males, they should instead select unmated males. Great reed warblers are a migrant species with a short breeding cycle in which the male plays relatively little part. They defend large territories in reed beds where visibility is reduced. These factors may permit males to practice a form of deception, by moving and attracting a second female who has little chance to assess that he is already mated.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alatalo R, Carlson A, Lundberg A, Ulfstrand S (1981) The conflict between male polygamy and female monogamy: the case of the Pied Flycatcher Ficedula hypoleuca. Am Nat 117:738–753
Alatalo RV, Lundberg A, Ståhlbrandt K (1982) Why do Pied Flycatcher females mate with already-mated males? Anim Behav 30:585–593
Beier J (1981) Untersuchungen an Drossel- und Teichrohrsänger (Acrocephalus arundinaceus, A. scirpaceus): Bestandsentwicklung, Brutbiologie, Ökologie. J Ornithol 122:209–230
Catchpole CK (1983) Variation in the song of the Great Reed Warbler Acrocephalus arundinaceus in relation to mate attraction and territorial defence. Anim Behav 31:1217–1225
Cox DR (1970) The analysis of binary data. Chapman & Hall, London
Darwin C (1871) The descent of man and selection in relation to sex. Murray, London
Dyrcz A (1977) Polygamy and breeding succes among Great Reed Warblers Acrocephalus arundinaceus at Milicz, Poland. Ibis 119:73–77
Emlen ST, Oring LW (1977) Ecology, sexual selection and the evolution of mating systems. Science 197:215–223
Fisher RA (1958) The genetical theory of natural selection. Dover, New York
Garson PJ, Pleszczynska WK, Holm CH (1981) The polygyny threshold model: a reassessment. Can J Zool 59:902–910
Heisler IL (1981) Offspring quality and the polygyny threshold: a new model for the sexy son hypothesis. Am Nat 117:316–328
Jennrich RI (1977) Stepwise regression. In: Enslein K, Ralston A, Wilf HS (eds) Statistical methods for digital computers. Wiley, New York, pp 58–75
Kluyver HN (1955) Das Verhalten des Drosselrohrsängers, Acrocephalus arundinaceus am Brutplatz mit besonderer Berücksichtigung der Nestbautechnik und der Revierbehauptung. Ardea 43:1–50
Lack D (1968) Ecological adaptations for breeding in birds. Chapman & Hall, London
Leisler B (1981) Die ökologische Einmischung der mitteleuropäischen Rohrsänger (Acrocephalus, Sylviinae). I. Habitattrennung. Vogelwarte 31:45–74
Lenington S (1983)CCommentary on the study of avian mating systems. In: Brush AH, Clark GA (eds) Perspectives in ornithology. Cambridge University Press, pp 85–91
Mock DW (1983) On the study of avian mating systems. In: Brush AH, Clark GA (eds) Perspectives in ornithology. Cambridge University Press, pp 55–84
Morrison DF (1976) Multivariate statistical methods, 2nd edn. McGraw-Hill, New York
Orians GH (1969) On the evolution of mating systems in birds and mammals. Am Nat 103:589–603
Oring LW (1982) Avian mating systems. In: Farner DS, King JR, Parkes KC (eds) Avian biology, vol 6. Academic Press, New York, pp 1–92
Peltzer RJ (1972) Notes on the polygamous behaviour of Acrocephalus arundinaceus. Proc 15th Int Ornithol Congr, Leiden, pp 676–677
Pleszczynska WK (1978) Microgeographic prediction of polygyny in the lark bunting. Science 201:935–937
Price FE, Bock CE (1973) Polygyny in the dipper. Condor 75:457–459
Searcy WA, Yasukawa K (1981) Does the sexy son hypothesis apply to mate choice in Red-winged Blackbirds. Am Nat 117:343–348
Verner J (1964) Evolution of polygamy in the Long-billed Marsh Wren. Evolution 18:252–261
Verner J, Willson MF (1966) The influence of habitats on mating systems of North American passerine birds. Ecology 47:143–147
Weatherhead PJ, Robertson RJ (1979) Offspring quality and the polygyny threshold: the sexy son hypothesis. Am Nat 113:201–208
Weatherhead JP, Robertson RJ (1981) In defense of the sexy son hypothesis. Am Nat 117:349–356
Winkel W, Winkel D (1984) Polygynic des Trauerschnäppers (Ficedula hypoleuca) am Westrand seines Areals in Mitteleuropa. J Ornithol 125:1–14
Wittenberger JF (1979) The evolution of mating systems in birds and mammals. In: Marler P, Vandenbergh J (eds) Handbook of behavioral neurobiology, vol 3, Social behavior and communication. Plenum, New York, pp 271–349
Wittenberger JF (1981) Male quality and polygyny: the sexy son hypothesis revisited. Am Nat 117:329–342
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Catchpole, C., Leisler, B. & Winkler, H. Polygyny in the great reed warbler, Acrocephalus arundinaceus: a possible case of deception. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 16, 285–291 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00310992
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00310992