Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology

, Volume 16, Issue 3, pp 223–231

Circadian patterns of premating behavior in Teleogryllus oceanicus Le Guillou under laboratory and field conditions

  • Werrer Loher
  • Larry J. Orsak
Article

Summary

The temporal relationship between male-calling and female-walking of Teleogryllus ocearicus has been studied. Both behaviors are under circadian control. A comparison of singingactivity under controlled environmental conditions and in the field at LD 13.75:10.25 h revealed that in spote of the very different situations, calling occurred during darkness; the times of onset, termination of singing and the calling quantity agreed as well. However, significant individual differences in singing activity were observed in either environment, and for specific males on consecutive nights.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alexander RD (1961) Aggressiveness, territoriality and sexual behavior in field crickets (Orthoptera: Gryllidae). Behaviour 17:130–323Google Scholar
  2. Alexander RD, Meral GH (1967) Seasonal and daily chirping cycles in the northern spring and fall crickets, Gryllus veletis and G. pennsylvanicus. Ohio J Sci 67:200–209Google Scholar
  3. Cade W (1975) Acoustically orienting parasitoids: fly phonotaxis to cricket song. Science 190:1312–1313Google Scholar
  4. Cade W (1979) The evolution of alternative male reproductive competition in insects. In: Blum MS, Blum NA (eds) Sexual selection and reproductive competition in insects. Academic Press, New York, pp 343–379Google Scholar
  5. Cade W (1981) Field cricket spacing and the phonotaxis of crickets and parasitoid flies to clumped and isolated cricket sorgs. Z Tierpsychol 55:365–375Google Scholar
  6. Campbell JD, Shipp E (1979) Regulation of spatial patterns in populations of the field cricket, Teleogryllus commodus (Walker). Z Tierpsychol 51:260–268Google Scholar
  7. Forrest TG (1980) Phonotaxis in mole crickets: its reproductive significance. Fla Entomol 63:45–53Google Scholar
  8. Forrest TG (1983) Calling songs and mate choice in mole crickets. In: Gwynne DT, Morris GH (eds) Orthopteran mating systems. Westview, Boulder, pp 185–204Google Scholar
  9. Gwynne DT, Morris GK (1983) Orthopteran mating systems. Westview, BoulderGoogle Scholar
  10. Honegger HW (1981) Three different diel rhythms of the calling song in the cricket, Gryllus campestris, and their control mechanisms. Physiol Entomol 6:289–296Google Scholar
  11. Huber F (1955) Sitz und Bedeutung nervöser Zentren für Instinkthandlungen beim Männchen von Gryllus campestris. Z Tierpsychol 12:12–48Google Scholar
  12. Leroy Y (1966) Signaux acoustiques, comportement et systematique de quelques espéces de Gryllides (Orthoptéres, Ensiféres). Bull Biol 100:1–134Google Scholar
  13. Loher W (1972) Circadian control of stridulation in the cricket Teleogryllus commodus Walker. J Comp Physiol 79:173–190Google Scholar
  14. Loher W (1979) Circadian rhythmicity of locomotor behavior and oviposition in female Teleogryllus commodus. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 5:253–262Google Scholar
  15. Loher W (1981) The effect of mating on female sexual behavior of Teleogryllus commodus Walker. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 9:219–225Google Scholar
  16. Loher W, Rence B (1978) The mating behavior of Teleogryllus commodus (Walker) and its central and peripheral control. Z Tierpsychol 46:225–259Google Scholar
  17. Loher W, Wiedenmann G (1981) Temperature-dependent changes in circadian patterns of cricket premating behavior. Physiol Entomol 6:35–43Google Scholar
  18. Neumann D (1980) Synchronization of reproduction in marine insects by tides. In: Clark WH, Adams TS (eds) Advances in invertebrate reproduction, pp 21–35Google Scholar
  19. Nielsen ET, Dreisig H (1970) The behavior of stridulation in Orthoptera Ensifera. Behavioun 37:205–252Google Scholar
  20. Popov AV (1975) Acoustic behaviour and migrations of field crickes Gryllus campestris. Zool Zh 54:1803–1809Google Scholar
  21. Popov AV, Shuvalov VF (1977) Phonotactic behavior in crickets. J Comp Physiol 119:111–126Google Scholar
  22. Regen J (1913) Über die Anlockung des Weibchens von Gryllus campestris durch telephonisch übertragene Stridulationslaute des Männchens. Pflügers Arch Physiol 155:193–200Google Scholar
  23. Steinen K vd (1898) Reise nach den Marquesas-Inseln. Verh Ges Erdkd (Berl) 25:489–513Google Scholar
  24. Walker TJ (1980) Reproductive behavior and mating success of male short-tailed crickets: differences within and between demes. Evol Biol 13:219–260Google Scholar
  25. Walker TJ (1983) Diel patterns of calling in nocturnal orthoptera. In: Gwynne DT, Morris GK (eds) Orthopteran mating systems. Westview, Boulder, pp 45–72Google Scholar
  26. Walker TJ, Whitesell JJ (1982) Singing schedules and sites for a tropical burrowing cricket (Anurogryllus muticus). Biotropica 14:220–227Google Scholar
  27. Youthed GJ, Moran VC (1969) The lunar day activity rhythm of myrmeleonid larvae. J Insect Physiol 15:1259–1271Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1985

Authors and Affiliations

  • Werrer Loher
    • 1
  • Larry J. Orsak
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Entomological SciencesUniversity of CaliforniaBerkeleyUSA

Personalised recommendations