Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Observations on the moving colonies of the genus Tethya (Demospongia, Porifera)

I. Behaviour and cytology

Zoomorphology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Cite this article

Summary

Observations on two species of sponges, Tethya seychellensis from the Red Sea, and T. aurantium from the Mediterranean Sea revealed that young colonies are able to detach from their sites of settlement and by means of filamentous podia, to move to other sites in the vicinity. These podia are 10–16 mm long extensions of the sponge body wall that bear an adhesive knob on their distal ends. After being attached, the contracting ‘podia’ pull the spherical colonies of 2.0–3.0 cm in diameter, transporting them to a new site. EM observations showed that in the podia the matrix is rich in contractile myocytes, primary archaeocytes, nucleated archaeocytes and scleroblastic cells, each of which takes part in the moving ability of the podium. It was also shown that some of the archaeocytes go over a process of ripening within the podium and produce collagenic filaments deposited in the internal matrix.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bagby R (1970) The fine structure of pinacocytes in the marine sponge Microciona prolifera (Ellis and Solander). Z Zellforsch 105:579–594

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergquist PR, Sinclair MM, Hogg JJ (1970) Adaptation to intertidal existance. In: Fry WG (ed) Reproduction cycles and larval behaviour in Demospongia. Biology of Porifera. Symp Zool Soc London Vol 25. Academic Press, London, pp 247–271

    Google Scholar 

  • Connes R (1967) Structure et dévelopment des bourgeons chez l'éponge siliceuse Tethya lyncurium Lamark. Recherches expérimentales et cytologiques. Arch Zool Exp Gen 108:157–195

    Google Scholar 

  • Edmundson CH (1946) Reproduction in Donatia deformis (Thiele). Occas Pag BP Bishop Mus Honolulu 18:271–282

    Google Scholar 

  • Fell PE (1974) Porifera. In: Giese AC, Pearse JS (ed) Reproduction of marine invertebrates, Vol 1. Academic Press New York London, pp 51–132

    Google Scholar 

  • Fell PE, Jacob WF (1979) Reproduction and development of Halichondria sp. in the Mystic Estuary, Connecticut. Biol Bull 156:62–75

    Google Scholar 

  • Fishelson L (1971) Benthic communities of the Red Sea. Mar Biol 10:113–130

    Google Scholar 

  • Fry WG (ed) (1970) The biology of Porifera. Symp Zool Soc London Vol 25. Academic Press, New York London, p 512

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison FW (1974) Histology and histochemistry of developing outgrowths of Corvomeyenia cardensis Harrison (Porifera, Spongilidae). J Morphol 1944:185–194

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison FW, Cowden RR (ed) (1976) Aspects of sponge biology. Academic Press, New York London, p 354

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyman L (1940) The sponges. In: Invertebrata, Vol I. Protozoa through Ctenophora, McGraw Hill, New York, pp 284–364

    Google Scholar 

  • Junqua S, Robert L, Garrone R, Pavans de Ceccatty M, Vacelet J (1974) Biochemical and morphological studies on collagens of Horny sponges Ircinia: filaments compared to spongins. Connect Tissue Res 2:193–203

    Google Scholar 

  • Lévi C (1956) Étude de Halisarca de Roscoff. Embryologie et systematique des Démosponges. Arch Zool Exp Gen 93:1–181

    Google Scholar 

  • Lévi C (1970) Les cellules des Eponges. In: Fry WG (ed) Biology of Porifera. Symp Zool Soc Lond Vol 25, Academic Press, London, pp 353–364

    Google Scholar 

  • Meglitsch PA (1972) Invertebrate Zoology (sec ed) 834pp. Oxford Univ Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Pompini ShA (1976) A cytological study of the Haliclonidae and Callyspongidae (Porifera, Demospongiae, Haplosclerida) In: Harrison FW, Cowden RR (ed) Aspects of sponge biology. Academic Press, New York London pp 215–235

    Google Scholar 

  • Riedl R (1963) Fauna und Flora der Adria. Ver Paul Parey, Hamburg Berlin p 640

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson TL (1963) The biology of the marine sponge Microciona prolifera (Ellis and Solander). I. A study of cellular function and differentiation. J Exp Zool 154:135–151

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson TL (1973) Coloniality among the Porifera. In: Boardman RS, Cheetham AH, Oliver WA Jr (ed) Animal colonies; Development and function through time. Dowden, Hutchinson and Ross Publ, Stroudsburg, PA, pp 549–565

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson TL (1980) Reproduction process in Sponges: a critical evaluation of current data and views. Int J Invert Repr 2:251–269

    Google Scholar 

  • Watanabe U (1957) Development of Tethya serica Lebwohl, a Tetraxonian sponge I. Observations on external changes. Nat Sci Rep Ochanomizu Univ 8:(2):97–104

    Google Scholar 

  • Weisenfels N, Stringer B (1979) Bau und Funktion des Süsswasserschwamms Ephydatia fluviatilis L. (Porifera) VI. Das Individualitätsproblem. Zoomorphologie 92:49–63

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Zoology, George S. Wise Faculty of Life sciences, Tel Aviv University, Israel

    Lev Fishelson

Authors
  1. Lev Fishelson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fishelson, L. Observations on the moving colonies of the genus Tethya (Demospongia, Porifera). Zoomorphology 98, 89–99 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00310322

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00310322

Keywords

search

Navigation