Skip to main content
Log in

(Monopolistic) resource extraction and limit pricing: The market penetration of competitively produced synfuels

  • Published:
Environmental and Resource Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper analyzes the market penetration of a competitively produced synfuel, e.g., solar energy, in a market that is initially dominated by a resource extracting monopoly. The availability of the renewable substitute depends not only on the price/cost ratio but also on the installed capacities, which reflect historical investments. As a consequence, the resource monopoly faces a discontinuous residual demand schedule. The dynamic interactions between the resource cartel and the synfuel industry are modelled as a differential game; the (open loop) Nash equilibrium is applied to this game. It will be shown that the commodity price will exceed the production costs of the backstop and that the transition from the periods of resource dependence to the backstop technology will be gradual.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Basar, T. (1989), ‘Time Consistency and Robustness of Equilibria in Non-Cooperative Games’, in F. van der Ploeg and A. J. Zeeuw, eds., Dynamic Policy Games in Economics, 9–54, North Holland.

  2. Cremer, J. and Weitzman, M. L. (1976). ‘OPEC and the Monopoly Price of World Oil’, European Economic Review 8, 155–164.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Dasgupta, P. and Heal, G. M. (1974), ‘The Optimal Depletion of Exhaustible Resources’, Review of Economic Studies 41, Symposium on the Economics of Exhaustible Resources, 3–28.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Dasgupta, P. and Heal, G. M. (1979) Economic Theory and Exhaustible Resources, Cambridge Economic Handbooks.

  5. Dockner, E. (1984), ‘Optimal Pricing of a Monopoly Against a Competitive Producer’, Optimal Control Applications & Methods 5, 345–351.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Feichtinger, G. and Hartl, R. F. (1986), Optimale Kontrolle ökonomischer Prozesse, Walter de Gruyter.

  7. Heal, G. M. (1979), ‘Uncertainty and the Optimal Supply Policy for an Exhaustible Resource’, in R. S. Pindyck, ed., Advances in the Economics of Energy and Resources, Vol. 2, 119–147, JAI Press.

  8. Hoel, M. (1983), ‘Monopoly Resource Extractions under the Presence of Predetermined Substitute Production’, Journal of Economic Theory 30, 201–212.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hotelling, H. (1931), ‘The Economics of Exhaustible Resources’, Journal of Political Economy 39, 137–175.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kamien, M. I. and Schwartz, N. L. (1981), Dynamic Optimization: The Calculus of Variations and Optimal Control in Economics and Management, North Holland.

  11. Kemp, M. C. and Long, N. van (1982), ‘On the Development of a Substitute for an Exhaustible Resource’, in W. Eichhorn, ed., Economic Theory of Natural Resources, 47–63, Physica, Würzburg-Wien.

  12. Kemp, M. C. and Long, N. van (ed.) (1980), Exhaustible Resources, Optimality and Trade, Amsterdam, North Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Nordhaus, W. D. (1973), ‘The Allocation of Energy Resources’, Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 3, 529–576.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Salant, S. W. (1975), ‘Exhaustible Resources and Industrial Structure, A Nash/Cournot Approach to the World Oil Market’, Journal of Political Economy 84, 1079–1093.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Salant, S. W. (1979), ‘Staving Off the Backstop: Dynamic Limit-Pricing with a Kinked Demand Curve’, in R. S. Pindyck, ed., Advances in the Economics of Energy and Resources, Vol. 2, 187–204, JAI Press.

  16. Selten, R. (1975), ‘Reexamination of the Perfectness Concept for Equilibrium Points in Extensive Games’, International Journal of Game Theory 4, 25–55.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Solow, R. (1974), ‘The Economics of Resources or the Resources of Economics’, American Economic Review 64, 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Stiglitz, J. E. and Dasgupta, P. (1981), ‘Market Structure and Resource Extraction under Uncertainty’, Scandinavian Journal of Economics 83, 318–333.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Stiglitz, J. E. and Dasgupta, P. (1982), ‘Market Structure and Resource Depletion, A Contribution to the Theory of Intertemporal Monopolistic Competition’, Journal of Economic Theory 28, 128–164.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Stiglitz, J. E. and Dasgupta, P. (1983), ‘Strategic Considerations in Invention and Innovation, the Case of Natural Resources’, Econometrica 51, 1439–1448.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Wirl, F. (1988), ‘Resource Extraction of Imperfect Substitutes’, Energy Economics 10, 242–248.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wirl, F. (Monopolistic) resource extraction and limit pricing: The market penetration of competitively produced synfuels. Environmental and Resource Economics 1, 157–178 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00310016

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00310016

Key words

Navigation