Abstract
The paper reports on a comparative study of direct and indirect approaches to valuing environmental amenities (i.e., public goods), specifically, air quality in terms of its human health effects. The application of three indirect valuation methods (via market goods) is reported here: the health production method, a consumer preferences (for nonmarket goods) model, and the cost of illness method. The first and second methods are (economic) behavior-based approaches where willingness to pay for an environmental good is derived by exploiting relationships in consumption between the public good and market good(s). The third method is based on a physical relationship—a dose-response function—between the environmental good and health. The direct valuation approach encompassed three contingent valuation elicitation formats: open-ended, modified iterative bidding game, and referenda-style binary choice. The application of all four methods was based on data from a survey of a large, stratified sample of households from the Haifa metropolitan area in northern Israel. The estimates of welfare change derived by the various methods are discussed and compared.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Berger, M. C., Blomquist, G. C., Kenkel, D., and Tolley, G. S. (1987), ‘Valuing Changes in Health Risks: A Comparison of Alternative Measures’, Southern Economic J. 53, 967–984.
Bergstrom, J. C., Stoll, J. R., and Randall, A. (1989), ‘Information Effects in Contingent Markets’, American J. of Agricultural Economics 71 (3), 685–691.
Bishop, R. C. and Heberlein, T. A. (1979), ‘Measuring Values of Extra-Market Goods: Are Indirect Measures Biased?’, American J. of Agricultural Economics 61, 926–930.
Bockstael, N. E. and McConnel, K. E. (1983), ‘Welfare Measurement in the Household Production Framework’, American Economic Review 73, 806–814.
Bockstael, N. E., Hanemann, W. M., and Strand, I. E., Jr. (1984), ‘Benefit Analysis Using Indirect or Imputed Market Methods’, in U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Measuring the Benefits of Water Quality Improvements Using Recreation Demand Models, Volume II, Pub. # CR-811043-01-0, Draft. Washington, D.C.
Brookshire, D. S., Schulze, W. D., Thayer, M. A., and d'Arge, R. C. (1982), ‘Valuing Public Goods: A Comparison of Survey and Hedonic Approaches’, American Economic Review 72, 165–177.
Central Bureau of Statistics (1988), Statistical Monthly, April. Central Bureau of Statistics, Jerusalem.
Chestnut, L. G. and Violette, D. M. (1984), Estimates of Willingness to Pay for Pollution—Induced Changes in Morbidity: A Critique for Benefit-Cost Analysis of Pollution Regulation, U.S. EPA, Washington, D.C.
christensen, L. R., Jorgenson, D. W. and Lan, L. J. (1975), ‘Transcendental Logarithmic Utility Functions’, American Economic Review 65, 367–383.
Christensen, L. R. and Manser, M. E. (1977), ‘Estimating U.S. Consumer Preferences for Meat with Flexible Utility function’, Journal of Econometrics 5, 37–53.
Clawson, M. and Knetsch, J. L. (1966), Economics of Outdoor Recreation, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.
Cooper, B. S. and Rice, D. P. (1976), ‘The Economic Cost of Illness Revisited’, Social Security Bulletin 39, 21–36.
Cropper, M. L. (1981), ‘Measuring the Benefits from Reduced Morbidity’, American Economic Review 71, 235–240.
Cropper, M. L. and Freeman, A. M. III (1988), Monetizing Health Benefits, Prepared for the Congressional Research Service, The Library of Congress. Draft.
Cropper, M. L. and Krupnick, A. J. (1989), ‘The Social Costs of Chronic Heart and Lung Disease’. Proceedings of the AERE Workshop on Estimating and Valuing Morbidity in a Policy Context, Research Triangle Park, N.C.
Cummings, R. G., Brookshire, P. S., and Schulze, W. D. (1986), Valuing Environmental Goods — An Assessment of the Contingent Valuation Method, Rowman and Allenheld, Totowa, N.J..
Epstein, L., Shechter, M., and Cohen, A. (1989), Air Pollution and Health: An Epidemiological Study in an Exposed Population. Working Paper, Natural Resources and Environmental Research Center, University of Haifa, Haifa.
Feenberg, D. and Mills, E. S. (1980), Measuring the Benefits of Water Pollution Abatement, Academic Press, New York.
Fischhoff, B. and Furby, L. (1988), ‘Measuring Values: A Conceptual Framework for Interpreting Transactions with Special Reference to Contingent Valuation of Visibility’, J. of risk and Uncertainty 1, 147–184.
Freeman, A. M. III (1979), The Benefits of Environmental Improvement, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.
Freeman, A. M. III (1989), Valuing Individuals' Changes in Risk: A General Treatment, Discussion Paper QE89-08, Resources for the Future, Washington, D.C.
Gerking, S. and Stanley, L. R. (1986), ‘An Economic Analysis of Air Pollution and Health: The Case of St. Louis’, Review of Economics and Statistics 68, 115–121.
Gregory, R. (1986), ‘Interpreting Measures of Economic Loss: Evidence from Contingent Valuation Exprimental Studies’, J. of Environmental Economics & Management 13, 325–337.
Harrington, W. and Portney, P. R. (1987), ‘Valuing the Benefits of Health and Safety Regulation’, J. of Urban Economics 22, 101–112.
Harrison, D. and Rubinfeld, D. L. (1978), ‘Hednic Housing Prices and the Demand for Clean Air’, J. of Environmental Economics & Management 5, 81–102.
Hay, J. D. and Patel, M. S. (1983), ‘Preventive or Cure?’, J. of Health Economics 2, 117–140.
Hollander, M. and Wolfe, D. (1973), Nonparametric Statistical Methods, Wiley & Sons, New York.
Johansson, P. O. (1987), The Economic Theory and Measurement of Environmental Benefits, Cambridge University Press, London.
Jorgenson, D. W. and Slesnick, D. T. (1987), ‘Aggregate Consumer Behavior and Household Equivalence Scales’, J. Business & Economic Statistics 5, 219–232.
Just, R. E., Hueth, D. L. and Schmitz, A. (1982), Applied Welfare Economics and Public Policy, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.
Kahneman, D. and Tversky, A. (1979), ‘Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decisions Under Risk’, Economietrica 47, 263–291.
Kahneman, D., Knetsch, J. L., and Thaler, R. (1986), ‘Fairness as a Constraint on Profit Seeking: Entitlement in the Market’, American Economic Review 76, 728–741.
Knetsch, J. L. and Sinden, J. A. (1984), ‘Willingness to Pay and Compensation Demanded: Experimental Evidence of an Unexpected Disparity in Measures of Value’, Quarterly J. of Economics 94, 507–521.
Krutilla, J. V. and Fisher, A. C. (1975), The Economics of Natural Environments: Studies in the Valuation of Commodity and Amenity Resources, Johns Hopkins University Press for Resources for the Future, Baltimore.
Loehman, E. (1987), Measures of Welfare for Nonmarket Goods: Some Conceptual and Empirical Issues. Purdue University, Dept. of Agricultural Economics. Mimeo.
Loehman, E. and De, V. H. (1982), ‘Application of Stochastic Choice Modeling to Policy Analysis of Public Goods: A Case Study of Air Quality Improvements’, Review of Economics & Statistics 64, 474–480.
McConnell, K. E. (1985), ‘The Economics of Outdoor Recreation’, in A. V.Kneese and J. L.Sweeney, eds., Handbook of Natural Resource and Energy Economics, vol. 2. North-Holland, Amsterdam.
McFadden, D. (1973), ‘Conditional Logit Analysis of Qualitative Choice Behavior’, in P.Zarembka, ed., Frontiers in Econometrics, Academic Press, New York.
McMillan, M. L. and Amoako-Tuffour, J. (1988), ‘An Examination of Preferences for Local Public Sector Outputs’, Review of Economics and Statistics 70, 45–54.
Mäler, K. G. (1974), Environmental Economics: A Theoretical Inquiry, Published for Resources for the Future by. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.
Mitchell, R. C. and Carson, R. T. (1986), ‘Some Comments on the State of the Arts Assessment of the Contingent Valuation Method’, in Cummings R. G., Brookshire, P. S., and Schulze, W. D., Valuing Environmental Goods — An Assement of the Contingent Valuation Method, Rowman and Allenheld, Totowa, N.J.
Mitchell, R. C. and Carson, R. T. (1989), Using Surveys to Value Public Goods: The Contingent Valuation Method, Washington, D.C.: Resources for the Future.
Pearce, D. W. and Markandya, A. (1989), Environmental Policy Benefits: Monetary Valuation, O.E.C.D., Paris.
Pommerehne, W. W. (1988), ‘Measuring Environmental Benefits: a Comparison of Hedomic Technique and Contingent Valuation’, in Bös, D., Rose, M., and Seidl, C. eds., Welfare and Efficiency in Public Economics, Springer, Berlin.
Randall, A. (1987), Resource Economics, Wiley, New York.
Randall, A. and Stoll, J. R. (1980), ‘Consumer's Surplus in Commodity Space’, American Economic Review 70, 449–455.
Shapiro, P. and Smith, T. (1981), ‘Preferences for Nonmarket Goods Revealed Through Market Demands’, in Smith, K. V. ed., Advances in Applied Microeconomics 1, JAI Press, Greenwich, CN.
Shechter, M. (1988a), The Benefits of Morbidity Reduction from Air Pollution Control, Final Science Report, Natural Resource and Environmental Research Center, University of Haifa. Haifa.
Shechter, M. (1988b), ‘Incorporating Anxiety Induced by Environmental Episodes in Life Valuation’, in Maital, S. ed., Applied Behavioral Economics, Wheatsheaf Publishers, Brighton, UK.
Shechter, M., Kim, M., and Golan, L. (1989), ‘Valuation of a Public Good: Direct and Indirect Valuation Approaches to the Measurement of the Benefits from Pollution Abatement’, in H.Folmer, ed., Evaluation and Policy Making in Environmental Economics, Elsevier, Amsterdam.
Smith, V. K. (1987), ‘Nonuse Values in Benefit Cost Analysis’, Southern Economic Journal 54, 19–26.
Smith, V. K. and Krutilla, J. V. (1982), ‘Toward Reformulating the Role of Natural Resources in Economic Models’, in V. K.Smith and J. V.Krutilla, eds., Explorations in Natural Resource Economics, Johns Hopkins University Press for Resources for the Future, Baltimore.
Willig, R. D. (1976), ‘Consumer's Surplus without Apology’, American Economic Review 66, 589–97.
Zeidner, M. and Shechter, M. (1988), ‘Psychological Responses Towards Air Pollution: Some Personality and Demographic Correlates’, Journal of Environmental Psychology 8, 191–208.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Shechter, M. A comparative study of environmental amenity valuations. Environmental and Resource Economics 1, 129–155 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00310015
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00310015