Skip to main content
Log in

Prognostic factors for local recurrence in breast conservation therapy: Residual cancers after lumpectomy

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Surgery Today Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In order to evaluate the local residual cancer following breast conservation therapy (BCT) with lumpectomy, we investigated the relationships between residual cancer and age, tumor location, tumor diameter (T), mammography findings, nipple discharge findings, histopathological type, lymphatic and/or vascular invasion by tumor cells, histological grading, histological lymph node metastases (n), and estrogen receptor (ER) status, in 1494 patients with breast cancer that involved diagnostic excisional biopsy. Residual cancers were found in 581 of 1448 (40%) mastectomy specimens, after 46 (3.1%) with multicentricity had been excluded. No correlation was observed between residual cancer and age, histological grading, and ER. However, residual cancer rates were significantly higher in patients with: (1) tumor diameters of 3.1 cm or larger; (2) tumors beneath or in the vicinity of the nippleareola; (3) malignant calcifications noted in mammography findings; (4) serous or bloody nipple discharge, particularly with positive cytologic findings; (5) papillotubular carcinoma diagnosed by biopsy, (6) lymphatic invasion by tumor cells; or (7) a high degree (n≧4) of lymph node metastases. The above seven clinicopathologic factors are thus considered useful prognostic indicators for local recurrence in BCT with lumpectomy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Fukutomi T, Yamamoto H, Nanasawa T, Itabashi M, Ogino H, Tsukiyama I, Hirota T (1992) Histological and biological evaluation of preoperative radiotherapy on T1N0 breast carcinomas (in Japanese with English abstract). Nippon Geka Gakkai Zasshi (J Jpn Surg Soc) 93:183–188

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kasumi F, Iwase T, Yoshimoto M, Watanabe S (1989) Breast conservative management in Japan — from the surgeon's point of view (in Japanese with English abstract). Nyugan no Rinsho (Jpn J Breast Cancer) 4:482–488

    Google Scholar 

  3. NIH (1990) Consensus on treatment of early stage breast cancer: Less surgery, more research. J Natl Cancer Inst 82:1180–1181

    Google Scholar 

  4. Elston CW (1987) Grading of invasive carcinoma of the breast. In: Page DL, Anderson TJ (eds) Diagnostic histopathology of the breast. Churchill Livingstone, New York, pp 300–311

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bonadonna G, Veronesi U, Brambilla C, Ferrari L, Luini A, Grecco M, Bartoli C, De Yoldi G, Zucali R, Rilke F, Andoreola S, Silvestrini R, Di Fronzo G, Valagussa S (1990) Primary chemotherapy to avoid mastectomy in tumors with diameters of 3 cm or more. J Natl Cancer Inst 82:1539–1545

    Google Scholar 

  6. Haffty BG, Fischer D, Rose M, Beinfield M, McKhann C (1991) Prognostic factors for local recurrence in the conservatively treated breast cancer patient: A cautious interpretation of the data. J Clin Oncol 9:997–1003

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gallagher WJ, Koerner FC, Wood WC (1989) Treatment of intraductal carcinoma with limited surgery: Long-term follow-up. J Clin Oncol 7:376–380

    Google Scholar 

  8. Silverstein MJ, Waisman JR, Gierson ED (1991) Radiation therapy for intraductal carcinoma. Is it an equal alternative? Arch Surg 126:424–428

    Google Scholar 

  9. Holland R, Connolly JL, Gelmam R, Muravunac M, Hendriks JHCL, Verbeek ALM, Schnitt SJ, Silver B, Boyages J (1990) The presence of an extensive intraductal component following a limited excision correlates with prominent residual disease in the remainder of the breast. J Clin Oncol 8:113–118

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kurtz JM, Jacquemier J, Amalric R, Brandone H, Ayme Y, Hans D, Bressac C, Spitalier JM (1990) Breast-conserving therapy for macroscopically multiple cancers. Ann Surg 212:38–44

    Google Scholar 

  11. Fisher B, Bauer M, Margolese R (1985) Five-year results of a randomized clinical trial comparing total mastectomy and segmental mastectomy with or without radiation in the treatment of breast cancer. N Engl J Med 312:665–673

    Google Scholar 

  12. Stotter A, Atkinson EN, Fairston BA, Mcneese M, Oswald MJ, Balch CM (1990) Survival following locoregional recurrence after breast conservation therapy for cancer. Ann Surg 212:166–172

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fukutomi, T., Yamamoto, H., Nanasawa, T. et al. Prognostic factors for local recurrence in breast conservation therapy: Residual cancers after lumpectomy. Surg Today 23, 402–406 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00309497

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00309497

Key Words

Navigation