Skip to main content
Log in

Hemisphere specific effects in reasoning performance

  • Published:
Psychological Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Subjects frequently produce matching responses to Wason's selection problem. Some authors have proposed that such responses are a result of information processing functions which are lateralised to the right hemisphere and that compete with left hemisphere verbal/logical processes for the control of overt responding. Support for this position has come mainly from studies of patient populations. The present paper reports a series of experiments in which attempts were made to obtain similar confirmation from normal subjects using the technique of selective hemispheric interference. Subjects worked on the selection problem while concurrently performing a unimanual balancing task. Weak but persistent effects of hemispheric interference on the pattern of responses th the selection porblem were observed. In general, the data are consistent with the hypothesis that matching responses reflect right hemisphere processing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bracewell, R.J., & Hidi, S.E. (1974). The solution of an inferential problem as a function of stimulus materials. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 26, 480–488.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, J. St.B. T. (1982). The Psychology of Deductive Reasoning. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, J. St.B. T., & Dennis, I. (1982). Brain lesions and reasoning: a note on Golding, Cortex, 18, 317–318

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, J. St.B. T., & Lynch, J.S. (1973). Matching bias in the selection task. British Journal of Psychology, 64, 391–397.

    Google Scholar 

  • Golding, E., Reich, S.S., & Wason, P.C. (1974). Inter-hemispheric differences in problem solving. Perception, 3, 231–235.

    Google Scholar 

  • Golding, E. (1981). The effect of unilateral brain lesion on reasoning. Cortex, 17, 31–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hellige, J.B., & Longstreth, L.E. (1981). Effects of concurrent hemisphere-specific activity on unimanual tapping rate. Neuropsychologia, 19, 395–405.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kinsbourne, M. (1970). The control of attention by interaction between the cerebral hemispheres. In A.F. Sanders (Ed.) Attention and Performance III. Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manktelow, K., & Evans, J. St.B. T. (1979). Facilitation of reasoning by realism: effect or non-effect? British Journal of Psychology, 70, 477–488.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal, R. (1978). Combining the results of independent studies. Psychological Bulletin, 85, 185–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wason, P.C. (1966). Reasoning. In B.M. Foss (Ed.) New Horizons in Psychology. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wason, P.C. (1968). Reasoning about a rule. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 20, 273–281.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

These experiments were reported at the Oxford meeting of the Experimental Psychology Society, 1983

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gellatly, A.R.H. Hemisphere specific effects in reasoning performance. Psychol. Res 47, 217–221 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00309449

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00309449

Keywords

Navigation