Summary
This article reports three experiments that deal with the source of the difficulty of Wason's (1977) THOG problem. The solution of this problem demands both the postulation of hypotheses and a combinatorial analysis of their consequences. Experiment 1 showed that the generation of the hypotheses is not in itself sufficient to solve the problem. Experiment 2 showed that a version presenting a plausible context for separating the level of data from that of hypotheses produced a better performance than both the original abstract version and a thematic version lacking the plausible context separating the levels. Experiment 3 gave evidence that this context can produce facilitation even with the geometric material of the classic version. This experiment also showed that a pictorial presentation of data and a verbal presentation of hypotheses affect performance negatively. The results demonstrate the role of problem representation in problem solving, and, in particular, the role of homogeneity in representing data and hypotheses in hypothetico-deductive reasoning.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bruner, J. S., Goodnow, J. J., & Austin, G. A. (1956). A study of thinking. New York: Wiley.
Cheng, P. W., & Holyoak, K. J. (1985). Pragmatic reasoning schemas. Cognitive Psychology, 17, 391–416.
Evans, J. St B. T. (1982). The psychology of deductive reasoning. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Evans, J. St B. T. (1984). Heuristic and analytical processes in reasoning. British Journal of Psychology, 75, 451–468.
Griggs, R. A., & Newstead, S. E. (1982). The role of problem structure in a deductive reasoning task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 8, 297–307.
Griggs, R. A., & Newstead, S. E. (1983). The source of intuitive errors in Wason's THOG problem. British Journal of Psychology, 74, 451–459.
Griggs, R. A., & Randall, S. (1986). Scientists and the selection task. Social Studies of Science, 16, 319–330.
Jackson, S. L., & Griggs, R. A. (1988). Education and the selection task. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 76, 327–330.
Johnson-Laird, P. N., & Wason, P. C. (1970) Insight into a logical relation. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 22, 49–61.
Ketchum, R. D., & Bourne, L. E. (1980). Stimulus-rule interactions in concept verification. American Journal of Psychology, 93, 5–23.
Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Meddis, R. (1984) Statistics using ranks: A unified approach. Oxford: Blackwell.
Newstead, S. E., Griggs, R. A., & Warner, S. A. (1982). The effects of realism on Wason's THOG problem. Psychological Research, 44, 85–96.
Nisbett, R. E. & Ross, L. (1980). Human inference: Strategies and shortcomings of social judgements. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
Oakhill, J. V. & Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1985). Rationality, memory, and search for counterexamples. Cognition, 20, 79–84.
Smyth, M. M., & Clark, S. E. (1986). My half-sister is a THOG: Strategic processes in a reasoning task. British Journal of Psychology, 77, 257–287.
Wason, P. C. (1977). Self-contradictions. In P. N. Johnson-Laird & P. C. Wason (Eds), Thinking: Readings in cognitive science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wason, P. C. (1978). Hypothesis testing and reasoning. Unit 25, Block 4, Cognitive Psychology. Milton Keynes: Open University.
Wason, P. C., & Brooks, P. G. (1979). THOG: The anatomy of a problem. Psychological Research, 41, 79–90.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Girotto, V., Legrenzi, P. Mental representation and hypothetico-deductive reasoning: The case of the THOG problem. Psychol. Res 51, 129–135 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00309308
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00309308