Summary
The primary goal of Schulze and Schuster's (1977) experiment was to test Massaro's (1972) hypothesis that the rate of processing of the auditory image after the tone is turned off is equal to the rate of processing the stimulus code while the stimulus is present. The experiment was unsuccessful, however, since the authors did not take into account corresponding changes in the asymptote parameter of the model with changes in stimulus duration. This review discusses the problem in detail along with a general discussion of model testing and appropriate experimental procedure.
References
Anderson, N.H.: Comparison of different populations: Resistance to extinction and transfer. Psychol. Rev. 70, 162–179 (1963)
Eriksen, C.W., Eriksen, B.A.: Visual perceptual processing rates and backward and forward masking. J. exp. Psychol. 89, 306–313 (1971)
Haber, R.N., Nathanson, L.S.: Processing of sequentially presented letters. Perception and Psychophysics, 5, 359–361 (1969)
Massaro, D.W.: Stimulus information vs processing time in auditory pattern recognition. Perception and Psychophysics, 12, 50–56 (1972)
Massaro, D.W.: Experimental psychology and information processing. Chicago: Rand McNally 1975
Massaro, D.W., Cohen, M.M., Idson, W.L.: Recognition masking of auditory lateralization and pitch judgments. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 59, 432–441 (1976)
Massaro, D.W., Idons, W.L.: Temporal course of perceived auditory duration. Perception and Psychophysics, 20, 331–352 (1976)
Schulze, H.H., Schuster, B.: Stimulus information and processing time in pitch perception. Psychol. Res. 39, 267–276 (1977)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This research was supported by Public Health Service Grant MH-19399. Wendy L. Idson provided valuable comments. Requests for offprints should be sent to Dominic W. Massaro, Department of Psychology, University of Wisconsin, Johnson at Charter Streets, Madison, Wisconsin 53706, USA
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Massaro, D.W. Rate of perceptual processing. Psychol. Res 39, 277–283 (1977). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00309292
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00309292