Summary
A theoretical and empirical investigation was undertaken to investigate the role of surface texture in ecological optics. Forty-nine subjects each viewed a set of 30 professionally produced photographs of rectangular samples of surface textures. The photographs included common textures such as sand, fur, rock, and so forth. These photographs were flat and, therefore, these static surfaces provide only a fraction of the information afforded by normal textures. Subjects answered questions about the identity, physical properties, and viewing conditions of each texture. Correct identifications were made in about two-thirds of the cases. When no identification, or an incorrect one, was given, subjects were still able to identify physical state (solid, liquid, gas), planarity (planar, rough), and pigmentation (homogeneous, uneven) at a better than chance level, though hardness could not be accurately assessed. Diffuseness versus directionality of incident light could be distinguished, though mistakes were more frequent on this discrimination. The direction of incident light, in cases where it was sharply defined, could be determined accurately for only a few cases of rough textures; in some others, light was reported as incident from either the correct side or its 180° opposite — a “polarization effect”. Most subjects correctly detected the orientation of textures photographed in the frontal plane, but only a few textures' slants were accurately perceived. The results are interpreted in terms of properties of substances as specified by invariants of the optic way.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Beck, J. (1982). Texture segmentation. In J. Beck (Ed.), Organization and representation in perception (pp. 285–317). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Brodatz, P. (1966). Textures. New York: Dover.
Flock, H. R. (1964). A possible optical basis for monocular slant perception. Psychological Review, 71, 380–391.
Gibson, E. J., Owsley, C. J., Walker, A. S., & Megaw-Nyce, J. (1979). Development of the perception of invariants, substance and shape. Perception, 8, 609–619.
Gibson, E. J., & Walker, A. S. (1984). Development of knowledge of visual-tactual affordance of substance. Child Development, 55, 453–460.
Gibson, J. J. (1929). The reproduction of visually perceived forms. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 12, 1–29.
Gibson, J. J. (1950a). The perception of visual surfaces. American Journal of Psychology, 63, 367–384.
Gibson, J. J. (1950b). The perception of the visual world. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.
Gibson, J. J. (1963). The useful dimensions of sensitivity. American Journal of Psychology, 18, 1–15.
Gibson, J. J. (1966). The senses considered as perceptual systems. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.
Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.
Gibson, J. J. (1982). What is involved in surface perception? In J. Beck (Ed.), Organization and representation in perception. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Gibson, J. J., & Cornsweet, J. (1952). The perceived slant of visual surfaces — optical and geographical. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 44, 11–15.
Gibson, J. J., & Dibble, F. N. (1952). Exploratory experiments on the stimulus conditions for the perception of a visual surface. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 43, 414–419.
Gibson, J. J., & Waddell, D. (1952). Homogeneous retinal stimulation and visual perception. American Journal of Psychology, 65, 263–270.
Gibson, J. J., Olum, P., & Rosenblatt, F. (1955). Parallax and perspective during aircraft landings. American Journal of Psychology, 68, 372–285.
Gibson, J. J., Purdy, J., & Lawrence, L. (1955). A method of controlling stimulation for the study of space perception: The optical tunnel. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 50, 1–14.
Julesz, B. (1965). Experiments in the visual perception of texture. Scientific American, 232, 34–43.
Julesz, B. (1971). Foundations of cyclopean perception. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Katz, D. (1925). Der Aufbau der Tastwelt. Leipzig: Barth.
Koffka, H. (1935). Principles of gestalt psychology. Orlando, Fl: Harcourt Brace.
Metzger, W. (1930). Gesetze des Sehens. Frankfurt: Waldemar Kramer.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
The empirical work described here was done at Cornell University in 1967, and a draft manuscript was written by the two authors. At that time the second author moved to Stanford University, and the manuscript was forgotten. It was found when the second author moved to the University of Bielefeld, Center for Interdisciplinary Studies, in 1984–1985. The paper was revised and presented at the Conference on Event Perception in Uppsala, Sweden, in July 1985, with the kind permission and assistance of Prof. E. J. Gibson. The second author thanks E. J. Gibson and T. Stoffregen for reviews and suggestions based on an earlier draft of the manuscript
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gibson, J.J., Bridgeman, B. The visual perception of surface texture in photographs. Psychol. Res 49, 1–5 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00309196
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00309196