Skip to main content
Log in

Spatial attention in vision

Evidence for early selection

  • Published:
Psychological Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Human observers can selectively allocate processing resources to different areas of the visual field within a single fixation. This spatial attention system may affect either the quality of information extraction or the decisions and responses based on this information. This paper reviews evidence from behavioral, single-unit, and event-related potential paradigms; the evidence suggests a relatively “early” locus of spatial attention.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allport, D. A. (1987). Selection for action: Some behavioral and neurophysiological considerations of attention and action. In H. Heuer & A. F. Sanders (Eds.), Perspectives on Perception and Action. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allport, D. A., Antonis B., & Reynolds P. (1972). On the division of attention: A disproof of the single channel hypothesis. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 24, 225–235.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allport, D. A., Tipper S. P., & Chmiel, N. R. J. (1985). Perceptual integration and postcategorical filtering. In M. I. Posner & O. S. M. Marin (Eds), Mechanisms of Attention: Attention and Performance XI (pp. 107–132). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broadbent D. (1982). Task combination and selective intake of information. Acta Psychologica, 50, 253–290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, F. W., & Maffei L. (1974). Contrast and spatial frequency. Scientific American, 231, 106–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowey, A. (1985). Aspects of cortical organization related to selective attention and selective impairments of visual perception: A tutorial review. In M. I. Posner & O. S. M. Marin (Eds.), Mechanisms of Attention: Attention and Performance XI (pp. 41–62). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dark, V. J, Johnston, W. A, Myles-Worsley, M., & Farah M. J (1985). Levels of selection and capacity limits. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 114, 472–497.

    Google Scholar 

  • Downing, C. J., & Pinker, S. (1985). The spatial structure of visual attention. In M. I Posner & O. S. M. Marin (Eds.), Mechanisms of Attention: Attention and Performance XI (pp. 171–187). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan-Johnson, C. (1981). P300 latency: A new metric of information processing. Psychophysiology, 18, 207–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eason, R. G., Oakley, M., & Flowers, L. (1983). Central neural influences on the human retina during selective attention. Physiological Psychology, 11, 18–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Egeth, H. E., Virzi, R. A., & Garbart, H. (1984). Searching for conjunctively defined targets. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10, 32–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eriksen, C. W., & Hoffman, J. E. (1973). The extent of processing of noise elements during selecting encoding from visual displays. Perception & Psychophysics, 14, 155–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, J. A., & Ballard, D. H. (1983). Computing with connections. In J. Beck, B. Hope & A. Rosenfeld (Eds.), Human and Machine Vision (pp. 107–155). New York, NY: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, B., & Boch, R. (1981). Enhanced activation of neurones in prelunate cortex before visually guided saccades of trained Rhesus monkeys. Experimental Brain Research, 44, 129–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, D. L. (1982). Limited-channel models of automatic detection: Capacity and scanning in visual search. Psychological Review, 89, 662–692.

    Google Scholar 

  • Francolini, C. M., & Egeth, H. A. (1979). Perceptual selectivity is task dependent: The pop-out effect poops out. Perception & Psychophysics, 25, 99–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Francolini, C. M., & Egeth, H. A. (1980). On the nonautomaticity of “automatic” activation: Evidence of selective seeing. Perception & Psychophysics, 27, 331–342.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen J. C., & Hillyard, S. (1983). Selective attention to multidimensional auditory stimuli in man. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 9, 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillyard, S. A., & Kutas, M. (1983). Electrophysiology of cognitive processing. Annual Review of Psychology, 34, 33–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillyard, S. A., & Munte, T. F. (1984). Selective attention to color and location: An analysis with event-related brain potentials. Perception & Psychophysics, 36, 185–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillyard, S. A., Munte, T. F., & Neville, H. J. (1985). Visual-spatial attention, orienting and brain physiology. In M. I. Posner & O. S. M. Marin (Eds.), Mechanisms of Attention: Attention and Performance XI (pp. 63–84). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirst, W., Spelke, E. S., Reaves, C. C., Caharack, G., & Neisser, U. (1980). Dividing attention without alteration or automaticity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 109, 98–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, J. E. (1975). Hierarchical stages in the processing of visual information. Perception & Psychophysics, 18, 348–354.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, J. E. (1978). Search through a sequentially presented visual display. Perception & Psychophysics, 23, 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, J. E. (1979). A two-stage model of visual search. Perception & Psychophysics, 25, 319–327.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, J. E., Houck, M. R., MacMillan, F. W., Simons, R. F., & Oatman, J. C. (1985). Event-related potentials elicited by automatic targets: A dual-task analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 11, 50–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, J. E., & MacMillan, F. W. (1985). Is semantic priming automatic? In M. I. Posner & O. S. M. Marin (Eds.) Mechanisms of Attention: Attention and Performance XI (pp. 567–583). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, J. E., & Nelson, B. (1981a). Spatial selectivity in visual search. Perception & Psychophysics, 30, 283–290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, J. E., & Nelson, B. (1981b). The nature and role of attentional resources in controlled and automatic detection: A final report. University of Delaware, Department of Psychology, Research Report No. 8103.

  • Hoffman, J. E., Nelson, B., & Houck, M. R. (1983a). The role of attentional resources in automatic detection. Cognitive Psychology, 15, 379–410.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, J. E., Simons, R. F., & Houck, M. R. (1983b). A comparison of P300 components elicited in automatic and controlled detection tasks. Psychophysiology, 20, 625–631.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holender, D. (1985). Semantic activation without conscious identification in dichotic listening, parafoveal vision, and visual masking: A survey and appraisal. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 9, 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Houck, M. R., & Hoffman, J. E. (1986). Conjunction of color and form without attention: Evidence from an orientation-contigent color aftereffect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 12, 186–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Isreal, J. B., Chesney, G. L., Wickens, C. D., & Donchin, E. (1980). P300 and tracking difficulty: Evidence for multiple resources in dual-task performance. Psychophysiology, 17, 259–273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Isreal, J. B., Wickens, C. D., Chesney, G. L., & Donchin, E. (1980). The event-related brain potential as an index of display-monitoring workload. Human Factors, 22, 211–224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, W. A., & Dark, V. J. (1982). In defense of intraperceptual theories of attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 8, 407–421.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, W. A., & Dark, V. J. (1985). Dissociable domains of selective processing. In M. I. Posner & O. S. M. Marin, (Eds.), Mechanism of Attention: Attention and Performance XI (pp. 567–583). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Julesz, B., & Bergen, J. R. (1983). Textons, the fundamental elements in preattentive vision and perception of textures. Bell System Technical Journal, 62, 1619–1645.

    Google Scholar 

  • Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1980). A theory of reading: From eye-fixations to comprehension. Psychological Review, 87, 329–354.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D., & Henik, A. (1981). Perceptual organization and attention. In M. Kubovy & J. R. Pomerantz (Eds.), Perceptual Organization. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D., & Treisman, A. (1984). Changing views of attention & automaticity. In R. Parasuraman & D. R. Davies (Eds.), Varieties of Attention (pp. 29–61). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCollough, C. (1965). Color adaptation of edge-detectors in the human visual system. Science, 149, 1115–1116.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGurk, H., & MacDonald, J. (1976). Hearing lips and seeing voices. Nature, 264, 746–748.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mishkin, M., Ungerleider, L. G., & Macko, K. A. (1983). Object vision and spatial vision: Two cortical pathways. Trends in Neuroscience, 6, 414–417.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moran, J., & Desimone, R. (1985). Selective attention gates visual processing in the extrastriate cortex. Science, 229, 782–784.

    Google Scholar 

  • Näätänen, R. (1982). Processing negativity: An evoked-potential reflection of selective attention. Psychological Bulletin, 92, 605–640.

    Google Scholar 

  • Näätänen, R. (1985). Stimulus processing: Reflections in event-related potentials, magnetoencephalogram, and regional cerebral blood flow. In M. I. Posner & O. S. M. Marin (Eds.), Mechanisms of Attention: Attention and Performance XI (pp. 355–373). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Navon, D. (1985). Attention division or attention sharing? In M. I. Posner & O. S. M. Marin (Eds.), Mechanisms of Attention: Attention and Performance XI (pp. 133–146). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neisser, U., Novick, R., & Lazar, R. (1963). Searching for ten targets simultaneously. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 17, 955–962.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neumann, O. (1984). Automatic processing: A review of recent findings and a plea for an old theory. In W. Prinz & A. F. Sanders (Eds.), Cognition and Motor Processes. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nissen, M. J. (1985). Accessing features and objects: Is location special? In M. I. Posner, & O. S. M. Marin (Eds.), Mechanisms of Attention: Attention and Performance XI (pp. 205–219). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pashler, H., & Badgio, P. C. (1985). Visual attention and stimulus identification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 11, 105–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Posner, M. I., Walker, J. A., Friedrich, F. J., & Rafal, R. D. (1984). Effects of parietal lobe injury on covert orienting of visual attention. Journal of Neuroscience, 4, 1863–1874.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pritchard, W. S. (1981). Psychophysiology of P300. Psychological Bulletin, 89, 506–540.

    Google Scholar 

  • Regan, D. (1982). Visual information channeling in normal and dis-ordered vision. Psychological Review, 89, 407–444.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, M., & Summerfield, Q. (1981). Audio-visual adaptation in speech perception. Perception & Psychophysics, 30, 309–314.

    Google Scholar 

  • Savoy, R. L. (1984). “Extinction” of the McCollough effect does not transfer interocularly. Perception & Psychophysics, 36, 571–576.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sawusch, J. R., & Jusczyk, P. (1981). Adaptation and contrast in the perception of voicing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 7, 408–421.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, W., Dumais, S. T., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1984). Automatic and controlled processing and attention. In R. Parasuraman & D. R. Davies (Eds.) Varieties of Attention. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, W., & Fisk, A. D. (1984). Automatic category search and its transfer. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 10: 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, W., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1977). Controlled and automatic human information processing. I. Detection, search and attention. Psychological Review, 84, 1–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaffer, L. H. (1975). Multiple attention in continuous verbal tasks. In P. M. A. Rabbitt, & S. Dornic (Eds.), Attention and Performance V. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shiffrin, R. M. (1985). Attention. In R. C. Atkinson, R. J. Herrnstein, G. Lindsey, & R. D. Luce (Eds.), Stevens' Handbook of Experimental Psychology. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shiffrin, R., & Schneider, W. (1977). Controlled and automatic human information processing. II. Perceptual learning, automatic attending, and a general theory. Psychological Review, 84, 127–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stromeyer, C. F., III (1978). Form-color aftereffects in human vision. In R. Held, H. W. Leibowitz, & H. L. Teuber (Eds.), Handbook of Sensory Physiology, Vol. VIII, Perception (pp. 97–142). Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Treisman, A. (1982). Perceptual grouping and attention in visual search for features and for objects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 8, 194–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Treisman, A. (1985). Preattentive processing in vision. Computer Vision, Graphics, and Image Processing, 31, 156–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Treisman, A., & Gelade, G. (1980). A feature-integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 97–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Treisman, A., & Schmidt, H. (1982). Illusory conjunctions in the perception of objects. Cognitive Psychology, 14, 107–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walters, D., Biederman, I., & Weisstein, N. (1983). The combination of spatial frequency and orientation is not effortlessly perceived. Supplement to Investigative Opthalmology and Visual Science, 24, 238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wurtz, R. H., Goldberg, M. E., & Robinson, D. L. (1980). Behavioral modulation of visual responses in the monkey: Stimulus selection for attention and movement. Progress in Psychobiology and Physiological Psychology, 9, 43–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wurtz, R. J., & Mohler, C. W. (1976). Enhancement of visual response in monkey striate cortex and frontal eye fields. Journal of Neurophysiology, 39, 766–772.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This research was supported by the U. S. Army Research Office under contract DAAG 29-83-K-0049. Portions of this paper were presented to the Conference on Attention and Action, Bielefeld, West Germany, in July 1985

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hoffman, J.E. Spatial attention in vision. Psychol. Res 48, 221–229 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00309086

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00309086

Keywords

Navigation