Skip to main content
Log in

Modes of biliobiliary anastomosis in relation to the healing process and occurrence of postoperative stricture

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Surgery Today Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The inverting and everting methods of biliobiliary anastomoses were compared histopathologically and electron microscopically. Epithelialization started on the 3rd post-operative day and occurred within 8 mm of the anastomosis with an earlier and more active epithelialization being seen in the proximal area than in the distal. A rapid decrease of the mucosal defect was seen for 3–5 days which slowed down thereafter, and closure was achieved by 30 days after the anastomosis in both groups. The everted group showed a smoother and more rapid healing process, quicker epithelialization, and less mucosal defects than the inverted group. In the chronic phase, the inverted group showed more papillary hyperplasia and more pronounced fibrosis of the wall. The stricture index, being the internal circumference of the common bile duct: proximal×2/anastomosis site + duodenal×100, of the everted group was 123.7% compared to 146.7% for the inverted group, but there was no statistical difference. There was no difference in the total area of crypts, representing the epithelialization, between the two groups. Anastomoses with proximal dilatation therefore healed more slowly than those without dilatation. These findings show everted anastomosis to be superior to inverted anastomosis and thus support the usefulness of T-tube drainage to prevent post-operative dilatation of the bile duct.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kune GA, Sali A (1981) The practice of biliary surgery. Black Scientific Publications, Oxford, pp 192–244

    Google Scholar 

  2. Blumgart LH (1988) Section 8. Biliary stricture and fistula. Benign biliary strictures. In: Blumgart LH (ed) The surgery of the liver and biliary tract. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh 58:721–752

    Google Scholar 

  3. Moosa AR, Mayer AD, Stabile B (1990) Iatrogenic injury to the bile duct. Who, How, Where? Arch Surg 125:1028–1031

    Google Scholar 

  4. Klopper PJ, Kelly KA, Vos A (1968) Experimental anastomoses of the common bile duct. Surgery 63:459–463

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cattell RB, Braasch JW (1959) Two-stage repairs of benign strictures of the bile duct. Surg Gynecol Obstet 109:691–696

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cosman B, Porter MR (1960) Benign stricture of the bile ducts. Ann Surg 152:730–742

    Google Scholar 

  7. Mason LB, Sidnury JB, Guiang S (1954) Rupture of extrahepatic bile duct from nonoperating trauma. Ann Surg 140:234–241

    Google Scholar 

  8. Blumgart LH, Kelley CJ, Benjamin IS (1984) Benign bile duct stricture following cholecystectomy: Critical factors in management. Br J Surg 71:836–843

    Google Scholar 

  9. Andren-Sandberg A, Johansson S, Bengmark S (1985) Accidental lesions of the common bile duct at cholecystectomy. II. Results of treatment. Ann Surg 201:452–455

    Google Scholar 

  10. Atik M, Castleberry JW, Cohn Jr. I (1958) Common bile duct anastomosis: An experimental study. Surgery 45:535–542

    Google Scholar 

  11. Deaver JB (1904) Hepatic drainage. Br Med J 2:821–825

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kune GA, Hardy JH, Brown G, McKenzie G (1969) Operative injuries of the bile ducts. Med J Aust 2:233–236

    Google Scholar 

  13. Warren KW, Poulantzas JK, Kune GA (1966) Use of a Y-tube splint in the repair of biliary strictures. Surg Gynecol Obstet 122:785–790

    Google Scholar 

  14. Harridge WH (1953) Alterations in common bile duct stricture formation by proximal decompression. Surg Forum 3:411–416

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lary BG, Scheibe JR (1952) The effect of rubber tubing on the healing of common duct anastomoses. Surgery 32:789–795

    Google Scholar 

  16. Madden JL, McCann WJ (1961) Reconstruction of the common bile duct by end-to-end anastomosis without an internal splint or stent support. Surg Gynecol Obstet 112:305–314

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kawakami, K., Yamaguchi, K., Kishikawa, H. et al. Modes of biliobiliary anastomosis in relation to the healing process and occurrence of postoperative stricture. Surg Today 23, 51–57 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00309000

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00309000

Key Words

Navigation