Summary
When judging in stereoscopic vision whether an object is lying in front of or behind the point of momentary fixation, the visual system extracts depth information by using retinal disparity; in this case it computes one angular difference between retinal images (simple positional disparity). But if the task is to discriminate two or more objects in their depth (relative to the point of fixation) and the relative distances between them, two or more such angular differences have to be determined (relative positional disparity). An investigation was carried out to determine whether depth extraction is more complex for relative distances than for object positions and therefore demands a longer processing time. For this purpose stimuli with simple and relative positional disparity were foveally and parafoveally presented (each followed by a masking stimulus). It was shown that the duration threshold for the detection of stimuli with relative disparity was about 2.5 times larger than that for stimuli with simple disparity (Exp. 1). This difference could not be attributed to differences in stimulus configuration between simple and relative disparity (Exp. 2). The results are discussed in terms of a serial, hierarchically structured, disparity processing.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bishop, P.O.: Neurophysiology of binocular vision and stereopsis. In: Handbook of sensory physiology, central processing of visual information, Jung, R. (ed.) Vol. VII/3A. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer 1973
Blakemore, C.: Binocular depth discrimination and the naso-temporal division. J. Physiol. (Lond.) 205, 471–497 (1969)
Blakemore, C.: The range and scope of binocular depth discrimination in man. J. Physiol. (Lond.) 211, 599–622 (1970a)
Blakemore, C.: The representation of three-dimensional visual space in the cat's striate cortex. J. Physiol. (Lond.) 209, 155–178 (1970b)
Blakemore, C.: A new kind of stereoscopic vision. Vision Res. 10, 1181–1199 (1970c)
Blakemore, C., Fiorentini, A., Maffei, L.: A second neural mechanism of binocular depth discrimination. J. Physiol. (Lond.) 226, 725–749 (1972)
Dick, A.O.: Iconic memory and its relation to perceptual processing and other memory mechanisms. Percept. Psychophys. 16, 575–596 (1974)
Foley, J.M., Richards, W.: Effects of voluntary eye movement and convergence on the binocular appreciation of depth. Percept. Psychophys. 11, 423–427 (1972)
Kalveram, K.Th.: Das Marburger System. 1. Teil: Das Digital System. Ber. Inst. Psychol. Univ. Marburg 44 (1975)
Leibowitz, H., Mote, F.A., Thurlow, W.R.: Simultaneous contrast as a function of separation between test and inducing fields. J. Exp. Psychol. 46, 453–456 (1953)
Pettigrew, J.D., Nikara, T., Bishop, P.O.: Responses to moving slits by single units in cat striate cortex. Exp. Brain Res. 6, 373–390 (1968)
Regan., D., Beverley, K., Cynader, M.: The visual perception of motion in depth. Sci. Am. 241/1, 122–133 (1979)
Ritter, M.: Perception of depth: Processing of simple positional disparity as a function of viewing distance. Percept. Psychophys. 25, 209–214 (1979a)
Ritter, M.: Wahrnehmung dynamischer stereoskopischer Reize: Entsteht räumliche Tiefe auf Grund der Auswertung von Geschwindigkeitsquerdisparation? Ber. Fachbereich Psychol. Univ. Marburg, 74 (1979b)
Scheerer, E.: Integration, interruption and processing rate in visual backward masking. Psychol. Forsch. 36, 71–93 (1973)
Von der Heydt, R., Adorjani, C.: Orientation disparity versus position disparity: Different stereoscopic mechanisms. Paper presented at the 19th Conference of German Experimental Psychologists, Konstanz (1977)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ritter, M. Perception of depth: Different processing times for simple and relative positional disparity. Psychol. Res 41, 285–295 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00308874
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00308874