Skip to main content
Log in

Why do Socratic stimuli produce hypermnesia?

  • Published:
Psychological Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Socratic stimuli, giving a description of a word without presenting the word itself, increase recall as a function of retention interval (see the studies on hypermnesia in Erdelyi, Buschke, & Finkelstein, 1977). In the present study, one lengthy recall task (20 min) or four consecutive recall trials of 5 min followed the presentation of either Socratic descriptions of words or words themselves, which were either of high or low imagery value (Experiment 1). The recall task used the impaired feedback technique (Gardiner, Passmore, Herriot, & Klee, 1977) leaving the already retrieved items unavailable during the remaining time of the recall trial or trials. The nature of the recall task did not affect recall performance, and only Socratic descriptions of high imagery words produced a recall increase. In Experiment 2, two possible sources of hypermnesia with Socratic stimuli were further explored: imagery and the generation effect. Generation failed to produce hypermnesia, while Socratic descriptions of high and low imagery words produced significant effects. Moreover, high imagery words without Socratic descriptions also led to hypermnesia. An encoding context that improves a unique semantic processing is likely to be critical for obtaining hypermnesia.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Buxton, C. E. (1943). The status of research in reminiscence. Psychological Bulletin, 40, 313–340.

    Google Scholar 

  • Craik, F. I. M., & Lockhart, R. S. (1972). Levels of processing: A framework for memory research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11, 671–684.

    Google Scholar 

  • d'Ydewalle, G., & Haentjens, G. (1986). Ebbinghaus (1885) revisited: A recall increase as a function of test trials. In F. Klix & H. Hagendorf (Eds.), Human memory and cognitive capabilities: Mechanisms and performance (pp. 97–108). Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ebbinghaus, H. (1885). Über das Gedächtnis. Leipzig: Duncker & Humblot.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ebbinghaus, H. (1897). Grundzüge der Psychologie. Leipzig: Veit.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erdelyi, M. H., Buschke, H., & Finkelstein, S. (1977). Hypermnesia for Socratic stimuli: The growth of recall for an internally generated memory list abstracted from a series of riddles. Memory & Cognition, 5, 283–286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erdelyi, M. H., Finkelstein, S., Herrell, N., Miller, B., & Thomas, J. (1976). Coding modality vs. input modality in hypermnesia: Is a rose a rose a rose? Cognition, 4, 311–319.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardiner, J. M., Passmore, C., Herriot, P., & Klee, H. (1977). Memory for remembered events: Effects of response mode and response-produced feedback. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 16, 45–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graf, P. (1980). Two consequences of generating: Increased inter- and intra-word organization of sentences. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19, 316–327.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haentjens, G. (1984). Hypermnesie bij Socratische stimuli. Doctoral dissertation, University of Leuven, Leuven.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janssen, W. H. (1973). Voorstelbaarheidswaarden van 327 zelfstandige naamwoorden (Imagery values of 327 names). Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Psychologie, 28, 465–475.z Kruyskamp, C. (1976). Van Dale's groot woordenboek der Nederlandse taal (Van Dale's dictionary of Dutch language). 's Gravenhage: Martinus Nijhoff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lammens, L., & d'Ydewalle, G. (1983). Encoding questions and word retrieval. American Journal of Psychology, 96, 3–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murdock, B. B. (1974). Human memory: Theory and data. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pellegrino, J. W. (1971). A general measure of organization in free recall for variable unit size and internal sequential consistency. Behavior Research Methods & Instrumentation, 3, 241–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roediger III, H. L., & Thorpe, L. A. (1978). The role of recall time in producing hypermnesia. Memory & Cognition, 6, 296–305.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegel, S. (1956). Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slamecka, N. J., & Graf, P. (1978). The generation effect: Delineation of a phenomenon. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 4, 592–604.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Haentjens, G., d'Ydewalle, G. Why do Socratic stimuli produce hypermnesia?. Psychol. Res 49, 169–172 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00308683

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00308683

Keywords

Navigation