Skip to main content
Log in

Accessing lexical ambiguity: Effects of context and dominance

  • Published:
Psychological Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The paper examines the effects of sentential context and frequency of meaning (dominance) on the lexical access of ambiguous words. Two experiments were carried out using Swinney's (1979) cross-modal paradigm. The sentential contexts were constructed in such a way as to make salient the most characteristic features of either the dominant (Experiment 1) or the secondary (Experiment 2) meaning of the ambiguous word. The claim was that if context is sufficiently constraining selective access of the congruent meaning can be obtained. Consistent with this prediction, context biasing the dominant meaning facilitated lexical decision only on target words related to the dominant meaning. When context biased the secondary meaning, both context and dominance produced a facilitation effect.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barclay, J. R., Bransford, J. D., Franks, J. J., McCarrell, N. S., & Nitsch, K. (1974). Comprehension and semantic flexibility. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 13, 471–481.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, C. A. (1980). Semantic context effects in visual word recognition: An analysis of semantic strategies. Memory & Cognition, 6, 644–652.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biederman, I. (1981). On the semantics of a glance at a scene. In M. Kubovy & J. M. Pomerantz (Eds.), Perceptual organization. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cairns, H. S., & Kamerman, J. (1975). Lexical information processing during sentence comprehension. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 14, 170–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, H. H. (1973). The language-as-fixed-effect fallacy: A critique of language statistics in psychological research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 12, 335–359.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conrad, C. (1974). Context effects in sentence comprehension: a study of the subjective lexicon. Memory & Cognition, 2, 130–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dooling, D. J. (1972). Some context effects in the speeded comprehension of sentences. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 93, 56–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischler, I., & Bloom, P. A. (1979). Automatic and attentional processes in the effects of sentence contexts on word recognition. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18, 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forster, K. I. (1976). Accessing the mental lexicon. In R. J. Wales & E. Walker (Eds.), New approaches to language mechanisms. Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forster, K. I. (1979). Levels of processing and the structure of the language processor. In W. E. Cooper & E. Walker (Eds.), Sentence processing. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foss, D. J. (1970). Some effects of ambiguity upon sentence completion. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 9, 699–706.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foss, D. J., & Jenkins, C. (1973). Some effects of context on the comprehension of ambiguous sentences. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 12, 577–589.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogaboam, T. W., & Perfetti, C. A. (1975). Lexical ambiguity and sentence comprehension. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 14, 265–274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holley-Wilcox, P., & Blank, M. (1980). Processing ambiguous words: Evidence for multiple access. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 8, 416–432.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmes, V. M., Arwas, R., & Garrett, M. F. (1977). Prior context and the perception of lexically ambiguous sentences. Memory & Cognition, 5, 103–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcel, A. (1980). Conscious and preconscious recognition of prolysemous words: Locating the selective effects of prior verbal context. In R. S. Nickerson (Ed.), Attention and Performance, VIII. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marslen-Wilson, W. D., & Tyler, L. K. (1980). The temporal structure of spoken language understanding. Cognition, 8, 1–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • McClelland, J. L., & O'Regan, J. K. (1981) On visual and contextual factors in reading: A reply to Rayner and Slowiaczek. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 7, 652–657.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mehler, J., Segui, J., & Carey, P. (1978). Tails of words: Monitoring ambiguity. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 17, 29–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oden, G. C., & Spira, J. L. (1983). Influence of context on the activation and selection of ambiguous word senses. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 35A, 51–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Onifer, W., & Swinney, D. A. (1981). Accessing lexical ambiguities during sentence comprehension: Effects of frequency of meaning and contextual bias. Memory & Cognition, 9, 225–236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, S. E. (1975). The effects of contextual scenes on the identification of objects. Memory & Cognition, 3, 519–526.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schvaneveldt, R., Meyer, D., & Becker, C. A. (1976). Lexical ambiguity, semantic context and visual word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 2, 243–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwanenflugel, P. J., & Shoben, E. J. (1985). The influence of sentence constraint on the scope of facilitation for upcoming words. Journal of Memory and Language, 24, 232–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seidenberg, M. S., Tanenhaus, M. K., Leiman, J. M., & Bienkowski, M. (1982). Automatic access of the meaning of ambiguous words in context: Some limitations of knowledge-based processing. Cognitive Psychology, 14, 489–537.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, G. B. (1981). Meaning dominance and semantic context in the processing of lexical ambiguity. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 20, 120–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swinney, D. A. (1979). Lexical access during sentence comprehension: (Re)consideration of context effects. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18, 645–660.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swinney, D. A., Onifer, W., Prather, P., & Hirshkowitz, M. (1979). Semantic facilitation across sensory modalities in the processing of individual words and sentences. Memory & Cognition, 7, 159–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tabossi, P. (1985). Effects of context on the immediate interpretation of unambiguous words. Manuscript submitted for publication.

  • Tanenhaus, M. K., Leiman, J. M., & Seidenberg, M. S. (1979). Evidence for multiple stages in the processing of ambiguous words in syntactic contexts. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18, 427–440.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winer, B. J. (1971). Statistical Principles in Experimental Design. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

The research reported here was supported by grants from the Ministero della Pubblica Istruzione (fondi 40%) and the Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tabossi, P., Colombo, L. & Job, R. Accessing lexical ambiguity: Effects of context and dominance. Psychol. Res 49, 161–167 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00308682

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00308682

Keywords

Navigation