Summary
The study deals with the processes of semantic activation which accompany the response of naming an object. A general model of semantic activation is presented, characterized by the proposal of the existence of different components of the semantic representations that constitute the conceptual nodes corresponding to objects. Within these, a distinction is made between elements corresponding to physical properties of the stimulus objects, and more abstract, functional elements. Two distinct “routes” are proposed for the activation of the concept node, a direct and an indirect one. A further distinction made in the present study is between categories characterized predominantly in terms of “perceptual” properties, and primarily “conceptual” categories.
The study reports two sets of experiments, the first one offering support to the distinction of two activation routes, the second to the notion of the existence of two types of categories. This latter distinction also allows a convincing explanation for various facts reported in the literature, in particular for the difference in categorization and in naming latencies for objects and for words.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bartram, D.J. (1974). The role of visual and semantic codes in object naming. Cognitive Psychology, 6, 325–356.
Cattell, J. McK. (1886). The time it takes to see and name objects. Mind, 11, 63–65.
Flores d'Arcais, G. B. (1986). Konzeptuelle Strukturen und das mentale Lexicon. In H. G. Bosshardt (Ed.), Perspektiven auf Sprache: Interdisziplinäre Beiträge zum Gedenken an Hans Hörmann. Berlin: De Gruyter.
Flores d'Arcais, G. B., Schreuder, R., & Glazenborg, G. (1985). Semantic activation during recognition of referential words. Psychological Research, 47, 39–49.
Fraisse, P. (1964). Le temps de réaction verbale: I Dénomination et lecture. Année Psychologique, 64, 21–46.
Glazenborg, G., Flores d'Arcais, G. B., & Schreuder, R. (in preparation). Semantic activation in the process of object recognition.
Hoffmann, J. (1982). Representation of concepts and the classification of objects. In F. Klix, J. Hoffmann, & E. van der Meer (Eds.), Cognitive research in psychology. Berlin: De Gruyter.
Kelter, S. (1982). Conceptual representation of objects in aphasia. Paper presented at the Fifth INS European Conference, Deauville, France.
Kelter, S., Grötzbach, H., Freiheit, R., Höhle, B., Wutzig, S., & Diesch, E. (1984). Object identification: The mental representation of physical and conceptual attributes. Memory & Cognition, 12, 123–133.
Lupker, S. J. (1979). The semantic nature of response compeition in the picture-word interference task. Memory & Cognition, 7, 485–495.
Oldfield, R. C. (1966). Things, words and the brain. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, 340–353.
Oldfield, R. C., & Wingfield, A. (1965). Response latency in naming objects. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 17, 273–281.
Palmer, S., Rosch, E., & Chase, P. (1981). Canonical perspective and the perception of objects. In J. B. Lang, & A. Baddeley (Eds.), Attention and Performance IX. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Schreuder, R. (submitted). The access of semantic information by pictures and words. Manuscript submitted for publication.
Schreuder, R., Flores d'Arcais, G. B., & Glazenborg, G. G. (1984). Effects of perceptual and conceptual similarity in semantic priming. Psychological Research, 45, 339–354.
Vanderwart, M. (1984). Priming by pictures in lexical decision. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 23, 67–83.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Flores d'Arcais, G.B., Schreuder, R. Semantic activation during object naming. Psychol. Res 49, 153–159 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00308681
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00308681