Skip to main content
Log in

Stage analysis of the reaction process using brain-evoked potentials and reaction time

  • Published:
Psychological Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Motor processes partly determine reaction time (RT) in both choice reaction time and in binary classification tasks. These latter tasks are popular in cognitive psychology because the experimenter believes that he has kept the motor component simple and constant and therefore can attribute changes in RT to perceptual or cognitive processes. In this paper we used the P3 component of the event-related potential (ERP) as a time marker indicating the duration of perceptual and cognitive processes. The latency of this component is believed to reflect stimulus evaluation time independent of response selection and organization time.

Two types of tasks were used: a choice-reaction time task and a binary classification task. Signal similarity and S-R compatibility additively affected RT, but only signal similarity affected P3 latency. The number of items in the positive set and response type affected both P3 latency and RT. Relative response frequency changed the bias in the cognitive evaluation of the stimulus, reflected in the latency of the P3 component, and affected RT only if the subjects preset their motor system (indexed by the late CNV). A model was presented which proposes that motor processes may partially overlap with the perceptual and cognitive evaluation of the stimulus. Both ERPs and RT are necessary tools in the study of the relative timing of these processes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Brookhuis, K.A., Mulder, G., Mulder, L.J.M., Gloerich, A.B.M., Dellen, H.J. van, Meere, J.J. van der, & Ellerman, H.H. (1981). Late positive components and stimulus evaluation time. Biological Psychology 13, 107–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapman, R.M., McCrary, J.W., Chapman, J.A. (1981). Memory processes and evoked potentials. Canadian Journal of Psychology 35, 201–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chase, W.G. (1978). Elementary information processes: In: W.K. Estes (ed.), Handbook of Learning and Cognitive Process. Lawrence Erlbaum.

  • Donchin, E., Ritter, W., McCallum, W.C. (1978). Cognitive psychophysiology: The endogenous components of the ERP. In: E. Callaway, P. Tueting and S.H. Koslow (eds.), Event Related Brain Potentials in Man. New York, Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, J. (1978). Response selection in spatial choice reaction: Further evidence against associative models. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 30, 429–440.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan-Johnson, C.C. The P300 latency: A new metric of information processing. Psychophysiology 18, 207–215.

  • Duncan-Johnson, C.C. & Donchin, E. (1982). The P300 component of the event-related brain potential as an index of information processing. Biological Psychology 14, 1–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ford, J.M., Mohs, R.C., Pfefferbaum, A. & Kopell, B.S. (1980). On the utility of P3 latency and RT for studying cognitive processes. In: Kornhuber, H.H. & Deecke, L. (eds.) Motivation, Motor and Sensory Processes of the Brain: Electrical Potentials, Behavior and Clinical Use. Amsterdam, North Holland Publ. Comp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, D., Vaughan, H.G. Jr. and Erlenmeyer-Kimling, L. (1981). Multiple late positive potentials in two visual discrimination tasks. Psychophysiology 18, 635–649.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frowein, H.W. (1981). Selective drug effects on information processing. Thesis, University of Tilburg, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaillard, A.W.K. (1978). Slow brain potentials preceding task performance. Thesis, Amsterdam, Academic Press B.V.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillyard, S.A. & Kutas, M. (1983). Electrophysiology of cognitive processing. Annual Review of Psychology 34, 33–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, J.E., Simons, R.F., Houck, M.R. (in press). Event-related potentials during controlled and automatic target detection. Psychophysiology.

  • Kutas, M., McCarthy, G. & Donchin, E. (1977). Augmenting mental chronometry: The P300 as a measure of stimulus evaluation time. Science 197, 792–795.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, G. & Donchin, E. (1983). Chronometric analysis of human information processing. In: A.W.K. Gaillard & W. Ritter (eds.), Tutorials in Event-Related Potential Research: Endogenous Components. Amsterdam, North Holland Publ. Comp.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, G. & Donchin, E. (1981). A metric for thought: A comparison of P300 latency and reaction time. Science 211, 77–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • McClelland, J. (1979). On the time relations of mental processes. A framework for analyzing processes in cascade. Psychological Review 86, 287–330.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, J. (1982). Discrete versus continuous stage models of human information processing: In search of partial output. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 8, 273–296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulder, L.J.M., Brookhuis, K.A., Arkel, A. van & Mulder, G. (1980). Detection of variable latency components in EEG-evoked potentials. In: Proceedings of the Digital Equipment Computer Users Society vol. 7, no. 1. Amsterdam.

  • Mulder, G., Brookhuis, K.A., Dellen, H.A. van, Goerich, A.B.M. & Mulder, L.J.M. (in press). Memory search and practice effects. In: C. McCallum (ed.), Proceedings of EPIC VII.

  • Murdock, B.B. (1982). Recognition memory. In: C.R. Puff (ed.), Handbook of Research Methods in Memory and Cognition. New York, Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nickerson, R.S. (1973). The use of binary classification tasks in the study of human information processing: A tutorial review, in S. Kornblum (ed.), Attention and Performance IV. New York, Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pachella, R.G. & Fisher, D.F. (1969). Effect of stimulus degradation and stimulus similarity on the trade-off between speed and accuracy in absolute judgments. Journal of Experimental Psychology 81, 7–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pritchard, W.S. (1981). Psychophysiology of P300. Psychological Bulletin 89, 506–540.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ragot, R. & Renault, B. (1981). P300 as a function of S-R compatibility and motor programming. Biological Psychology 13, 289–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritter, W., Vaughan, H.G. Jr. and Simson, R. (1983). On relating event-related potentials components to stages of information processing. In: A.W.H. Gaillard & W. Ritter (eds.), Tutorial in Event-Related Potential Research: Endogenous Components. Amsterdam, North Holland Publ. Comp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanders A.F. (1980). Stage analysis of reaction processes. In: Stelmach, G.E. & Requin, J. (eds.), Tutorials in Motor Behavior. Amsterdam, North Holland Publ. Comp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, W. & Shiffrin, R.M. (1977). Controlled and automatic information processing. Detection, search and attention. Psychological Review 84, 1–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shiffrin, R.M. & Schneider, W. (1977). Controlled and automatic human information processing II: Perceptual learning, automatic attending and a general theory. Psychological Review 84, 127–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shwartz, S.P., Pomerantz, J.R. & Egeth, H.H. (1977). State and process limitations in information processing: An additive factor analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 3, 402–410.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, S. (1966). High speed scanning in human memory. Science 153, 652–654.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, S. (1969). The discovery of processing stages: Extensions of Donders' method. In: Koster, W.G. (ed.), Attention and Performance II (=Acta Psychologica, 30, 276–315).

  • Squires, N.K., Halgrem, E, Wilson, Ch. and Crandall, P. (1983). Human endogenous limbic potentials. In: A.W.K. Gaillard and W. Ritter (eds.), Tutorials in Event-Related Potential Research: Endogenous Components. Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, D.A. (1976). Stage analysis of reaction processes. Psychological Bulletin 83, 161–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Theios, J., Smith, P.G., Haviland, S.E., Traupmann, J. and Moy, M.C. (1973). Memory scanning as a serial, self-terminating process. Journal of Experimental Psychology 97, 323–336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Theios, J. and Walter, D.G. (1979). Stimulus and response frequency and sequential effects in memory scanning reaction times. Journal of Experimental Psychology 102, 1092–1099.

    Google Scholar 

  • Theios, J. (1975). The components of response latency in simple human information processing tasks. In: P.M.A. Rabbitt and S. Dornic (eds.), Attention and Performance V. London, Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mulder, G., Gloerich, A.B.M., Brookhuis, K.A. et al. Stage analysis of the reaction process using brain-evoked potentials and reaction time. Psychol. Res 46, 15–32 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00308590

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00308590

Keywords

Navigation