Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

In-vitro translation of cucumoviral satellites III. Translational efficiencies of cucumber mosaic virus-associated RNA 5 sequence variants can be related to the predicted secondary structures of their first 55 nucleotides

  • Published:
Virus Genes Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The cucumber mosaic virus (CMV) satellites D- and S-CARNA 5 (CARNA 5= Cucumber mosaic virus-Associated RNA 5), their full-length cDNA clone transcripts, and DNA clone transcripts of their open reading frames (ORFs) were used as mRNAs in the wheat-germ in-vitro translation system. Natural D-CARNA 5 yielded an anomalously large polypeptide, while transcripts made from cDNA clones of D-CARNA 5 or its first ORF had no mRNA activity. Transcripts made from the second major ORF in D-CARNA 5 yielded a smaller product, consistent with its size. Natural S-CARNA 5 and its cDNA clone transcripts both yielded the two polypeptides previously reported, while transcripts of its only major ORF yielded exclusively the smaller of the two products. The potential for an alternate initiation codon, 36 nucleotides upstream, being the source of the larger of the two polypeptides was tested. The differences in the translational properties of D- and S-CARNA 5 were related to the predicted secondary structures of the first 55 nucleotides in these CARNA 5 sequence variants. The calculated free energies of the predicted hairpins correlated inversely with their in-vitro translational activities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kaper, J.M. Tousignant, M.E. and Steen, M.T. Virology 163, 284–292, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kaper, J.M. and Collmer, C.W. in Domingo, E., Holland, J. and Ahlquist, P., (eds.) RNA Genetics, Vol. III: Variability of RNA Genomnes. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 1988, p. 171–194.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Simon, A.E. Plant Mol Biol Rep 6, 240–252, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Richards, K.E., Jonard, G., Jacquemond, M. and Lot, H. Virology 89, 395–408, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Avila-Rincon, M.J., Collmer, C.W. and Kaper, J.M. Virology 152, 446–454, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Garcia-Arenal, F., Zaitlin, M. and Palukaitis, P. Virology 158, 339–347, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hidaka, S., Hanada, K., Ishikawa, K. and Miura, K. Virology 164, 326–333, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Owens, R.A. and Kaper, J.M. Virology 80, 196–803, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Avila-Rincon, M.J., Collmer, C.W. and Kaper, J.M. Virology 152, 455–458, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lot, H., Marrou, J., Quiot, J.B. and Esvan, C. Ann Phytopath 4, 25–38, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kaper, J.M. and West, C.K. Prep Biochem 2, 251–263, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kaper, J.M., Tousignant, M.E. and Lot, H. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 72, 1237–1243, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Viera, J. and Messing, J. Gene 19, 259–268, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Maniatis, T., Fritsch, E.F. and Sambrook, J. Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Sanger, F., Nicklin, S. and Coulson, A.R. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 74, 5463–5467, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Swank, R.T. and Munkres, K.E. Anal Biochem 39, 462–477, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Anderson, C.W. and Buzash-Pollert, E. Mol Cell Biol 5, 3621–3624, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Gordon, K.H.J. and Symons, R.H. Nucleic Acids Res 11, 947–959, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Freier, S.M., Kierzek, R., Jaeger, J.A., Sugimoto, N., Caruthers, M.H., Neilson, T. and Turner, D.H. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 83, 9373–9377, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Kubo, M. and Imanaka, T.J. Bacteriol 171, 4080–4082, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Klionsky, D.J., Skalnik, D.G. and Simoni, R.D. J Biol Chem 261, 8096–8099, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Pelletier, J. and Sonenberg, N. Biochem Cell Biol 65, 576–581, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Parkin, N.T., Cohen, E.A., Darveau, A., Rosen, C., Haseltine, W. and Sonenberg, N. EMBO J 7, 2831–2837, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Gold, L. Ann Rev Microbiol 57, 199–233, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Yamaguchi, K., Hidaka, S. and Miura, K. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 79, 1012–1016, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Kozak, M. Microbiol Rev 47, 1–45, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Steen, M.T., Kaper, J.M., Pleij, C.W.A. et al. In-vitro translation of cucumoviral satellites III. Translational efficiencies of cucumber mosaic virus-associated RNA 5 sequence variants can be related to the predicted secondary structures of their first 55 nucleotides. Virus Genes 4, 41–52 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00308564

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00308564

Key words

Navigation