Skip to main content
Log in

Zipf's Law in transcribed speech

  • Published:
Psychological Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Based on large samples of written text. ‘Zipf:s Law’ holds that the logarithms of frequencies of words, and the number of different words at those frequencies, have an inverse linear relationship. This study tested this law on an oral sample by analysis of a transcribed interview which had been conducted for an unrelated study. A second purpose was to test whether the law holds differently for open- vs closed-class words. The words in the interview were tabulated by frequencies and numbers of words at each frequency, and separated by syntactic class. As Zipf found for written samples, the law provides a reasonable summary of the data for the less frequently used words but predicts fewer different words among the most frequently used words than were actually found. Linear regressions performed for each syntactic class revealed that the regression equation for open-class words provided the best fit to Zipf's law. The sample of closed-class words, containing a much smaller proportion of low frequency words, revealed a poor fit to Zipf's law.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Cherry C (1966) On human communication. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mandelbrot B (1952) An informational theory of the structure of language based upon the theory of the statistical matching of messages and coding. Proceedings of the London Symposium

  • Miller GA (1965) Introduction to First MIT Press Paperback Edition of Zipf (1935)

  • Zipf GK (1935) The psychobiology of language. Houghton Mifflin, New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

The author wishes to thank Diane Beyerchen, Wendy Calla, Edward Kulick, and Clinton B' Walker for their cooperation and suggestions.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ridley, D.R. Zipf's Law in transcribed speech. Psychol. Res 44, 97–103 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00308559

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00308559

Keywords

Navigation