Abstract
The distribution of Fe3+ and Ga3+ between the two tetrahedral sites in three synthetic melilites has been studied by using 57Fe Mössbauer spectroscopy. In the melilite, (Ca2Ga2SiO7)50 (Ca2Fe3+GaSiO7)50 (mol %), the distribution of Fe3+ and Ga3+ in T1 and T2 sites is apparently random, which can be explained in terms of the electrostatic valence rule. However in the melilites, (Ca2MgSi2O7)52 (Ca2Fe3+GaSiO7)42 (Ca2Ga2SiO7)6 and (Ca2MgSi2O7)62 (Ca2Fe3+GaSiO7)36 (Ca2Ga2SiO7)2 (mol %), Fe3+ shows preference for the more ionic T1 site and Ga3+ for the more covalent T2 site. If the electronegativity of Ga3+ is assumed to be larger than that of Fe3+, the mode of distribution of Fe3+ and Ga3+ can be explained in terms of our previous hypothesis that a large electronegativity induces a stronger preference for the more covalent T2 site.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Akasaka M, Ohashi H (1985) 57Fe Mössbauer study of synthetic Fe3+-melilites. Phys Chem Minerals 12:13–18
Amthauer G, Günzler V, Hafner SS, Reinen D (1982) The distribution of Fe3+ and Ga3+ between octahedral and tetrahedral sites in garnets, Y3(Fe, Ga)5O12, at different temperatures. Z Kristallogr 161:167–186
Dowty E (1971) Crystal chemistry of titanium and zirconium garnet: I. Review and spectral studies. Am Mineral 56:1983–2009
Fischer P, Hälg W, Stoll E, Segmüller A (1966) X-ray and neutron diffraction study of the substitutional disorder in the yttrium iron gallium garnets. Acta Crystallogr 21:765–769
Geller S, Cape JA, Espinosa GP, Leslie DH (1966) Gallium-substituted yttrium iron garnet. Phys Rev 148:522–524
Haissinsky M (1946) Echelle des electronegativites de Pauling et chaleurs de formation des composes inorganiques. J Phys Radium 7:7–11
Huggins FE, Virgo D, Huckenholz HG (1977) Titanium-containing silicate garnets. I. The distribution of Al, Fe3+ and Ti4+ between octahedral and tetrahedral sites. Am Mineral 62:475–490
Kimata M (1983) The crystal structure and stability of Co-åkermanite, Ca2CoSi2O7, compared with the mineralogical behaviour of Mg cation. Neues Jahrb Mineral Abh 146:221–241
Kimata M (1984) The structure properties of synthetic Sr-gehlenite, Sr2Al2SiO7. Z Kristallogr 167:103–116
Kimata M, Ii N (1981) The crystal structure of synthetic åkermanite, Ca2MgSi2O7. Neues Jahrb Mineral Monatsh 15:1–10
Kimata M, Ii N (1982) The structure property of synthetic gehlenite, Ca2Al2SiO7. Neues Jahrb Mineral Abh 144:254–267
Lüthi B, Henningsen T (1965) Magnetic properties of the gallium iron garnet system. Proc Int Conf Magnetism Nottingham 1964 Inst Physics and the Physical Society London:668–671
Marezio M, Remeika JP, Dernier PD (1968) Cation distribution in Y3Al5−cGacO12 garnet. Acta Crystallogr Sect B 24:1670–1674
Ohashi H, Fujita T, Osawa T (1983) The crystal structure of NaGaSi2O6 pyroxene. J Jpn Assoc Mineral Petrol Econ Geol 78:159–163
Pauling L (1960) The nature of the chemical bond (3rd ed). Cornell Univ Press Ithaca NY
Robinson K, Gibbs GV, Ribbe PH (1971) Quadratic elongation: A quantitative measure of distortion in coordination polyhedra. Science 172:567–570
Röschmann P (1980) Site preference of iron, gallium and alluminium in quasibinary mixed garnets. J Phys Chem Solids 41:569–581
Shinno I, Maeda Y (1981) A fortran IV computer program LSF for analysis of Mössbauer spectra. The Reports on Earth Science College of General Education Kyushu Univ 22:13–26
Steffen G, Seifert F, Amthauer G (1984) Ferric iron in sapphirine: a Mössbauer spectroscopic study. Am Mineral 69:339–348
Streever RL, Uriano GA (1965) Nuclear resonance study of gallium substituted yttrium iron garnet. Phys Rev 139:A305-A313
Sweatman TR, Long JVP (1969) Quantitative electron-probe microanalysis of rock-forming minerals. J Petrol 10:332–379
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Akasaka, M., Ohashi, H. & Shinno, I. The distribution of Fe3+ and Ga3+ between two tetrahedral sites in melilites, Ca2(Mg, Fe3+, Ga, Si)3O7 . Phys Chem Minerals 13, 152–155 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00308156
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00308156