Biology and Fertility of Soils

, Volume 20, Issue 1, pp 1–7 | Cite as

Testate amoebae as predators of nematodes

  • Gregor W. Yeates
  • Wilhelm Foissner
Original Paper

Abstract

Testacea were observed ingesting nematodes in the litter horizons of native forests in New Zealand. Nematodes were most commonly attacked from the tail end but some specimens were attacked at mid-body. Nematodes with damaged tails were recovered in greatest numbers from the highest, wettest site sampled. Nebela (Apodera) vas (Certes, 1989) and Difflugia sp. (possibly lanceolata Penard, 1890) were the predators; both species were redescribed using light and scanning electron microscopy and morphometry. Most damaged nematodes were Ironus sp. but Clarkus, Tobrilus, Iotonchus, Cobbonchus, Dorylaimus and Plectus were also attacked. Literature on testacean feeding strategies was reviewed briefly.

Key words

Testate amoebae Nematodes Predation Soil Litter Nebela (Apodera) vas Difflugia lanceolata 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anderson OR (1989) Some observations of feeding behavior, growth, and test particle morphology of a silica-secreting testate amoeba Netzelia tuberculata (Wallich) (Rhizopoda, Testacea) grown in laboratory culture. Arch Protistenkd 137:211–221Google Scholar
  2. Certes A (1889) Protozoaires. Mission Sci du Cap Horn 1882–1883 6:1–53Google Scholar
  3. Chardez D (1985) Protozoaires predateurs de thécamoebiens. Protistologica 21:187–194Google Scholar
  4. Coleman DC, Anderson RV, Cole CV, McClellan JF, Woods LE, Trofymow JA, Elliott ET (1984) Roles of protozoa and nematodes in nutrient cycling. In: Giddens JE, Todd RL (eds) Microbial-plant interactions. Am Soc Agron Spec Publ 47, Madison, Wis, pp 17–28Google Scholar
  5. Deflandre G (1936) Étude monographique sur le genre Nebela Leidy (Rhizopoda-Testacea). Ann Protist 5:201–286Google Scholar
  6. Foissner W (1987) Soil protozoa: fundamental problems ecological significance, adaptations in ciliates and testaceans, bioindicators, and guide to the literature. Progr Protistol 2:69–212Google Scholar
  7. Golemansky V (1966) Contribution à la connaissance des thécamoebiens (Rhizopoda, Testacea) en Yougoslavie. Bull Mus Hist Nat Belgrade B 21:193–205Google Scholar
  8. Grospietsch T (1965) Wechseltierchen (Rhizopoden), 2nd edn. Kosmos, StuttgartGoogle Scholar
  9. Grospietsch T (1971) Beitrag zur Ökologie der Testaceen Rhizopoden von Marion Island. In: Bakker EMZ, Winterbottom JM, Dyer RA (eds) Marion and Prince Edwards Islands. Balkema, Cape Town, pp 411–423Google Scholar
  10. Hoogenraad HR, Groot AA de (1941) Observations on a special manner of feeding of a species of Difflugia (Difflugia rubescens Penard). Proc Ned Akad Wet 44:3–14Google Scholar
  11. Hoogenraad HR, Grott AA de (1948) Thecamoebous moss-rhizopods from New Zealand. Hydrobiologia 1:28–44Google Scholar
  12. Hoogenraad HR, Groot AA de (1979) Die geographische Verbreitung der Süsswasser-Rhizopoden. Hydrobiol Bull (Amsterdam). 13:152–171Google Scholar
  13. Jung W (1942) Südchilenische Thekamöben. (Aus dem südchilenischen Küstengebiet, Beitrag 10). Arch Protistenkd 95:253–356Google Scholar
  14. Laminger H, Bucher M (1984) Freßverhalten einiger terrestrischer Testaceen (Protozoa, Rhizopoda). Pedobiologia 27:313–322Google Scholar
  15. Loeblich AR Jr, Tappan H (1961) Remarks on the systematics of the Sarkodina (Protozoa), renamed homonyms and new and validated genera. Proc Biol Soc Wash 74:213–234Google Scholar
  16. Moeed A, Meads M (1985) Seasonality of pitfall trapped invertebrates in three types of native forest, Orongorongo Valley, New Zealand. NZ J Zool 12:17–53Google Scholar
  17. Ogden CG (1983) Observations of the systematics of the genus Difflugia in Britain (Rhizopoda, Protozoa). Bull Br Mus Nat Hist (Zool) 44:1–73Google Scholar
  18. Ogden CG, Ellison RL (1988) The value of the organic cement matrix in the identification of the shells of fossil testate amoebae. J Micropalaeontol 7:233–240Google Scholar
  19. Oye P van (1956) On the thecamoeban fauna of New Zealand with description of four new species and biogeografical discussion. Hydrobiologia 8:16–37Google Scholar
  20. Patterson RT, MacKinnon KD, Scott DB, Medioli FS (1985) Arcellaceans (“Thecamoebians”) in small lakes of New Brunswick and Nova Scotia: modern distribution and Holocene stratigraphic changes. J Foraminiferal Res 15:114–137Google Scholar
  21. Peck RK (1985) Feeding behaviour in the ciliate Pseudomicrothorax dubius is a series of morphologically and physiologically distinct events. J Protozool 32:492–501Google Scholar
  22. Penard E (1890) Etudes sur les rhizopodes d'eau douce. Mém Soc Phys Hist Nat Genève 31:1–230Google Scholar
  23. Penard E (1911) Sarcodina. Rhizopodes d'eau douce. Br Antarct Exped 1907–1909 1:203–261Google Scholar
  24. Schönborn W (1966) Beschalte Amöben (Testacea). Ziemsen, Wittenberg LutherstadtGoogle Scholar
  25. Schönborn W (1992) The role of protozoan communities in freshwater and soil ecosystems. Acta Protozool 31:11–18Google Scholar
  26. Schönborn W, Foissner W, Meisterfeld R (1983) Licht-und rasterelektronenmikroskopische Untersuchungen zur Schalenmorphologie und Rassenbildung bodenbewohnender Testaceen (Protozoa: Rhizopoda) sowie Vorschläge zur biometrischen Charakterisierung von Testaceen-Schalen. Protistologica 19:553–566Google Scholar
  27. Schönborn W, Petz W, Wanner M, Foissner W (1987) Observations on the morphology and ecology of the soil-inhabiting testate amoeba Schoenbornia humicola (Schönborn, 1964) Decloitre, 1964 (Protozoa, Rhizopoda). Arch Protistenkd 134:315–330Google Scholar
  28. Small RW (1988) Invertebrate predators. In: Poinar GO, Jansson HB (eds) Diseases of nematodes, vol II. Chemical Rubber Company, Boca Raton, Fla, pp 73–92Google Scholar
  29. Southey JF (ed) (1986) Laboratory methods for work with plant and soil nematodes. HMSO, LondonGoogle Scholar
  30. Štěpánek M (1952) Testacea of the pond of Hrádek at Kunratice (Prague). Sb Nár Muz Praze 8:1–55Google Scholar
  31. Stout JD (1971) Aspects of the microbiology and oxidation of Wicken Fen soil. Soil Biol Biochem 3:9–25Google Scholar
  32. Varga L (1959) Untersuchungen über die Mikrofauna der Waldstreu einiger Waldtypen im Bükkgebirge (Ungarn). Acta Zool Hung 4:443–478Google Scholar
  33. Varga L (1960) Über die moosbewohnende Mikrofauna aus einer Dachrinne von Tihany. Ann Biol Tihany 27:169–182 (in Hungarian with German summary)Google Scholar
  34. Yeates GW (1970) Four Dorylaimina (Nematoda) from Wicken Fen, Cambridgeshire. Nematologica 16:273–283Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gregor W. Yeates
    • 1
  • Wilhelm Foissner
    • 2
  1. 1.Landcare ResearchPalmerston NorthNew Zealand
  2. 2.Institut für ZoologieUniversität SalzburgSalzburgAustria

Personalised recommendations