Skip to main content
Log in

Local control after surgical treatment of spinal metastatic disease

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Surgery was carried out on 118 patients with spinal metastatic diseases; 80 operations were palliative and 38 were curative. All patients who survived 1 year or more and all those who had local recurrence before dying (total n=58) were included in this study. The aim of the study was to identify the factors that determine the success of local control in order to develop a new technique that could prevent local recurrence. From among the different factors that may influence the oncological result, a retrospective study concentrated particularly on the following items: sex of the patient, location and extension of the tumor on the spine, tumor involvement on the vertebra itself, and quality of tumor excision. These factors seem to have no or little influence on local control. However, sensitivity of the primary cancer to adjuvant treatments (e.g., chemotherapy, radiation therapy, hormonotherapy) and correct timing of the radiation therapy, which must be performed after, rather than before, surgery, seem to improve local control significantly. The authors therefore suggest two options for treatment. When the primary cancer is sensitive to adjuvant treatments, ‘palliative’ surgery with posterior fixation and nerve decompression seems sufficient to attain good function and adequate oncological results. On the other hand, when the primary cancer is resistant to adjuvant treatment or when the lesion recurs after radiation therapy, more aggressive surgery must be carried out. Complete excision of the tumor after embolization, with may be even associated local chemotherapy, is required. However, even when this is carried out, local control is difficult to achieve.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Constans JP, Divitiis E, Donzelli R (1983) Spinal metastases with neurological manifestations. Review of 600 cases. J Neurosurg 59: 111–118

    Google Scholar 

  2. Goutallier D, Lewertowski JM (1992) Traitement des métastases vertébrales dorsales et lombaires avec atteinte corporéale prédominante par corporectomie et montage antérieur associant ciment et plaque vissée. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 78: 319–332

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hernigou Ph, Thiery JP, Benoit J (1989) Methotrexate diffusion from acrylic cement. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 71: 804–811

    Google Scholar 

  4. Jonsson B, Jonsson H, Karlstrom G, Sjostrom L (1994) Surgery of cervical metastasis: a retrospective study. Eur Spine J 3: 76–83

    Google Scholar 

  5. Harrington KD (1988) Anterior cord decompression and stabilisation of the spine as a treatment for vertebral collapse and spinal compression from metastatic malignacy. Clin Orthop 233: 177–197

    Google Scholar 

  6. King GJ, Kostwik JP, Broom RJ, Richardson W (1991) Surgical management of metastatic renal carcinoma of the spine. Spine 16: 256–257

    Google Scholar 

  7. Roy-Camille R, Saillant G, Lapresle Ph, Mazel C, Mariambourg G (1985) Traitement chirurgical des métastases du rachis par stabilisation à l'aide de plaques postérieures vissées dans les pédicules vertébraux. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 71: 483–492

    Google Scholar 

  8. Sucher E, Margulies JY, Floman Y, Robin GC (1994) Prognostic factors in anterior decompression for metastatic cord decompression. Eur Spine J 3: 70–75

    Google Scholar 

  9. Sundaresan N, Galicih JH, Lane JM, Bains MS, McCormack P (1985) Treatment of neoplastic epidural cord compression by vertebral body resection and stabilization. J Neuro Surg 63: 676–684

    Google Scholar 

  10. Tomita K, Toribatake Y, Kawanara N, Ohnari H, Kobe H (1994) Total en bloc spondylectomy and circum spinal decompression for solitary spinal metastasis. Paraplegia 32: 36–45

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Missenard, G., Lapresle, P. & Cote, D. Local control after surgical treatment of spinal metastatic disease. Eur Spine J 5, 45–50 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00307826

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00307826

Key words

Navigation