Skip to main content
Log in

Molecular characterization of Mutator systems in maize embryogenic callus cultures indicates Mu element activity in vitro

  • Published:
Theoretical and Applied Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Active Mutator lines of maize (Zea mays L.) are characterized by their ability to generate new mutants at a high rate and by somatic instability at Mutator-induced mutant alleles. Mutagenically active lines with fewer than ten Mu elements per diploid genome have not been observed. Alteration of Mutator activity has been shown to correlate with the state of modification of Hinfl restiction sites that lie within inverted terminal repeats of Mu elements. To determine whether active Mutator systems can be established and maintained in culture, copy number and modification state of Mu elements were investigated in embryogenic callus lines derived from F1S of crosses of active Mutator stock with the inbred lines A188 and H99. All callus lines studied maintain high Mu-element copy numbers, and more than half show a continued lack of modification at the Mu element Hinfl sites; thus, parameters associated with mutagenic activity in planta are present in some, but not all, callus lines. Mutator activity was then tested directly by restriction fragment analysis of subclonal populations from A188/Mu 2 and H99/Mu 2 embryonic cultures. Novel Mu-homologous restriction fragments occurred in 38% of the subpopulations which contained unmodified Mu elements, but not in control cultures containing modified, genetically inactive Mu elements. We conclude that Mu elements from active Mutator parents can remain transpositionally active in embryogenic cell culture. Active Mutator cell lines may be useful for the production of mutations in vitro.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alleman M, Freeling M (1986) The Mu transposable elements of maize: Evidence for transposition and copy number regulation during development. Genetics 112:107–119

    Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong CL, Green CE (1985) Establishment and maintenance of friable, embryogenic maize callus and the involvement of L-proline. Planta 164:207–214

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker B, Schell J, Lorz H, Fedoroff N (1986) Transposition of the maize controlling element “Activator” in tobacco. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 83:4844–4848

    Google Scholar 

  • Barker RF, Thompson DV, Talbot DR, Swanson JA, Bennetzen JL (1984) Nucleotide sequence of the maize transposable element Mu1. Nucleic Acids Res 12:5955–5966

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennetzen JL (1984) Transposable element Mu1 is found in multiple copies only in Robertson's Mutator maize lines. J Mol Appl Genet 2:519–524

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennetzen JL (1987) Covalent DNA modification and the regulation of Mutator element transposition in maize. Mol Gen Genet 208:45–51

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennetzen JL, Swanson JA, Taylor WC, Freeling M (1984) DNA insertion in the first intron of maize Adh1 affects message levels: Cloning of progenitor and mutant Adh1 alleles. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 18:4125–4128

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennetzen JL, Cresse A, Brown WE, Lee L (1987) Molecular cloning of maize genes by transposon tagging with Mutator. UCLA Symp Mol Cell Biol (in press)

  • Bird AP (1986) CpG-rich islands and the function of DNA methylation. Nature 321:209–213

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown PTH, Lorz H (1986) Molecular changes and possible origins of somaclonal variation. In: Semal J (ed) Somaclonal variations and crop improvement. Martinus Nijhoff, Boston, pp 148–159

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavalli-Sforza L, Bodmer W (1971) Genetics of human populations. Freeman, San Francisco, pp 416–418

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandler VL, Walbot V (1986) DNA modification of a maize transposable element correlates with loss of activity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 83:1767–1771

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen C-H, Oishi KK, Kloeckener-Gruissem B, Freeling M (1987) Organ-specific expression of maize Adhl1 is altered after a Mu transposon insertion. Genetics 116:469–477

    Google Scholar 

  • Chu CC, Wang CC, Sun CS, Hsu C, Yin KC, Chu CY, Bi FY (1975) Establishment of an efficient medium for anther culture of rice through comparative experiments on the nitrogen sources. Sci Sin 18:659–668

    Google Scholar 

  • Culley DE (1986) Evidence for the activation of a cryptic transposable element Ac in maize endosperm cultures. In: VI Intl Congr Plant Tissue Cell Culture Abstr. University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, p 220

    Google Scholar 

  • Feinberg AP, Vogelstein B (1983) A technique for radiolabeling DNA restriction endonuclease fragments to high specific activity. Anal Biochem 132:6–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Green CE, Phillips RL (1975) Plant regeneration from tissue cultures of maize. Crop Sci 15:117–121

    Google Scholar 

  • Grierson D (1977) The nucleus and the organization and transcription of nuclear DNA. In. Smith H (ed) The molecular biology of plant cells, vol 14. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 213–255

    Google Scholar 

  • Groose RW, Bingham ET (1986) An unstable anthocyanin mutation recovered from tissue culture of alfalfa (Medicago sativa). Plant Cell Rep 5:104–110

    Google Scholar 

  • Gruenbaum Y, Cedar H, Razin A (1981) Restriction enzyme digestion of hemimethylated DNA. Nucleic Acids Res 9:2509–2515

    Google Scholar 

  • Hake S, Walbot V (1980) The genome of Zea mays. It's organization and homology to related grasses. Chromosoma 79:251–270

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodges TK, Kamo KK, Imbrie C, Becwar MR (1986) Genotype specificity of somatic embryogenesis and regeneration in maize. Biotechnol 4:219–223

    Google Scholar 

  • Holliday R, Huschtscha LI, Tarrant GM, Kirkwood TBL (1977) Testing the commitment theory of cellular aging. Science 198:366–372

    Google Scholar 

  • Larkin PJ, Scowcroft WR (1981) Somaclonal variation - a novel source of genetic variability from cell cultures for plant improvement. Theor Appl Genet 60:197–214

    Google Scholar 

  • Larkin PJ, Brettel RIS, Ryan SA, Davies PA, Pallotta MA, Scowcroft WR (1985) Somaclonal variation: Impact on plant biology and breeding strategies. In: Zaitlin M, Day P, Hollaender A (eds) Biotechnology in plant science. Academic Press, New York, pp 83–100

    Google Scholar 

  • McClelland M, Nelson M (1985) The effect of site specific methylation on restriction endonuclease digestion. Nucleic Acids Res Suppl 13:201–207

    Google Scholar 

  • Peschke VM, Phillips RL (1987) Discovery of Ac activity among progeny of tissue culture-derived maize plants. Science 238:804–807

    Google Scholar 

  • Reddy AR, Peterson PA (1977) Callus initiation from waxy endosperm of various genotypes of maize. Maydica 22:125–130

    Google Scholar 

  • Rivin CJ, Zimmer EA, Walbot V (1982) Isolation of DNA and RNA recombinants from maize. In: Sheridan WF (ed) Maize for biological research. Plant Molecular Biology Assoc, Charlottesville/VA, pp 161–164

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson DS (1978) Characterization of a mutator system in maize. Mutat Res 51:21–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson DS (1980) The timing of mu activity in maize. Genetics 94:969–978

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson DS (1981a) Mutator activity in maize. Timing of its activation in ontogeny. Science 213:1515–1517

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson DS (1981b) Tests of two models for the transmission of the Mu mutator in maize. Mol Gen Genet 183:51–53

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson DS (1983) A possible dose-dependent inactivation of Mutator (Mu) in maize. Mol Gen Genet 191:86–90

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson DS (1984) Putative forward mutation frequencies at the y1 and wx loci in the presence of Mu. Maize Genet Coop Newsl 58:11–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson DS (1985) Evidence for Mutator activity in the male gametophyte. Maize Genet Coop Newsl 59:14–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson DS (1986) New information on the timing of Mu's mutator activity. Maize Genet Coop Newsl 60:12–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson DS (1987) Mendelian ratios in crosses of mutable Mutator-indmced a1 mutants. Maize Genet Coop Newsl 61:11–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson DS (1988) Additional evidence that Mu Mutator activity can occur during the development of the embryo. Maize Genet Coop Newsl 62:21

    Google Scholar 

  • Southern EM (1975) Detection of specific sequences among DNA fragments separated by gel electrophoresis. J Mol Biol 98:503–518

    Google Scholar 

  • Talbert LE, Kelly AJ, Chandler VL (1988) Characterization of a class of Mu elements present in normal lines. Maize Genet Coop Newsl 62:59

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor LP, Walbot V (1987) Isolation and characterization of a 1.7 kb transposable element from a Mutator line of maize. Genetics 117:297–307

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor LP, Chandler VL, Walbot V (1986) Insertion of 1.4 kb and 1.7 kb Mu elements into the bronze1 gene of Zea mays L. Maydica 31:31–45

    Google Scholar 

  • Walbot V, Warren C (1988) Regulation of Mu element copy number in maize lines with an active or inactive Mutator transposable element system. Mol Gen Genet 211:27–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Walbot V, Chandler VL, Taylor LP (1985) Alterations in the mutator transposable element family of Zea mays. In: Freeling M (ed) Plant genetics, UCLA Symposium on Molecular and Cellular Biology, vol 35. Alan Liss, New York, pp 333–342

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Communicated by F. Salamini

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

James, M.G., Stadler, J. Molecular characterization of Mutator systems in maize embryogenic callus cultures indicates Mu element activity in vitro. Theoret. Appl. Genetics 77, 383–393 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00305833

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00305833

Key words

Navigation