Skip to main content
Log in

Analytical problems in the measurement of the quality of life

  • Published:
Social Indicators Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The absence of an explicit theoretical framework seems to have led to a number of objectionable features — empirical as well as conceptual — in previous attempts to construct and apply QOL measures. This paper presents a theoretical framework for QOL measurement based on individual utility maximization. Without severe restrictions on the form of the utility function, however, this framework does not lead to meaningful average or aggregate QOL measures. Furthermore, our empirical analysis indicates that attempts to use currently available QOL measures — despite their conceptual inadequacy — in the analysis of migration have been ill conceived.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Bibliography

  • CebulaR. J. and R. K.Vedder: 1973, ‘A note on migration, economic opportunity, and the quality of life’, J. Regional Sci. 13, pp. 205–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillingham, R.: 1974, ‘A conceptual framework for the consumer price index’, Proceedings Business and Economics Statistics Section, American Statistical Association, pp. 246–252.

  • KatznerD. W.: 1970, Static Demand Theory (McMillen, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • LiuB.: 1973, Quality of Life in the U.S. Metropolitan Areas: 1970 (Midwest Research Institute, Kansas City).

    Google Scholar 

  • LiuB.: 1974a, ‘Quality of life indicators: a preliminary investigation’, Social Indicators Research 1, pp. 187–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • LiuB.: 1974b, ‘Variations in the quality of life in the United States by state, 1970’, Review of Social Economy 32, pp. 131–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • LiuB.: 1975, ‘Differential net migration rates and the quality of life’, Rev. Econ. Stat. 57, pp. 329–337.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollak, R. A.: 1974, The treatment of the environment in the cost of living index (unpublished).

  • PollakR. A. and M. L.Wachter: 1975, ‘The relevance of the household production function and its implications for the allocation of time’, J. Polit. Econ. 83, pp. 255–277.

    Google Scholar 

  • QuirkJ. and R.Saposnik: 1968, Introduction to General Equilibrium Theory and Welfare Economics, (McGraw Hill Book Company, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Bureau of the Census, Statistical Abstract of the United States, Washington, D.C. (Various editions.)

  • WilsonJ. O.: 1970, Quality of Life in the United States: An Excursion into the New Frontier of Socio-Economic Indicators (Midwest Research Institute, Kansas City).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gillingham, R., Reece, W.S. Analytical problems in the measurement of the quality of life. Soc Indic Res 7, 91–101 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00305594

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00305594

Keywords

Navigation