Skip to main content
Log in

Rainfed mechanized farming and deforestation in central Sudan

  • Published:
Environmental and Resource Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Sudan is threatened by a serious deforestation problem. Total forested area decreased by about 20 percent over the last two decades, largely as a result of the expansion of rainfed mechanized farming (RMF). To safeguard against the problems of deforestation, the government's Mechanized Farming Corporation requires each farmer to leave at least ten percent of the total farm area under shelterbelts. Few farmers pay attention to this clause. This paper addresses the problem of RMF expansion and analyzes the effects of different factors on the preservation of shelterbelts. Results indicate that the following factors influence the decision to preserve shelterbelts: farmer's belief in the value of shelterbelts, the production of gum arabic, farm size, farmer's wealth, years a farm has been cultivated, and type of farm.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • AffanK. (1984), ‘Towards an Appraisal of tractorization Experience in Rainlands of Sudan’, Development Studies and Research Center, faculty of Economic and Social Studies, Univ. of Khartoum, Sudan, Monograph Series No. 19.

    Google Scholar 

  • AmemiyaT. (1981), ‘Qualitative Response Models: A Survey’, J. of Econ. Literature 19, 1483–1536.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atta Elmoula, M. E. (1985), ‘On the Problem of Resource Management in the Sudan’, Institute of Environmental Studies, University of Khartoum-Sudan, Environmental Monograph Series, No. 4.

  • BiswasA. K., MasakhaliaY. F. O., Odero-OgwelL. A., and PallangyoE. P. (1987), ‘Land Use and Farming Systems in the Horn of Africa’, Land Use Policy 4, 419–443.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Agricultural Economics and Statistics (1987), Input Use and Production Costs in Rainfed Mechanized Areas of Sudan: Results of 1985/86 Farm survey, Khartoum, Sudan: Ministry of Agriculture.

    Google Scholar 

  • EarlD. E. (1985), Sudan — The Economics of Wood Energy Production on Mechanized Farms. Report No. 8, Khartoum, Sudan: National Energy Administration.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehui, S. K., Hertel, T. W., and Preckel, P. V. (1987), Forest Resource Depletion, Soil Dynamics and Agricultural Productivity in the Tropics. Staff paper No. 87-22, Purdue University, Department of Agricultural Economics.

  • EhuiS. K. and HertelT. W. (1989), ‘Deforestation and Agricultural Productivity in Cote d'Ivoire’, American J. of Agricultural Economics 71, 703–711.

    Google Scholar 

  • HamoudiA. B. (1983), ‘Soil Degradation Resulting from Mechanized Agriculture in Rainfed Areas’, in ElTomM. A., ed., Preassessment of Natural Resource Issues in Sudan, Khartoum, Sudan: The Institute of Environmental Studies, University of Khartoum.

    Google Scholar 

  • HartmanR. (1976), ‘The Harvesting Decision When a Standing Forest Has Value’, Economic Inquiry 14, 52–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • LarsonB. A. and BromleyD. W. (1991), ‘Natural Resource Prices, Export Policies, and Deforestation: The Case of Sudan’, World Development 19, 1289–1297.

    Google Scholar 

  • LeeL. K. (1980), ‘The Impact of Landownership Factors on Soil Conservation’, American J. of Agricultural Economics 62, 1070–1075.

    Google Scholar 

  • LutzE. and DalyH. (1991), ‘Incentives, Regulations, and Sustainable Land Use in Costa Rica’, Environmental and Resource Economics 1, 179–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • MaddalaG. S. (1983), Limited Dependent and Qualitative Variables in Econometrics. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McFaddenD. (1981), ‘Econometric Models of Probabilistic Choice’, in C. F.Manski and D.McFadden, eds., Structural Analysis of Discrete Data with Econometric Applications, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mechanized Farming Corporation (1984), Task Force Report on Revised Role of MFC and Other Issues Relating to an Improved Performance of the Corporation, Khartoum, Sudan: MFC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Finance and Economic Planning-Sudan (1988), Environmental and Economic Aspects of Land Use Policy in Sudan with Particular Focus on Mechanized Farming, Working paper, Ministry of Finance and Economic Planning, Sudan.

    Google Scholar 

  • MusnadH. A. (1983), ‘Deforestation Resulting from Clearing Land for Agriculture, Grazing Pastures, and Charcoal Production’, in ElTomM. A., ed., Preassessment of Natural Resource Issues in Sudan, Khartoum, Sudan: The Institute of Environmental Studies, University of Khartoum.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'BrienJ. (1978), ‘How Traditional is Traditional Agriculture’ in MirghaniH. M. and Gad KarimH. A., eds., Essays on the Economy and Society of Sudan, Khartoum, Sudan: Economic and Social Research Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • SimpsonM. C. (1978), Alternative Strategies for Agricultural Development in Central Rainlands of Sudan with Special Reference to the Damazin Area. Rural Development Studies No. 3, University of Leeds, England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teklu, T., von Braun, J., and Zaki, E. (1991), Drought and Famine Relationships in Sudan: Policy Implications. Research Report 88, International Food Policy Research Institute.

  • WhitneyJ. B. R. (1987), ‘Impact of Fuelwood Use on Environmental Degradation in Sudan’, in P. D.Little, M. M.Horowitz, and A. E.Nyerges, eds., Lands at Risk in the Third World, Boulder and London: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Elnagheeb, A.H., Bromley, D.W. Rainfed mechanized farming and deforestation in central Sudan. Environmental and Resource Economics 2, 359–371 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00304967

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00304967

Key words

Navigation