Summary
We addressed the question of how reproductive success (RS) was limited in the shortlived but highly fecund meadow vole, Microtus pennsylvanicus. In so doing, we asked how differential space use patterns could affect longevity and hence RS in each sex. The sample comprised all voles achieving sexual competency over the course of a 40-week breeding season in a live-trapped population in Manomet, MA USA. Matrilineal families were determined using a radionuclide labelling technique; paternity was estimated using a maximum likelihood model. Individual RS was defined as the number of offspring successfully recruited into the trappable population per adult. We found that the variance in RS among female meadow voles was greater than the variance among males. In an attempt to explain this pattern, reproductively successful individuals were compared to reproductively unsuccessful individuals with regard to survivorship, maximum body weight achieved, and spatial mobility. The only difference between fathers and reproductively unsuccessful males was that fathers were heavier. In contrast, mothers differed from unsuccessful females in every measurement. Females lived longer than males, and mothers lived longer than either fathers or reproductively unsuccessful females. The observed differences in longevity may have been largely the result of differences in levels of mobility, assuming more mobile voles were more susceptible to predation. Mothers were significantly more site tenacious than were either males or unsuccessful females. These patterns explain the distribution of RS in our population if predation differentially affects male and female meadow voles. The meadow vole is the only non-polyandrous vertebrate reported to date in which the variance in RS among females exceeds the variance in RS among males.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bateman AJ (1948) Intrasexual selection in Drosophila. Heredity 2:349–368
Boonstra R, Rodd FH (1983) Regulation of breeding density in Microtus pennsylvanicus. J Anim Ecol 52: 757–780
Clulow FV, Mallory FF (1970) Oestrus and induced ovulation in the meadow vole, Microtus pennsylvanicus. J Reprod Fert 23:341–343
Darwin C (1871) The descent of man and selection in relation to sex. Murray, London
Fisher RA (1930) The genetical theory of natural selection. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Foltz D, Hoogland J (1981) Analysis of the mating system in the black-tailed prairie dog (Cynomys ludovicianus) by likelihood of paternity. J Mammal 62:706–712
Gray GD, Dewsbury DA (1975) A quantitative description of copulatory behavior in meadow voles (Microtus pennsylvanicus). Anim Behav 23:261–267
Hamilton WJ (1941) Reproduction of the field mouse Microtus pennsylvanicus (Ord). Cornell Univ Agr Exper Sta Mem 237:1–23
Kleinbaum DG, Kupper LL (1978) Applied regression analysis and other multivariate methods. Duxbury Press; North Scituate, Mass
Madison D (1980) Space use and social structure in meadow voles, Microtus pennsylvanicus. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 7:65–71
Madison D (1985) Activity rhythms and spacing. In: Tamarin RH (ed) Biology of new world Microtus. Spec Publ No 8, Amer Soc Mammal, pp 373–419
Pearson OP (1985) Predation. In: Tamarin RH (ed) Biology of new world Microtus. Spec Publ No 8, Am Soc Mammal, pp 535–566
Sheridan M (1987) The opportunity for selection among male and female meadow voles, Microtus pennsylvanicus. PhD Dissertation, Boston University
Sheridan M, Tamarin RH (1985) Genetic variation of salivary amylase in meadow voles. J Mammal 66:821–823
Sheridan M, Tamarin RH (1986) Kinships in a natural meadow vole population. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 19:207–211
Tamarin RH (1977a) Dispersal in island and mainland voles. Ecology 58:1044–1054
Tamarin RH (1977b) Demography of the beach vole (Microtus breweri) and the meadow vole (Microtus pennsylvanicus) in southeastern Massachusetts. Ecology 58:1310–1321
Tamarin RH, Sheridan M, Levy C (1983) Determining matrilineal kinship in natural populations of rodents using radionuclides. Can J Zool 61:271–274
Thompson EA (1976) Inference of genealogical structure. Soc Sci Inf 15:477–526
Trivers RL (1972) Parental investment and sexual selection. In: Champbell B (ed) Sexual selection and the descent of man: 1871–1971. Aldine, Chicago, Ill, pp 136–179
Vehrencamp S, Bradbury J (1984) Mating systems and ecology. In: Krebs JR, Davies NB (eds) Behavioural ecology an evolutionary approach. Sinauer Assoc, Sunderland, Mass, pp 251–278
Webster AB, Brooks RJ (1981) Social behavior of Microtus pennsylvanicus in relation to seasonal changes in demography. J Mammal 62:738–751
Zar JH (1984) Biostatistical analysis. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sheridan, M., Tamarin, R.H. Space use, longevity, and reproductive success in meadow voles. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 22, 85–90 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00303542
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00303542