Skip to main content
Log in

Nest defence by song sparrows: methodological and life history considerations

  • Published:
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Several aspects of nest defence behavior were investigated in song sparrows (Melospiza melodia) in eastern Ontario. Two independent tests were made of the hypothesis that the increase in nest defence observed through a nesting attempt is due to the birds becoming familiar with the nest threat, rather than because the nest contents increase in value to the parents. Neither test supported the hypothesis. As predicted by life history theory for species with age-independent mortality, males did not defend their nest more vigorously as they become older. Parents defended their nests less vigorously through the breeding season, contrary to the expected pattern of increased nest defence in response to declining renesting potential. This result may be attributable to a decline in offspring value through the breeding season. Nest defence behavior of mated individuals was positively correlated, independent of factors such as offspring age, renesting potential and brood size. From this result it is proposed that a source of variation in nest defence behavior may be individuals basing their own response on their mate's response in a positive feedback fashion. Males defended nests less vigorously than females, consistent with the expectation that males have lower certainty of parentage in the offspring. It is proposed that variation in paternal uncertainty could contribute to the unexplained variation reported in nest defence studies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andersson M, Wiklund CG, Rundgren H (1980) Parental defence of offspring: a model and an example. Anim Behav 28:536–542

    Google Scholar 

  • Arcese P, Smith JNM (1985) Phenotypic correlates and ecological consequences of dominance in song sparrows. J Anim Ecol 54:817–830

    Google Scholar 

  • Barash DP (1975) Evolutionary aspects of parental behavior: distraction behavior of the alpine accentor. Wilson Bull 87:367–373

    Google Scholar 

  • Barash DP (1980) Predictive sociobiology: mate selection in damselfishes and brood defence in white-crowned sparrows. In: Barlow GW, Silverberg J (eds) Sociobiology: beyond nature/nurture? AAAS, Washington, pp 209–226

    Google Scholar 

  • Blancher PJ, Robertson RJ (1982) Kingbird aggression: Does it deter predation? Anim Behav 30:929–930

    Google Scholar 

  • Breitwisch R (1988) Sex differences in defence of eggs and nestlings by northern mockingbirds Minus polyglottus. Anim Behav 36:62–72

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunton DH (1986) Fatal antipredator behavior of a killdeer. Wilson Bull 98:605–607

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman RC (1987) Does experience with predators affect parental investment? Auk 104:791–792

    Google Scholar 

  • Curio E (1975) The functional organization of anti-predator behavior in the pied flycatcher: a study of avian visual perception. Anim Behav 23:1–115

    Google Scholar 

  • Curio E, Regelmann K (1985) The behavioural dynamics of great tits (Parus major) approaching a predator. Z Tierpsychol 69:3–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Curio E, Regelmann K, Zimmermann U (1984) The defence of first and second broods by great tit (Parus major) parents: a test of predictive sociobiology. Z Tierpsychol 66:100–127

    Google Scholar 

  • Deevey ES Jr (1947) Life tables for natural populations of animals. Quart Rev Biol 22:283–314

    Google Scholar 

  • Eckert CG, Weatherhead PJ (1987) Male characteristics, parental quality and the study of mate choice in the red-winged blackbird (Agelaius phoeniceus). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 20:35–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman O (1974) Natural selection and a cost ceiling on reproductive effort. Am Nat 108:247–268

    Google Scholar 

  • Greig-Smith PW (1980) Parental investment in nest defence by stonechats (Saxicola torquata). Anim Behav 28:604–619

    Google Scholar 

  • Halliburton R, Mewaldt LR (1976) Survival and mobility in a population of Pacific coast song sparrows (Melospiza melodia gouldii). Condor 78:499–504

    Google Scholar 

  • Knight RL, Temple SA (1986a) Nest defence in the American goldfinch. Anim Behav 34:887–897

    Google Scholar 

  • Knight RL, Temple SA (1986b) Why does intensity of avian nest defence increase during the nesting cycle? Auk 103:318–327

    Google Scholar 

  • Lack D (1946) Do juvenile birds survive less well than adults? British Birds 39:258–264

    Google Scholar 

  • Loery G, Pollock KH, Nichols JD, Hines JE (1987) Age-specificity of black-capped chickadee survival rates: analysis of capture-recapture data. Ecology 68:1038–1044

    Google Scholar 

  • Moller AP (1984) Parental defence of offspring in the barn swallow. Bird Behav 5:110–117

    Google Scholar 

  • Moller AP (1988) Paternity and paternal care in the swallow, Hirundo rustics. Anim Behav 36:996–1005

    Google Scholar 

  • Montgomerie RD, Weatherhead PJ (1988) Risks and rewards of nest defence by parent birds. Quart Rev Biol 63:167–187

    Google Scholar 

  • Nol E, Smith JNM (1987) Effects of age and breeding experience on seasonal reproductive success in the song sparrow. J Anim Ecol 56:301–313

    Google Scholar 

  • Pianka ER, Parker WS (1975) Age-specific reproductive tactics. Am Nat 109:456–464

    Google Scholar 

  • Pugesek BH (1983) The relationship between parental age and reproductive effort in the California gull (Larus californicus). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 13:161–171

    Google Scholar 

  • Pugesek BH (1987) Age-specific survivorship in relation to clutch size and fledging success in California gulls. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 21:217–221

    Google Scholar 

  • Regelmann K, Curio E (1983) Determinants of brood defence in the great tit Parus major L. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 13:131–145

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricklefs RE (1973) Ecology. Chiron Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricklefs RE (1974) Fecundity, mortality and avian demography. In: Farner DS (ed) Breeding biology of birds. Nat Acad Sci Washington, pp 336–435

    Google Scholar 

  • Trivers RL (1972) Parental investment and sexual selection. In: Campbell B (ed) Sexual selection and the descent of man 1871–1971. Aldine, Chicago, pp 136–179

    Google Scholar 

  • Weatherhead PJ (1979) Do savannah sparrows commit the Concorde fallacy? Behav Ecol Sociobiol 5:373–381

    Google Scholar 

  • Weatherhead PJ (1982) Risk taking by red-winged blackbirds and the Concorde fallacy. Z Tierpsychol 60:199–208

    Google Scholar 

  • Weatherhead PJ, Boak KA (1986) Site infidelity in song sparrows. Anim Behav 34:1299–1310

    Google Scholar 

  • Westneat DF (1988) Male parental care and extrapair copulations in the indigo bunting. Auk 105:149–160

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams GC (1966) Natural selection, costs of reproduction and a refinement of Lack's principle. Am Nat 100:687–690

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Weatherhead, P.J. Nest defence by song sparrows: methodological and life history considerations. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 25, 129–136 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00302929

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00302929

Keywords

Navigation