Abstract
Male and female subjects completed a dogmatism scale and a feminism scale and provided information about their age, amount of education, and present occupation. The variables correlating with feminism depended upon the sex of the respondent. The more dogmatic individuals of both sexes supported feminism less than the less dogmatic individuals, with the effect being somewhat stronger for the males. The older female supported feminism less than the younger female. Age was unrelated to feminism for the males. The poorly educated female supported feminism less than the better-educated female, but the effect was diminished when dogmatism and age were held constant. Educational level was unrelated to feminism for males. The differences between the sexes are discussed in the context of perceptions of issues and situational ambiguity.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
References
Dempewolff, J. A. Development and validation of a feminism scale. Psychological Reports, 1974, 34, 651–657.
Goldschmidt, J., Gergen, M. M., Quigley, K., & Gergen, K. J. The women's liberation movement: Attitudes and action. Journal of Personality, 1974, 42, 601–617.
Hollingshead, A. B., & Redlich, F. C. Social class and mental illness: A community study. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1958.
Hovland, C. I., & Janis, I. L. Summary and implications for future research. In C. I. Hovland & I. L. Janis (Eds.), Personality and persuasibility. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1959
Katz, D. Factors affecting social change: A social-psychological interpretation. Journal of Social Issues, 1974, 30(3), 159–180.
Kirtley, D., & Harkless, R. Some personality and attitudinal correlates of dogmatism. Psychological Reports, 1969, 24, 851–854.
Marlowe, L. Social Psychology: An interdisciplinary approach to human behavior (2nd ed.). Boston: Holbrook Press, Inc., 1975.
Sears, D. O. Political behavior. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (2nd ed.; Vol. 5). Reading, Mass: Addison-Wesley, 1968.
Tavris, C. Who likes women's liberation — and why: The case of the unliberated liberals. Journal of Social Issues, 1973, 29(4), 175–198.
Troldahl, V. C., & Powell, F. A. A short-form of the dogmatism scale for use in field studies. Social Forces, 1965, 44, 211–214.
Vacchiano, R. B., Strauss, P. S., & Hochman, L. The open and closed mind: A review of dogmatism. Psychological Bulletin, 1969, 71, 261–273.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
The authors would like to thank Joan Joesting for her comments on an earlier version of this paper. Support for the statistical analyses was given by the Maryland State College Information Center.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Whitehead, G.I., Tawes, S.L. Dogmatism, age, and educational level as correlates of feminism for males and females. Sex Roles 2, 401–405 (1976). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00302809
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00302809