Skip to main content
Log in

Engel functions revisited

  • Published:
Social Indicators Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Engel functions for the United States, based on cross-sectional data for 1972–73, are compared with those for 1960–61. Elasticities of expenditure for major categories of consumption are consistent with those found in other countries at various levels of economic development. However, elasticities for specific items within major categories varied markedly. Rental housing emerges as an inferior good. Superior goods are grouped into four major classes based on expenditure elasticities. Low elasticities tended to decline over time and were associated with positive family size elasticities. Expenditure elasticities that were high tended to become still higher over time and were associated with negative family size elasticities. An examination of expenditure elasticities across income classes indicates that ‘rich’ and ‘poor’ families have become more alike with respect to expenditures for ‘necessities’ but more unlike with respect to expenditures for ‘luxuries’ — education, recreation, owner housing, and men's and women's clothing. As incomes have risen, the composition of consumption has changed, as have the meaning and character of poverty. Questions are raised concerning the significance and research implications of the declining achievement/aspiration ratio for certain kinds of goods and services for many consumers within the United States and for most consumers in countries where incomes have risen less relatively and absolutely than have those of families in highly developed economies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Bibliography

  • Aitchison, J. and J. A. C. Brown: 1957, The Lognormal Distribution, University of Cambridge, Department of Applied Economics, Monograph No. 4 (At the University Press, Cambridge).

  • AllenR. G. D. and A. L.Bowley: 1935, Family Expenditure (Staples, London).

    Google Scholar 

  • ArchibaldG. C. and R. G.Lipsey: 1967, An Introduction to a Mathematical Treatment of Economics (Weidenfeld and Nicolson, London).

    Google Scholar 

  • BartenA. P.: 1964, ‘Family composition, prices and expenditure patterns’, in: Econometric Analysis for National Economic Planning, HartP. E., G.Mills, and J. K.Whitaker (eds.): (Butterworth, London).

    Google Scholar 

  • BradyD. S. and R. D.Friedman: 1947, ‘Savings and the income distribution’. Conference on Research in Income and Wealth 10 (National Bureau of Economic Research, New York), pp. 250–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • BradyD. and F. G.Adams: 1962, ‘The diffusion of new products and their impact on consumer expenditures’, Report on a study prepared at the University of Pennsylvania, Department of Economics, Economics Research Services Unit, for United States Bureau of Labor Statistics, mimeographed (University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia).

    Google Scholar 

  • BransonW. H.: 1979, Macroeconomic Theory and Policy, 2nd. ed. (Harper and Row, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • BrownA. and A.Deaton: 1972, ‘Survey in applied economics: models of consumer behavior’, Economic Journal 82, pp. 1145–1236.

    Google Scholar 

  • CarlsonM. D.: 1974, ‘The 1972–73 Consumer Expenditure Survey’, Monthly Labor Review 97, pp. 16–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeatonA. and J.Muellbauer: 1980, Economics and Consumer Behavior (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge).

    Google Scholar 

  • DouglasE.: 1975, Economics of Marketing (Harper and Row, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • DuesenberryJ. S.: 1949, Income, Saving and the Theory of Consumer Behavior (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.)

    Google Scholar 

  • EngelE.: 1857, ‘Die Productions-und Consumptionsverhältnisse des Königreichs Sachsen’, reprinted as ‘Die Levenskosten Belgischer Arbeiter-Familien früher und jetzt’, International Statistical Institute Bulletin 9 (1895), pp. 1–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • FerberR.: 1973, ‘Consumer economics, a survey’, Journal of Economic Literature 11, pp. 1303–1342.

    Google Scholar 

  • FriedmanM.: 1957, A Theory of the Consumption Function, National Bureau of Economic Research, General Series No. 63 (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).

    Google Scholar 

  • GormanW. M.: 1976, ‘Tricks with utility functions’, in ArtisM. and R.Noby (eds.): Essays in Economic Analysis (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge).

    Google Scholar 

  • HarrodR. F.: 1958, ‘The possibility of economic satiety — use of economic growth for improving the quality of education and leisure’, in: Problems of United States Economic Development 1 (Committee for Economic Development, New York), pp. 207–213.

    Google Scholar 

  • HirschF.: 1976, The Social Limits of Growth (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.).

    Google Scholar 

  • HouthakkerH. S.: 1957, ‘An international comparison of household expenditure patterns, commemorating the centenary of Engel's law’, Econometrica 25, pp. 532–551.

    Google Scholar 

  • HouthakkerH. S.: 1960, ‘Additive preference’, Econometrica 28, pp. 244–257.

    Google Scholar 

  • HouthakkerH. S. and L. D.Taylor: 1970, Consumer Demand in the United States: Analyses and Projections, 2nd. ed. (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.).

    Google Scholar 

  • International Labour Office: 1967, 1974, 1979, Household Income and Expenditure Statistics No. 1, 1950–64 (Geneva, 1967); No. 2, 1960–72 (Geneva, 1974); No. 3, 1968–76 (Geneva, 1979).

  • LeibensteinH.: 1976, Beyond Economic Man (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.).

    Google Scholar 

  • LluchC., A. A.Powell, and R. A.Williams: 1977, Patterns in Household Demand and Saving, World Bank Research Publication (Oxford University Press, Oxford).

    Google Scholar 

  • PhlipsL.: 1974, Applied Consumption Analysis (North-Holland Publ. Co., Amsterdam, Oxford).

    Google Scholar 

  • Prais, S. H. and H. S. Houthakker: 1955, The Analysis of Family Budgets, University of Cambridge, Department of Applied Economics, Monograph No. 4 (At the University Press, Cambridge), 2nd. impr. abr. (1971).

  • SalatheL. E.: 1979, Household Expenditure Patterns in the United States, United States Department of Agriculture, Economics, Statistics, and Cooperative Service, National Economic Analysis Division, Technical Bulletin No. 1603 (United States Department of Agriculture, Washington D.C.).

    Google Scholar 

  • ScitovskyT.: 1976, The Joyless Economy (Oxford University Press, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • ShiskinJ.: 1974, ‘Updating the consumer price index — an overview’, Monthly Labor Review 97, pp. 3–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • StiglerG. J.: 1954, ‘The early history of empirical studies of consumer behavior’, Journal of Political Economy, 62, pp. 95–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • United States Bureau of Labor Statistics: 1962–1966, Survey of Consumer Expenditures and Income, BLS Report 237, Nos. 1–93 (United States Department of Labor, Washington D.C.).

    Google Scholar 

  • United States Bureau of Labor Statistics: 1978, Consumer Expenditure Survey: Integrated Diary and Interview Survey Data, 1972–73, Bulletin 1992 (Government Printing Office, Washington D.C.).

    Google Scholar 

  • WoldH. and L.Juréen: 1953, Demand Analysis (John Wiley, New York).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Douglas, E. Engel functions revisited. Soc Indic Res 11, 139–165 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00302746

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00302746

Keywords

Navigation