Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology

, Volume 5, Issue 1, pp 87–92 | Cite as

Costs and benefits of male-male competition in the orb weaving spider, Nephila clavipes

  • Terry E. Christenson
  • Kenneth C. GoistJr.


  1. 1.

    The reproductive benefits and predatory costs of male-male competition were studied in the orb weaver, Nephila clavipes. During the breeding season adult males search for females, and congregate on their orbs.

  2. 2.

    Males compete for hub position proximal to the female, with the largest male assuming hub status. Smaller males move about the periphery of the orb.

  3. 3.

    Hub males gained the advantage of almost exclusive mating, and a potential advantage of feeding on prey captured by the female. Peripheral males pursued various alternatives, but rarely mated.

  4. 4.

    Females, the larger sex, occasionally preyed on males. The cost to males from female predation was no greater for hub than peripheral males.



Adult Male Breeding Season Large Male Small Male Reproductive Benefit 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Alcock, J., Jones, C.E., Buchmann, S.L.: Male mating strategies in the bee Centris pallida Fox (Anthrophoridae: Hymenoptera). Am. Nat. 111, 145–155 (1977)Google Scholar
  2. Aspey, W.P.: Wolf spider sociobiology: 1. Agonistic display and dominance-subordinance relationships in adult male Schizocosa crassipes. Behaviour 62, 103–141 (1977)Google Scholar
  3. Barash, D.P.: Sociobiology and behavior. New York: Elsevier 1977Google Scholar
  4. Comstock, J.H.: The spider book. Ithaca: Comstock 1948Google Scholar
  5. Constantz, G.D.: Behavioral ecology of mating in the male Gila topminnow, Poeciliopsis occidentalis (Cyprinodontiformes: Poeciliidae). Ecology 56, 966–973 (1975)Google Scholar
  6. Jackson, R.R.: Predation as a selection factor in the mating strategy of the jumping spider Phidippus johnsoni (Salticidae, Araneae). Psyche 83, 243–255 (1976)Google Scholar
  7. Kaestner, A.: Inyertebrate zoology, Vol. 2. New York: John Wiley 1968Google Scholar
  8. Le Boeuf, B.J.: Sex and evolution. In: Sex and behavior: Status and prospectus. McGill, T., Dewsbury, D., Sachs, B. (eds.). New York: Plenum (in press) 1979Google Scholar
  9. Mason, W.A., Lott, D.F.: Ethology and comparative psychology. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 27, 129–154 (1976)Google Scholar
  10. Moore, C.W.: The life cycle, habitat and variation in selected web parameters in the spider, Nephila clavipes Koch (Araneidae). Am. Midl. Nat. 98, 95–108 (1977)Google Scholar
  11. Platnick, N.: The evolution of courtship behaviour in spiders. Bull. Br. Arach. Soc. 2, 40–47 (1971)Google Scholar
  12. Robinson, M.H., Robinson, B.: Ecology and behavior of the giant wood spider Nephila maculata (Fabricius) in New Guinea. Smithson. Contrib. Zool. 149, 1–76 (1973)Google Scholar
  13. Robinson, M.H., Robinson, B.: The ecology and behavior of Nephila maculata: A supplement. Smithson. Contrib. Zool. 218, 1–22 (1976)Google Scholar
  14. Rovner, J.S.: Territoriality in the sheet-web spider Linyphia triangularis (Clerck) (Araneae, Linyphidae). Z. Tierpsychol. 25, 232–242 (1968)Google Scholar
  15. Savory, T.: Arachnida, New York: Academic 1977Google Scholar
  16. Trivers, R.L.: Sexual selection and parental investment. In: Sexual selection and the descent of man. Campbell, B. (ed.). Chicago: Aldine 1972Google Scholar
  17. Turnbull, A.L.: Ecology of the true spiders (Araneomorphae). Annu. Rev. Entomol. 18, 305–347 (1973)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1979

Authors and Affiliations

  • Terry E. Christenson
    • 1
  • Kenneth C. GoistJr.
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyTulane UniversityNew OrleansUSA

Personalised recommendations