Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology

, Volume 5, Issue 1, pp 55–66 | Cite as

Reconciliation and consolation among chimpanzees

  • Frans B. M. de Waal
  • Angeline van Roosmalen


  1. 1.

    After agonistic interactions among chimpanzees, former opponents often come into non-violent body contact. The present paper gives a quantitative description of such contacts among the chimpanzees of a large semi-free-living colony at the Arnhem Zoo, in order to establish whether these post-conflict contacts are of a specific nature.

  2. 2.

    Our data indicate that former opponents preferentially make body contact with each other rather than with third partners. They tend to contact each other shortly after the conflict and show special behaviour patterns during these first contacts. Data on contacts of the aggressed party with third animals indicate that such contacts are characterized by the same special behaviour patterns as first interopponent contacts. These patterns are: ‘kiss’, ‘embrace’, ‘hold-out-hand’, ‘submissive vocalization’ and ‘touch’.

  3. 3.

    Such interactions apparently serve an important socially homeostatic function and we termed them ‘reconciliation’ (i.e. contact between former opponents) and ‘consolation’ (i.e. contact of the aggressed party with a third animal). According to our data, ‘kissing’ is characteristic of reconciliation and ‘embracing’ of consolation.



Behaviour Pattern Special Behaviour Quantitative Description Specific Nature Agonistic Interaction 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Blurton-Jones, N.G., Trollope, J.: Social behaviour of stump-tailed macaques in captivity. Primates 9, 365–394 (1968)Google Scholar
  2. Ehrlich, A., Musicant, A.: Social and individual behaviors in captive slow lorises. Behaviour 60, 195–220 (1977)Google Scholar
  3. Eibl-Eibesfeldt, I.: Der vorprogrammierte Mensch. München: Deutscher Taschenbuch Verlag 1976Google Scholar
  4. Ellefson, J.O.: Territorial behavior in the common white-handed gibbon, Hylobates lar. In: Primates; studies in adaptation and variability. Jay, P. (ed.), pp. 180–199, New York: Holt 1968Google Scholar
  5. Everitt, B.S.: The analysis of contingency tables. New York: Wiley 1977Google Scholar
  6. Hooff, J.A.R.A.M. van. The Arnhem Zoo chimpanzee consortium: An attempt to create an ecologically and socially acceptable habitat. Int. Zoo Yearb. 13 195–205 (1973)Google Scholar
  7. Hooff, J.A.R.A.M. van: A structural analysis of the social behaviour of a semi-captive group of chimpanzees. In: Social communication and movement. Cranach, M. von, Vine, I. (eds.), pp. 75–162. London: Academic 1974Google Scholar
  8. Kaplan, E.L., Meier, P.: Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations. Am. Stat. Assoc. J. 53, 457–481 (1958)Google Scholar
  9. Kummer, H.: Soziales Verhalten einer Mantelpavian-Gruppe. Bern, Stuttgart: Verlag Hans Huber 1957Google Scholar
  10. Lawick-Goodall, J. van: A preliminary report on expressive movements and communication in the Gombe Stream chimpanzees. In: Primates; studies in adaptation and variability. Jay, P. (ed.), pp. 313–374. New York: Holt 1968aGoogle Scholar
  11. Lawick-Goodall, J. van: Behaviour of free-living chimpanzees of the Gombe Stream Area. Anim. Behav. Monogr. 3, 161–311 (1968b)Google Scholar
  12. Lindburg, D.G.: Grooming behavior as a regulator of social interactions in rhesus, monkeys. In: Behavioral regulators of behavior in primates. Carpenter, C. (ed.), pp. 85–105. Lewisburg, PA, USA: Bucknell Univ. 1973Google Scholar
  13. Marler, P.: On animal aggression; the roles of strangeness and familiarity. Am. Psychol. 31, 239–246 (1976)Google Scholar
  14. Mason, W.A.: Sociability and social organization in monkeys and apes. In: Advances in experimental social psychology, Vol. 1. Berkowitz, L. (ed.), pp. 277–305. New York: Academic 1964Google Scholar
  15. Nishida, T.: Social behavior and relationship among wild chimpanzees of the Mahali Mountains. Primates 11, 47–87 (1970)Google Scholar
  16. Okano, T., Asami, C., Haruki, Y., Sasaki, M., Itoigawa, N., Shinohara, S., Tsuzuki, T.: Social relations in a chimpanzee colony. In: Behavioral regulators of behavior in primates. Carpenter, C. (ed.), pp. 85–105. Lewisburg, PA, USA: Bucknell Univ. 1973Google Scholar
  17. Pfeffer, P.: Le mouflon de Corse (Ovis ammon musimom); position systématique, écologie et éthologie comparées. Mammalia 31 [Suppl.] (1967)Google Scholar
  18. Poirier, F.E.: Dominance structure of the Nilgiri langer (Presbytis johnii) of South Inida. Folia Primatol. 12, 161–186 (1970)Google Scholar
  19. Rasa, O.A.E.: The ethology and sociology of the Dwarf Mongoose (Helogale undulata rufula). Z. Tierpsychol. 43, 337–406 (1977)Google Scholar
  20. Rijksen, H.D.: A field study on Sumatran Orang Utans (Pongo pygmaeus); ecology, behaviour and conservation. Meded. Landbouwhogesch. Wageningen 78-2,421 (1978)Google Scholar
  21. Sade, D.S.: Some aspects of parent-offspring and sibling relations in a group of rhesus monkeys, with a discussion of grooming. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 23, 1–117 (1965)Google Scholar
  22. Seyfarth, R.M.: Social relationships among adult female baboons. Anim. Behav. 24, 917–938 (1976)Google Scholar
  23. Waal, F.B.M. de: Exploitative and familiarity-dependent support strategies in a colony of semi-free living chimpanzees. Behaviour 66, 268–312 (1978)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1979

Authors and Affiliations

  • Frans B. M. de Waal
    • 1
    • 2
  • Angeline van Roosmalen
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Laboratory of Comparative PhysiologyState University UtrechtUtrechtThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Burgers' DierenparkArnhemThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations