Skip to main content
Log in

A conceptualization and research strategy for the study of ecological aspects of the quality of life

  • Published:
Social Indicators Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The centerpiece of this paper is a proposed model identifying the various factors that ought to be brought into a thorough study of ecological aspects of quality of life. The model suggests that in addition to studying the physical, economic and social situation of an individual it also is important to study his beliefs about how the world works, his personal lifestyle, and his values, goals, aspirations and needs if one is to make adequate inferences about what produces the level of quality of life that he experiences. The model also shows that it is important to look at similar variables for a community or a society in order to arrive at inferences about quality of life for that community or society. Personal and societal learning is a dynamic factor in the model. The paper concludes with a discussion of strategies for operationalizing these factors in empirical studies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Bibliography

  • Allardt, E.: Dimensions of Welfare in a Comparative Scandinavian Study, (University of Helsinki, Research Group for Comparative Sociology, No. 9, 1975).

  • Allardt, E.: ‘On the relationship between objective and subjective predicaments’ (Helsinki, Research Group for Comparative Sociology, University of Helsinki, 1977), mimeo.

  • AndrewsF. M. and S. B.Withey: Social Indicators of Well-Being (Plenum, New York, 1976).

    Google Scholar 

  • AtkinsonT.: Is satisfaction a good measure of the perceived quality of life? (Institute of Bahavioral Research, York University, Toronto, 1977), mimeo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, T.: ‘Trends in Life satisfaction among Canadians, 1968–1977’, paper delivered at the IX World Congress of Sociology, Uppsala, Sweden, August 1978a.

  • AtkinsonT.: ‘Public perceptions on the quality of life’ (Institute of Behavioral Research, York University, Toronto, 1978b), mimeo; included in Perspectives Canada III, pp. 277–292.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, T. and M. Murray: ‘Values, domains and the perceived quality of life’, presented at the American Psychological Assn. Annual Meeting, New York, September 1979.

  • BauerR. (ed.): Social Indicators (MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1966).

    Google Scholar 

  • CampbellA.: The Sense of Well-Being in America (McGraw Hill, New York, 1981).

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, A., P. E. Converse, and W. L. Rogers: The Quality of American Life (Russell Sage Foundation, 1976).

  • Canada, Statistics Canada: Perspectives Canada (Printing and Publishing, Ottawa, Canada, 1974).

    Google Scholar 

  • Canada, Statistics Canada: Perspectives Canada II (Printing and Publishing, Ottawa, Canada, 1977).

    Google Scholar 

  • Canada, Statistics Canada: Perspectives Canada III (Printing and Publishing, Ottawa, Canada, 1980).

    Google Scholar 

  • CantrilH.: The Pattern of Human Concerns (Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick, N.J., 1965).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallup, G.: ‘Human needs and satisfactions: A global survey’, Public Opinion Quarterly 40 (1976).

  • Gross, B. (ed.): Social Goals and Indicators of American Society, Vols. I and II; The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, Vol 371 (May, 1967) and Vol. 373 (September, 1967).

  • HallJ.: ‘Subjective measures of quality of life in Britain: 1971 to 1975, Some developments and trends’, Social Trends, No. 7 (London, Her Majesty's Stationery Office, 1976).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hankiss, E.: ‘Quality of life models’, in Indicators of Environmental Quality and Quality of Life (Uncesco Reports and Papers in the Social Sciences, No. 38, Paris, 1978), pp. 58–88.

  • HankissE., R.Manchin, and L.Fustes: Cross-Cultural Quality of Life Research: An Outline for a Conceptual Framework and Some Methodological Issues (Center for Quality of Life Research, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Budapest, 1978).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hankiss, E., R. Manchin, and L. Fustes: ‘The role of goals in people's lives: An analysis based on the data of the Hungarian quality of life survey 1978–1980’ (Uncesco, SS/CS/18/80/1, Paris, 1980).

  • JonesM. and M.Flax: The Quality of Life in Metropolitan Washington, D.C.: Some Statistical Benchmarks (Urban Institute Paper, Washington, D.C., March, 1970).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kettering Foundation and Gallup International Research Institutes: Human Needs and Satisfactions (Summary Volume, Princeton, New Jersey, Gallup Institutes, 1977).

    Google Scholar 

  • LiuB.: Quality of Life Indicators in U.S. Metropolitan Areas: A Comprehensive Assessment (Praeger, New York, 1976).

    Google Scholar 

  • LiuB. and C.Anderson: ‘Income, energy requirements, and the quality of life indicators: An international comparison, 1975’ (Midwest Research Institute, Kansas City, 1979).

    Google Scholar 

  • MaransR. W., J. D.Wellman, S. J.Newman, and J. A.Kruse: Waterfront Living: A Report on Permanent and Seasonal Residents in Northern Michigan (Institute for Social Research, Ann Arbor, Michigan, 1976).

    Google Scholar 

  • MaransR. W. and J. D.Wellman: The Quality of Non-metropolitan Living: Evaluations, Behaviors, and Expectations of Northern Michigan Residents (University of Michigan Institute for Social Research, Ann Arbor, Fall 1977).

    Google Scholar 

  • MasonR., G.Faulkenberry, and A.Seidler: The Quality of Life as Oregonians See It (Oregon State University, Corvallis, December, 1975), mimeo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milbrath, L. W.: Quality of Life on the Niagara Frontier Region of New York State (Environmental Studies Center, State University of New York at Buffalo, December, 1977), mimeo.

  • MilbrathL. W.: ‘Indicators of environmental quality’, in Indicators of Environmental Quality and Quality of Life, Reports and Papers in the Social Sciences, No. 38, (Unesco, Paris, 1978), pp. 32–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • MilbrathL. W.: ‘Policy relevant quality of life research’, The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 444 (July, 1979), pp. 32–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • MilbrathL. W.: ‘Values, lifestyles and basic beliefs as influences on perceived quality of life’, (Unesco, Paris SS/CS/18/80/5, 1980).

    Google Scholar 

  • MilbrathL. W.: ‘Environmental values and beliefs of the general public and leaders in the United States, England and Germany’ in DeanMann (ed.), Environmental Policy formation: The impact of values, Ideology and Standards (Lexington Books, Lexington, Mass., 1981a).

    Google Scholar 

  • MilbrathL. W.: General Report: U.S. Component of a Comparative Study of Environmental Beliefs and Values (Environmental Studies Center, SUNY/Buffalo, January 1981b).

    Google Scholar 

  • MoumT.: ‘The role of values and life goals in quality of life: On measuring and predicting subjective well-being — A pilot study’ (Unesco, SS/CS/18/80/2, Paris, 1980).

    Google Scholar 

  • MukherjeeR.: ‘On the study of quality of life in India’ (Uncesco SS/CS/18/80/4, Paris, 1980).

    Google Scholar 

  • Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development: List of Social Concerns Common to Most OECD Countries (Paris, 1973).

  • Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development: Measuring Social Well-Being: A Progress Report on the Development of Social Indicators (Paris, 1976).

  • Rescher, N.: Welfare: The Social Issues in Philosophical Perspective (Pittsburgh, 1972).

  • RokeachM.: Beliefs, Attitudes and Values (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, 1968).

    Google Scholar 

  • RokeachM.: The Nature of Human Values (Free Press, New York, 1973).

    Google Scholar 

  • SchwartzP. and J.Ogilvy: The Emergent Paradigm: Changing Patterns of Thought and Belief (Stanford Research Institute International, Menlo Park, California, VALS Report No. 7, April 1979).

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Government, Office of Management and Budget: Social Indicators 1973 (U.S. G.P.O., Washington, D.C.).

  • U.S. Government, Social Indicators 1976 (U.S. G.P.O., Washington, D.C.).

  • U.S. Government, Social Indicators III (U.S. G.P.O., Washington, D.C., 1981).

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Government, Department of Health, Education and Welfare: Toward a Social Report (U.S. G.P.O., Washington, D.C., 1969).

    Google Scholar 

  • Unesco: Indicators of Environmental Quality and Quality of Life SS/CH/38 of Reports and Papers in the Social Sciences (Paris, 1978).

  • YankelovichD. and B.Lefkowitz: ‘National growth: The question of the 80's’, Public Opinion 3 (1980), pp. 44–57.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Milbrath, L.W. A conceptualization and research strategy for the study of ecological aspects of the quality of life. Soc Indic Res 10, 133–157 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00302507

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00302507

Keywords

Navigation