Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Cerebrospinal compensation in hydrocephalic children

  • Original Papers
  • Published:
Child's Nervous System Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

One hundred and fifteen cases of hydrocephalus in children were analysed. Cerebrospinal compensatory reserve was assessed by a computerized, constant rate, lumbar infusion test. Head circumference and ventricular size were measured and a psychometric examination carried out. A classification of hydrocephalus based on resting cerebrospinal fluid pressure (CSFP) and resistance to cerebrospinal fluid outflow (RCSF) was introduced. Parameters of compensatory reserve were compared in atrophy (low CSFP, low RCSF), normal-pressure hydrocephalus (low CSFP, increased RCSF), non-communicating hydrocephalus (high CSFP, low RCSF) and acute hydrocephalus (high CSFP and increased RCSF). Significant differences were found between the factors describing compensatory ability in these groups. Sixty-two patients could be classified on the basis of resting CSFR and RCSF. Differentiation between the types of hydrocephalus was shown to be more accurate when all variables measured during the pressure-volume test were considered. The patterns of the time courses of CSFP during rate infusion tests in the different types of hydrocephalus are presented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Albeck MJ, Borgesen SE, Gjerris F, et al (1991) Intracranial pressure and cerebrospinal fluid outflow conductance in healthy subjects. J Neurosurg 74:597–600

    Google Scholar 

  2. Borgesen SE, Gjerris F (1987) Relationships between intracranial pressure, ventricular size and resistance to CSF outflow. J Neurosurg 67:535–539

    Google Scholar 

  3. Borgesen SE, Gjerris F, et al (1989) Measurement of resistance to CSF outflow-clinical experiences in 333 patients. In: Hoff JT, Betz AL (eds) Intracranial pressure 7. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 353–355

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cardia E, Gambardella G, Lucerna S, Cambria S (1987) Computerized use of CSFP data. Preliminary elements on the shunt patient. Child's Nerv Syst 3:292–293

    Google Scholar 

  5. Chazal J, Irthum B, Janny P (1989) Hydrocephalie ventriculosous-arachnoidienne d'origine villositaire. Neurochirurgie 35:379–382, 410

    Google Scholar 

  6. Czosnyka M, Wollk-Laniewski P, Batorski L, Zaworski W (1988) Analysis of intracranial pressure waveform during infusion test. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 93:140–145

    Google Scholar 

  7. Czosnyka M, Batorski L, Laniewski P, et al (1990) A computer system for the identification of cerebrospinal compensatory model. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 105:112–116

    Google Scholar 

  8. Di Rocco C, Caldarelli M, Mangiola A, Milani A (1988) The lumbar subarachnoid infusion test in infants. Child's Nerv Syst 4:16–21

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hirsch JF, Pierre-Kahn A, Renier D, et al (1984) The Dandy Walker malformation. J Neurosurg 61:515–522

    Google Scholar 

  10. Holtzer GJ, Lange SA de (1973) Shunt-independent arrest of hydrocephalus. J Neurosurg 39:698–701

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kosteljanetz M, Nehen AM, Kaalund J (1990) Cerebrospinal outflow resistance measurement in the selection of patients for shunt surgery in the normal pressure hydrocephalus syndrome. A controlled trial. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 104:48–53

    Google Scholar 

  12. Lundar T (1989) The use of intraventricular resorption test (IVT) in the management of hydrocephalic children. Z Kinderchir 44 [Suppl1]:27–28

    Google Scholar 

  13. Meter U, Knopf W, Schmidt V, et al (1990) Typische CT-Befunde während des intrathekalen Infusionstestes bei posttraumatischen Störungen der Liqurdynamik. Zentralbl Neurochir 51:102–106

    Google Scholar 

  14. Oi S, Matsumoto S (1987) Infantile hydrocephalus and the slit ventricle syndrome in early infancy. Child's Nerv Syst 3:145–150

    Google Scholar 

  15. Oi S, Matsumoto S (1989) Hydrocephalus in premature infants. Characteristic and therapeutic problems. Child's Nerv Syst 5:76–82

    Google Scholar 

  16. Sato H, Sato N, Tamaki N, Matsumoto S (1988) Threshold of cerebral perfusion pressure as a prognostic factor in hydrocephalus during infancy. Child's Nerv Syst 4:274–278

    Google Scholar 

  17. Shapiro K, Fried A, (1988) The theoretical requirements of shunt designs as determined by biochemical testing in paediatric hydrocephalus. Child's Nerv Syst 4:348–353

    Google Scholar 

  18. Shapiro K, Fried A, Marmarou A (1985) Biomechanical and hydrodynamic characterization of the hydrocephalic infant. J Neurosurg 63:69–75

    Google Scholar 

  19. Tans JT, Poortvliet DCJ (1989) Relationship between compliance and resistance to outflow of CSF in adult hydrocephalus. J Neurosurg 71:59–62

    Google Scholar 

  20. Tans JT, Poortvliet DCJ (1989) Does compliance predict ventricular reduction after shunting for normal pressure hydrocephalus. In: Hoff JT, Betz AL (eds) Intracranial pressure 7. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 386–389

    Google Scholar 

  21. Wocjan J, Sliwka S, Roszkowski M, et al (1986) Analysis of CSF dynamics by computerized pressure-elastance resorption test in hydrocephalic children. CHild's Nerv Syst 2:98–99

    Google Scholar 

  22. Wocjan J, Batorski L, Czosnyka M, et al (1989) Normal pressure hydrocephalus in children-the state of hypercompensation. In: Hoff JT, Betz AL (eds) Intracranial pressure 7. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 406–409

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Czosnyka, M., Batorski, L., Roszkowski, M. et al. Cerebrospinal compensation in hydrocephalic children. Child's Nerv Syst 9, 17–22 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00301929

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00301929

Key words

Navigation