Skip to main content
Log in

The indications and principles of correction of post-traumatic deformities

  • Review
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Résumé

Les cals vicieux post-traumatiques du rachis résultent le plus souvent d'un traitement orthopédique ou chirurgical inadapté. La douleur représente la principale indication d'un geste secondaire de reconstruction. A côté des formes principalement vertébrales, des formes avec implication neurologique peuvent se rencontrer en cas d'atteinte médullaire. Une atteinte neurologique secondaire ou un déficit neurologique progressif sont trés souvent associés à la persistance d'une compression médullaire ou à l'aggravation d'un cal vicieux (le plus souvent en cyphose). L'objectif du traitement chirurgical est de corriger la déformation, de réaxer le rachis et de restaurer sa stabilité. Il faut distinguer les atteintes primitives des atteintes secondaires car des lésions neurologiques supplémentaires peuvent être provoquées par une stratégie erronée, rendant nécessaire un geste neurochirurgical préalable ou simultané. L'objectif de nos mesures reconstructives qui visent à réaxer le rachis traumatisé tout en évitant l'atteinte des segments mobiles sains, ne peut presqu'exclusivement être réalisé que par une opération combinant les abords antérieur et postérieur. Les imperfections fondamentales proviennent du premier traitement. Dans le traitement primitif ou secondaire des lésions médullaires, on ne peut s'attendre à des résultats acceptables que si les facteurs suivants sont pris en considération: (1) identification préopératoire du type de lésion; (2) l'anatomie fonctionnelle du rachis (principes de la répartition des contraintes et du hauban); (3) maîtrise de toutes les voies d'abord (postérieures, postérolatérales et antérieures).

Summary

Post-traumatic malposition of the spine usually results in inadequate conservative treatment or in-correct surgical therapy. The main indication for secondary reconstructive measures in pain. Besides the predominant vertebragenic causes, neuropathic forms may be combined in spinal cord damage. Secondary neurological damage or progressive neurological deficits are combined with persistent spinal compression or increasing (mostly kyphotic) malpositions. The objective of the surgical treatment is to correct the malposition with reprofiling the spine and restoration of the stability of the axis organ. Attention must be paid to primary or secondary spinal lesions, since additional neurological lesions can be provoked when the strategy is wrong, and concomitant or prior neurosurgical interventions may become necessary. Almost exclusively, the objective of our reconstructive measures with reprofiling of the injured spine avoiding damage to healthy movement segments can be achieved only by a combined ventral and dorsal operation. The crucial shortcomings result from the first treatment. Acceptable treatment results can only be expected in both first and secondary treatment of spinal cord injuries when the following factors are taken into consideration: (1) pretherapeutic definition of the injury pattern; (2) the functional anatomy of the spine (load sharing and tension band principle); (3) mastery of all approaches (dorsal, dorsolateral, ventral) and the instrumentation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Aschoff A (1991) 3077 operations on syringomyelia. 60 own cases. Lecture. National Queen Square, London September

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bergmark A (1989) Stability of the lumbar spine — a study of mechanical engineering. Acta Orthop Scand 60 [Suppl 230]: 27–32

    Google Scholar 

  3. Beric A, Demitrijevic MR, Lindblom U (1988) Central dysesthesia syndrome in spinal cord injury patients. Pain 34:109–116

    Google Scholar 

  4. Böhm H, Harms J, Donk R, Zielke K (1990) Correction and stabilisation of ungular kyphosis. Clin Orthop 259:56–61

    Google Scholar 

  5. Burke DC, Woodward JM (1976) Pain and phantom sensation in spinal paralysis. In: Vinken PJ, Bruyn GW (eds) Handbook of clinical neurology, vol 26. North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp 489–499

    Google Scholar 

  6. Donovan WH, Dimitrijevic MR, Dahm L, Dimitrijevic M (1982) Neurophysiological approaches to chronic pain following spinal cord injury. Paraplegia 20:135–146

    Google Scholar 

  7. Edwards CC, Levine AM (1989) Complications associated withposterior instrumentation in the treatment of thoracic and lumbar injuries. In: Garfin S (ed) Complications of spine surgery. Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore, pp 201–219

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gertzbein SD (1990) Anterior surgery as the primary treatment of thoraco-lumbar fractures. Semin Spine Surg 2:31–34

    Google Scholar 

  9. Gertzbein SD (1992) Algorithm for the management of thoraco-lumbar fractures. In: Gertzbein SD (ed) Fractures of the thoracic and lumbar spine. Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore, pp 281–285

    Google Scholar 

  10. Harms J (1987) Klassifikation, der BWS- und LWS-Frakturen. Fortschr Med 105:545–548

    Google Scholar 

  11. Harms J, Böhm H (1990) Die operative Kyphosetherapie. In: Springorum H-W, Katthagen B-D (Hrsg) Aktuelle Schwerpunkte der Orthopädie. Thieme, Stuttgart New York, pp 74–82

    Google Scholar 

  12. Harms J, Stoltze D (1989) Die operative Behandlung der BWS- und LWS-Frakturen mit dem USI-System. In: Stuhler T (ed) Fixateur externe — Fixateur interne. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 18–27

    Google Scholar 

  13. Harms J, Stoltze D (1991) Posttraumatic syringomyelia. Diagnostic and therapeutical considerations. Workshop: 100 years Syrinx surgery, Heidelberg, FRG, December

  14. Jacobs RR, Asker MA, Snider RK (1980) Doros-lumbale Wirbelsäulenfrakturen — eine vergleichende Studie zwischen konservativer und operativer Behandlung bei 100 Patienten. Orthopädie 9:45–62

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kostiuk JP (1984) Anterior fixation for fractures of the thoraco-lumbar spine with and without neurological involvement. Clin Orthop 189:103–105

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kummer B (1991) Biomechanische Aspekte zur Instabilität der Wirbelsäule. In: Fuchs GA (ed) Die instabile Wirbelsäule. Thieme, Stuttgart, p 8

    Google Scholar 

  17. Latta L, Harms J, Böhm H (1991) Biomechanical studies of spinal instrumentation with Moss. Paper presented at the 1st Meeting of Moss Study Group. Cayman Islands

  18. Lonstein JE, Winter RE, Bradford DS, Moe JH, Bianco AJ (1976) Post-laminectomy spine deformity. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 58:727

    Google Scholar 

  19. Magerl F, Harms J, Gertzbein SD, Aebi M, Nazarian S (1990) A new classification of spinal fractures pesented at SICOT Meeting. Montreal, September 9

  20. Malcolm BW (1979) Spinal deformity secondary to spinal injury. Orthop Clin North Am 10:943

    Google Scholar 

  21. Malcolm BW, Bradford DS, Winter RB, Chou SN (1981) Post-traumatic kyphosis: a review of forty-eight surgically treated cases. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 63:891

    Google Scholar 

  22. Putz R (1989) Functional morphology of the lower lumbar spine. J Manual Med 4:2–6

    Google Scholar 

  23. Stoltze D (1991) Klassifikation and spezielle Therapie von Wirbelfrakturen. In: Fuchs GA (ed) Die instabile Wirbelsäule. Thieme, Stuttgart New York

    Google Scholar 

  24. Stoltze D, Harms J (1991) Zielke pedicle screw systems for thoracic and lumbar spine fractures. In: Bridwell KM, Dewald RL (eds) The textbook of spinal surgery, vol 1. Lippincott, Philadelphia, pp 991–1000

    Google Scholar 

  25. Stoltze D, Harms J, Brinkmann KE (1982) Der Wert der Computertomographie in der Indikationsbehandlung zur operativen Behandlung der Wirbelsäulenverletzungen. BH Unfallheilkd 158:309

    Google Scholar 

  26. Stoltze D, Phillippi R, Harms J (1986) Die Wertigkeit der Computertomographie und Myelographie für die Operationsindikation und-technik von Wirbelsäulenverletzungen. H Unfallheilkd 165:133

    Google Scholar 

  27. Stoltze D, Harms J, Winnerlein M, Nanassy A (1987) Operative Behandlung frischer Wirbelsäulenverletzungen mit Querschnittslähmung. H Unfallheilkd 189:657–660

    Google Scholar 

  28. Stoltze D, Harms J, Nanassy A (1992) Wertigkeit der Stabilität bei der Indikation zur operativen Behandlung von Verletzungen der Brust- und Lendenwirbelsäule. In: Zäch GA (ed) Rehabilitation. Springer, Berlin Heidelber New York

    Google Scholar 

  29. Vernon JD, Silver JR, Ohry A (1982) Posttraumatic syringomyelia. Paraplegia 20:339–364

    Google Scholar 

  30. Weinstein JN, Collato P, Lehmann TR (1988) Thoraco-lumbar “burst” fractures treated conservatively. A long term followup. Spine 13:33–38

    Google Scholar 

  31. White AA III, Panjabi MM, Thomas CL (1977) The clinical biomechanics of kyphotic deformities. Clin Orthop 128:8

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Harms, J., Stoltze, D. The indications and principles of correction of post-traumatic deformities. Eur Spine J 1, 142–151 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00301304

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00301304

Mots-clés

Key words

Navigation