Abstract
The effects of an antisiphon device (ASD) on shunt flow and intracranial pressure (ICP) in 16 children with hypertensive hydrocephalus were examined using quantitative radionuclide shuntography (99mTc) with the children in supine and sitting positions. The average age of these patients was 9.5 years. Results were compared with those recorded in 36 patients with adult normal-pressure hydrocephalus (NPH). The closing pressure levels of shunt valve used were low in 8 cases, medium in 7 and high in 1. Half the children (8) had shunt systems with, and the other 8 without, ASD. In the children who had the shunt system without ASD, sitting shunt flow was significantly greater than supine shunt flow, which indicated overdrainage. Conversely, in children who had the shunt system with ASD, supine shunt flow was greater than sitting shunt flow. Because ASD prevented overdrainage, ICP was higher with the shunt system with ASD than with the shunt system without ASD. Without ASD, sitting shunt flow of children was lower than that of adult patients with NPH because of the lower hydrostatic pressure, which correlated with their height. Conversely, in the presence of a shunt system with ASD, sitting shunt flow of children was greater than that of adults, because of the higher ICP and lower hydrostatic pressure. The effect of ASD was smaller in children than in adults, because positive pressure over the ASD was greater (hypertension vs normal pressure) and negative pressure under the ASD was less (short vs tall) in children than in adults. Thus, in children the ASD was effective in preventing overdrainage. An overfunction of the ASD, which has sometimes been observed in adult patients with NPH, was not encountered. The relationships among the function of the ASD and ICP, height and position of the ASD are discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Chiba Y, Tokoro K, Abe H (1991) Importance of anti-siphon devices in shunt therapy of pediatric and adolescent hydrocephalus. In: Matsumoto S, Tamaki N (eds) Hydrocephalus: pathogenesis and treatment. Springer, Tokyo Berlin Heidelberg, pp 375–382
Gruber R, Jenny P, Herzog B (1984) Experiences with the anti-siphon device (ASD) in shunt therapy of pediatric hydrocephalus. J Neurosurg 61:156–162
McCullough DC (1986) Symptomatic progressive ventriculomegaly in hydrocephalics with patent shunts and anti-siphon devices. Neurosurgery 19:617–621
Portnoy HD, Schulte RR, Fox JL, Croissant PD, Tripp L (1973) Anti-siphon and reversible occlusion valves for shunting in hydrocephalus and preventing post-shunt subdural hematomas. J Neurosurg 38:729–738
Seida M, Ito U, Tomida S, Yamazaki S, Inaba Y (1987) Ventriculoperitoneal shunt malfunction with anti-siphon device in normal-pressure hydrocephalus: report of three cases. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 27:769–773
Tokoro K, Chiba Y (1991) Optimum position for an antisiphon device in a cerebrospinal fluid shunt system. Neurosurgery 29:519–525
Tokoro K, Chiba Y, Abe H (1991) Pitfalls of Sophy programmable pressure valve: is it really better than a conventional valve and an anti-siphon device? In: Matsumoto S, Tamaki N (eds) Hydrocephalus: pathogenesis and treatment. Springer, Tokyo Berlin Heidelberg, pp 405–421
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tokoro, K., Chiba, Y., Abe, H. et al. Importance of anti-siphon devices in the treatment of pediatric hydrocephalus. Child's Nerv Syst 10, 236–238 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00301160
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00301160