Skip to main content

Results of lumbosacral distraction spondylodesis for the treatment of spondylolisthesis, failed-back syndrome, and lumbar instability

Résumé

Diverses méthodes de fusion lombo-sacrée sont utilisées dans le traitement des affections dégénératives rachidiennes. Les résultats sont très variables et dépendent de l'indicatio, du type de fusion, des implants et de la méthode d'évaluation. Par une analyse rétrospective clinique et radiologique après un délai postopératoire moyen de 3,9 mois, cette étude rend compte du résultat de la “spondylodèse lombo-sacrée en distraction” (LSDS) dans une série consécutive de 147 patients traités par arthrodèse pour spondylolisthésis, échec de la chirurgie lombaire ou instabilité lombaire. La LSDS consite en une greffe postéro-latérale associée à un greffon autologue cortico-spongieux en H enfoncé sous distraction entre les épineuses de L4 et de S1. Avec 81,0% de bons et excellents résultats, cette technique d'arthrodèse sans ostéosynthèse a montré ses meilleurs résultats dans le traitement des spondylolisthésis, tandis que dans les cas d'échec de la chirurgie lombaire ou d'instabilité lombaire il n'a donné que 62,3% des résultats excellents ou satisfaisants. Le taux de pseudarthroses était de 13,6% pour tout le groupe et l'on n'a pas trouvé de complications majeures comme une atteinte radiculaire, un déficit neurologique post-opératoire ou une sténose lombaire.

Summary

Various methods of lumbosacral fusions for the treatment of degenerative spinal diseases are used clinically. Results vary greatly depending on indication, type of fusion, implants, and method of evaluation. In a retrospective clinical and radiological examination after an average follow-up time of 3.9 years this study reports on the outcome of lumbosacral distraction spondylodesis (LSDS) in a consecutive series of 147 patients being fused for the treatment of spondylolisthesis, failed-back syndrome, or lumbar instability. LSDS consists of a posterolateral fusion together with an autologous corticocancellous H-graft wedged under distraction between the spinous processes of L4 and S1. With 81.0% good and excellent results this noninstrumented fusion technique showed the best outcome in patients with spondylolisthesis, while in cases with a failed-back syndrome or lumbar instability only 62.3% excellent to satisfying outcomes were noted. The rate of pseudarthrosis was 13.6% in the whole patient group; no major complications such as nerve root damage, postoperative neurological deficits, or spinal stenosis were found.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. Albee FH (1991) Transplantation of a portion of the tibia into the spine for pott's disease: a preliminary report. JAMA 57: 885–886

    Google Scholar 

  2. Barr JS, Riseborough EJ, Freeman PA (1963) Failed surgery for low back and sciatic pain. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 45: 1553–1559

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bosworth DM (1945) Clothespin graft of spine for spondylolisthesis and laminal defects. Am J Surg 67:61–67

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cloward RB (1985) Posterior lumbar interbody fusion updated. Clin Orthop 193:16–19

    Google Scholar 

  5. Dick W (1984) Innere Fixation von Brust-und Lendenwirbelfrakturen. In: Burri C, Harder F, Jäger M (eds) Aktuelle Probleme in Chirurgie und Orthopädie, vol. 28. Huber, Bern

    Google Scholar 

  6. Dick W (1987) The “fixateur interne” as a versatile implant for spine surgery. Spine 12:882–900

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hibbs RA (1911) An operation for progressive spinal deformities. New York Med J 93:1013–1016

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kelley JH, Voris DC, Svien HJ, Ghormley RK (1954) Multiple operations for protruded intervertebral discs. Proc Staff Meet Mayo Clin 29:546–550

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kluger P (1989) Das Fixateurprinzip an der Rumpfwirbelsäule — sein Einsatz beim kombinierten ventralen und dorsalen Eingriff. In: Stuhler T (ed) Fixateur externe—Fixateur interne. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 36–58

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kluger P, Gerner HJ (1986) Das mechanische Prinzip des Fixateur externe zur dorsalen Stabilisierung der Brust- und Lendenwirbelsäule. Unfallchirurg 12:68–79

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kluger P, Gerner HJ (1988) Klinische Erfahrungen mit dem Fixateur interne und seine Weiterentwicklung. In: Schulitz KP, Winkelmann W (eds) Die Wirbelsäule in Forschung und Praxis, vol. 107. Hippokrates, Stuttgart, pp 145–152

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kornblatt MD, Casey MP, Jacobs RR (1986) Internal fixation in lumbosacral spine fusion. Clin Orthop 203:141–150

    Google Scholar 

  13. Krag MH (1990) Biomechanics of transpedicle spinal fixation. In: Weinstein JN, Wiesel SW, (eds) The International Society for the Study of the Lumbar Spine (eds). The lumbar spine. Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 914–940

    Google Scholar 

  14. Krämer J (1984) Changes and measurement of height and angle in the lumbosacral region. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 103:112–114

    Google Scholar 

  15. Krämer J, Kolditz D, Schleberger R (1984) Lumbosacral distraction spondylodesis with autologous bone graft together with posterolateral fusion. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 103: 107–111

    Google Scholar 

  16. Lee CK, Langrana NA (1984) Lumbosacral spinal fusion. Spine 9:574–581

    Google Scholar 

  17. Macnab I, Dall D (1971) The blood supply of the lumbar spine and its application to the technique of intertransverse lumbar fusion. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 53:628–638

    Google Scholar 

  18. Möller J, Wittenberg RH, Steffen R, Krämer J (1991) Long-term results of lumbosacral distraction spondylodesis (LSDS). Abstracts of the 2nd Annual Meeting of the European Spine Society, Rome, pp 181–182

  19. Möller J, Wittenberg RH, Nolte LP, Hedtmann A, Steffen R (1992) Die lumbosakrale Distraktionsspondylodese beim Postdiskotomiesyndrom — Langzeitergebnisse und Biomechanik. In: Matzen K (ed) Wirbelsäulenchirurgie II. Thieme, Stuttgart, pp 190–201

    Google Scholar 

  20. Moon MS, Ok IY, Lee KS (1987) End results of posterolateral fusion in lumbosacral spine. J Korean Orthop Ass (Engl edn) 32:39–47

    Google Scholar 

  21. Nitzschke E, Nolte LP (1988) Ein Computer-Simulationsmodell zur Abbildung der Biomechanik verschiedener Fusionsformen der Lendenwirbelsäule. In: Schulitz KP, Winkelmann W (eds) Die Wirbelsäule in Forschung und Praxis, vol 107, Hippokrates, Stuttgart, pp 49–54

    Google Scholar 

  22. Nolte LP, Pingel T (1992) A plane nonlinear model of the human spine (in German). Z Biomed Technik (in press)

  23. Ölerud S, Karlström G, Sjöström L (1988) Transpedicular fixation of thoracolumbar vertebral fractures. Clin Orthop 227: 44–51

    Google Scholar 

  24. Oppel U, Beyer HK, Fett H, Hedtmann A (1989) Kernspintomographische Untersuchungen mit Kontrastmitteln beim Postdiscotomiesyndrom. Orthopäde 18:41–52

    Google Scholar 

  25. Rombold C (1966) Treatment of spondylolisthesis by posterolateral fusion, resection of the pars interarticularis and prompt mobilization of the patient. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 48:1282–1300

    Google Scholar 

  26. Roy-Camille R, Berteaux D (1976) Technique et résultats des ostéosynthèses du rachis lombaire par plaques postérueres vissées dans les pédicules vertebraux. Montpellier Chir 22:307–315

    Google Scholar 

  27. Roy-Camille R, Saillant G, Mazel C (1986) Internal fixation of the lumbar spine with pedicle screw plating. Clin Orthop 203: 7–17

    Google Scholar 

  28. Stauffer RN, Coventry MB (1972) Anterior interbody lumbar spine fusion. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 54:756–768

    Google Scholar 

  29. Stauffer RN, Coventry MB (1972) Posterolateral lumbar spine fusion. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 54:1195–1205

    Google Scholar 

  30. Waddell G, Kummel EG, Lotto WN (1979) Failed lumbar disc surgery and repeat surgery following industrial injuries. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 61:201–207

    Google Scholar 

  31. Watkins MB (1957) Posterolateral bone-grafting for fusion of the lumbar and lumbosacral spine. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 41:388–396

    Google Scholar 

  32. White AA, Panjabi MM (1990) Clinical Biomechanics of the Spine, 2nd edn. Lippincott, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  33. Wiltse LL, Rocchio PD (1975) Preoperative psychological tests as predictors of success of chemonucleolysis in the treatment of low back syndrome. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 57:478–483

    Google Scholar 

  34. Wiltse LL, Bateman G, Hutchinson RH, Nelson WE (1968) The paraspinal sacrospinalis-splitting approach to the lumbar spine. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 50:919–926

    Google Scholar 

  35. Wittenberg RH, Möller J, Steffen R (1990) Lumbosakrale Distraktionsspondylodese ohne Metallimplantat bei Spondylolisthesis. In: Matzen KA (ed) Wirbelsäulenchirurgie. Spondylolisthese. Thieme, Stuttgart, pp 196–202

    Google Scholar 

  36. Wittenberg RH, Shea M, Möller J, Steffen R, Jergas M (1992) Die Biomechanik der instrumentierten versus nicht instrumentierten Fusion beim Postdiscotomiesyndrom. In: Matzen K (ed) Wirbelsäulenchirurgie II Thieme, Stuttgart, pp 19–29

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Möller, J., Wittenberg, R.H., Nolte, L.P. et al. Results of lumbosacral distraction spondylodesis for the treatment of spondylolisthesis, failed-back syndrome, and lumbar instability. Eur Spine J 1, 117–124 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00300938

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00300938

Mots-clés

  • Rachis lombaire
  • Arthrodèse lombaire
  • Spondylolisthésis
  • Echec de la chirurgie lombaire
  • Biomécanique

Key words

  • Lumbar spine
  • Spinal fusion
  • Spondylolisthesis
  • Failed-back syndrome
  • Biomechanics