Skip to main content
Log in

Size and spacing of capercaillie leks in relation to social behavior and habitat

  • Published:
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Spring territories of 17 adult capercaillie (Tetrao urogallus L.) cocks were 10–79 ha in extent; they varied inversely in size with the relative proportion of mature forest within them. The number of resident cocks at leks increased with the amount of mature forest within a 1 km radius of each lek center. Leks in two areas (n=46) were regularly spaced with mean distances to nearest neighbors of 1.98 and 2.07 km, corresponding to the territorial space occupied by adult cocks of adjoining leks. In one area with intensive logging, interlek distance increased with decreasing amounts of mature forest between them. Spring home ranges of 18 adult females averaged 51.3 ha±8.2 SE. The spatial relationships did not fit recent models of interlek spacing based on female spacing behavior. Instead, the results suggested that spacing of leks may be related to the territorial requirements of males.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abrahamsen J, Jakobsen NK, Dahl E, Kalliola R, Wilborg L, Pāhlson L (1977) Naturgeografisk regioninndelning av Norden. Nordiska utredninger B 1977:34, Stockholm

  • Angelstam P (1983) Population dynamics of tetraonids, especially the black grouse, Tetrao tetrix L., in boreal forest. PhD thesis, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden

    Google Scholar 

  • Angelstam P, Jaarola M, Nordh N-E (1985) Are female black grouse Tetrao tetrix territorial? Ornis Fenn 62:124–129

    Google Scholar 

  • Ballard WP, Robel RJ (1974) Reproductive importance of dominant male greater prairie chickens. Auk 91:75–86

    Google Scholar 

  • Bendell JF, Elliott PW (1966) Habitat selection in blue grouse. Condor 68:431–446

    Google Scholar 

  • Boag DA (1976) Influence of changing grouse density and forest attributes on the occupancy of a series of potential territories by male ruffed grouse. Can J Zool 54:1727–1736

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradbury JW (1977) Lek mating behavior in the hammerheaded bat. Z Tierpsychol 45:225–255

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradbury JW (1981) The evolution of leks. In: Alexander RD, Tinkle DW (eds) Natural selection and social behavior. Chiron, New York, pp 138–169

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradbury JW, Gibson R (1983) Leks and mate choice. In: Bateson PPG (ed) Mate choice. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 109–138

    Google Scholar 

  • Brander RB (1967) Movements of female ruffed grouse during the mating season. Wilson Bull 79:28–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown D, Rothery P (1978) Randomness and local regularity of points in a plane. Biometrica 65:115–122

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark PJ, Evans FC (1954) Distance to nearest neighbor as a measure of spatial relationships in populations. Ecology 35:445–453

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellison LN (1973) Seasonal social organization and movements of spruce grouse. Condor 75:375–385

    Google Scholar 

  • Fretwell SD (1972) Populations in a seasonal environment. In: MacArthur RH (ed) Monographs in Population Biology 5, Princeton University Press, Princeton, pp 1–240

    Google Scholar 

  • Gullion GW (1967) Selection and use of drumming sites by male ruffed grouse. Auk 84:87–112

    Google Scholar 

  • Hannon SJ, Sopuck LG, Zwickel FC (1982) Spring movements of female blue grouse: evidence for socially induced delayed breeding in yearlings. Auk 99:687–694

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey MJ, Barbour RW (1965) Home range of Microtus ochrogaster as determined by a modified minimum area method. J Mammal 46:398–402

    Google Scholar 

  • Horzog PW, Boag DA (1978) Dispersion and mobility in a local population of spruce grouse. J Wildl Manag 42:853–865

    Google Scholar 

  • Hjorth I (1970) Reproductive behaviour in Tetraonidae, with special reference to males. Viltrevy 7:184–596

    Google Scholar 

  • Hjorth I (1982) Attributes of capercallie display grounds and the influence of forestry. Proc Int Symp on Grouse 2:26–35

    Google Scholar 

  • Hjorth I (1985) The distribution of capercaillie males on leks in relation to the forest structure of the recruiting area. Proc Int Symp on Grouse 3:217–235

    Google Scholar 

  • Jamieson IG, Zwickel FC (1983) Dispersal and site fidelity in blue grouse. Can J Zool 61:570–573

    Google Scholar 

  • Kielland-Lund J (1981) Die Waldgesellschaften SO-Norwegens. Phytocoenologia 9:53–250

    Google Scholar 

  • Larsen BB, Wegge P (1985) Habitat characteristics of territorial capercaillie cocks during the breeding season. Proc Int Symp on Grouse 3:236–246

    Google Scholar 

  • Larsen BB, Wegge P, Storaas T (1982) Spacing behaviour of capercaillie cocks during spring and summer as determined by radio telemetry. Proc Int Symp on Grouse 2:124–130

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis RA (1985) Use of space by territorial male blue grouse. Wilson Bull 97:97–101

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcum CL, Loftsgaarden DO (1980) A non-mapping technique for studying habitat preferences. J Wildl Manag 44:963–968

    Google Scholar 

  • Maxson SJ (1978) Spring home range and habitat use by female ruffed grouse. J Wildl Manag 42:61–71

    Google Scholar 

  • Moss R, Lockie J (1979) Infrasonic components in the song of the capercaillie, Tetrao urogallus. Ibs 121:95–97

    Google Scholar 

  • Oring LW (1982) Avian mating systems. In: Farner DS, King JR (eds) Avian Biology, vol VI. Academic, New York, pp 1–92

    Google Scholar 

  • Pirkola MK, Koivisto I (1970) The main stages of the display of the capercaillie and their phenology. Proc Int Congr Game Biol 8:177–184

    Google Scholar 

  • Rippin AB, Boag DA (1974) Recruitment to populations of male sharp-tailed grouse. J Wildl Manag 38:616–621

    Google Scholar 

  • Rolstad J (1984) Valg av leikhabitat host storfugl (Tetrao urogallus) i sør-øst Norge. Thesis, Agr University of Norway, Ås-NLH

  • Roth P, Nievergelt B (1975) Die Standorte der Balzplätze beim Auerhuhn, Tetrao urogallus. Ornithol Beob 72:101–112

    Google Scholar 

  • Seiskari P (1962) On the winter ecology of the capercaillie, Tetrao urogallus, and the black grouse, Lyrurus tetrix, in Finland. Pap Game Res 22:1–119

    Google Scholar 

  • Svedarsky WD (1979) Spring and summer ecology of female greater prairie chickens in northwestern Minnesota. PhD thesis, University of North Dakota, Grand Forks

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallestad R, Pyrah D (1974) Movement and nesting of sage grouse hens in central Montana. J Wildl Manag 38:630–633

    Google Scholar 

  • Wegge P (1982) Postscript: where the gaps are. Proc Int Symp on Grouse 2:254–255

    Google Scholar 

  • Wegge P (1984) Naturlig dødelighet gjennom året hos storfugl på Østlandet. Viltrapport 36:76–81

    Google Scholar 

  • Wegge P (1985) Spacing pattern and habitat use of capercaillie hens in spring. Proc Int Symp on Grouse 3:261–277

    Google Scholar 

  • Wegge P, Larsen BB (1987) Spacing of adult and juvenile capercaillie, Tetrao urogallus L., cocks during the breeding season. Auk (in press)

  • Wiley RH (1973) Territoriality and non-random mating in sage grouse, Centrocercus urophasianus. Anum Behav Monogr 6:85–169

    Google Scholar 

  • Winqvist T (1983) 100 tjäderspelplatser. Sveriges Skogsvårdsforbunds Tidsskr 81:4–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeimentz K (1974) Lebensraum und Bestandestendenz des Auerwildes in den Bayerischen Alpen. Allg Forstz 39:824–825

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wegge, P., Rolstad, J. Size and spacing of capercaillie leks in relation to social behavior and habitat. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 19, 401–408 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00300542

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00300542

Keywords

Navigation