Skip to main content
Log in

Dominance and reproductive behavior of wild house mice in a seminatural environment correlated with T-locus genotype

  • Published:
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Behavior of mice whose T-locus genotype was either +/+ or +/t was observed in a seminatural environment. Heterozygous females were less likely to be dominant, less likely to go into behavioral estrus, and less likely to become pregnant than were +/+ females. The relative fitness of +/t as compared with +/+ females was 0.32:1.00. In contrast, +/t males produced 35% more young than did +/+ males. The higher fitness of +/t males was primarily due to a greater production of young on the part of +/t as compared with +/+ subordinate males. Little evidence was found under these naturalistic conditions, of non-random mating with respect to T-locus genotype. The indication of overdominance for +/t males makes it unlikely that heterozygote disadvantage will be sufficient to account for the frequency of t-alleles in natural populations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Altmann J (1974) Observational study of behavior: sampling methods. Behaviour 49:227–267

    Google Scholar 

  • Bateman N (1960) Selective fertilization at the T-locus of the mouse. Genet Res 1:226–238

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett D (1975) The T-locus of the mouse. Cell 6:441–454

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett D (1978) Population genetics of T/t complex mutations. In: Morse H (ed) Origins of Inbred Mice Academic Press, New York, pp 615–632

    Google Scholar 

  • Braden AWH (1958) Influence of time of mating on segregation ratio of alleles at the T-locus in the house mouse. Nature 181:786–787

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruck D (1957) Male segregation ratio advantage as a factor in maintaining lethal alleles in wild populations of house mice. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 43:152–158

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox DR (1977) Analysis of binary data. Chapman and Hall, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewsbury DA (1978) The comparative method in studies in reproductive behavior. In: McGill TE, Dewsbury DA, Sachs BJ (eds) Sex and Behavior. Plenum Press, New York, pp 83–112

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunn LC (1960) Variations in the transmission ratios of alleles through egg and sperm in Mus musculus., Am Nat 94:385–393

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunn LC, Bennett D (1967) Maintenence of gene frequencies of a male sterile semi-lethal t-allele in a confined population of wild house mice. Am Nat 101:535–538

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunn LC, Levene H (1961) Population dynamics of a variant t-allele in a confined population of wild house mice. Evolution 15:385–393

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunn LC, Suckling J (1955) A preliminary comparison of the fertilities of wild house mice with and without a mutant a locus T. Am Nat 89:231–233

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunn LC, Beasley AB, Tinker H (1958) Relative fitness of wild house mice heterozygous for a lethal allele. Am Nat 92:215–230

    Google Scholar 

  • Egid K, Lenington S (1985) Responses of male mice to odors of females: Effects of T and H-2 locus genotype. Behav Gen 15:287–295

    Google Scholar 

  • Franks P (1984) Dominance and reproductive success of wild house mice in a seminatural environment. Unpubl Ph D Dissertation, Rutgers University NJ

  • Hammerberg G, Klein J (1975) Linkage relationships of markers on chromosome 17 of the house mouse. Genet Res 26:203–211

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartl DL (1970) A mathematical model for recessive lethal segregation distorters with differential viabilities in the sexes. Genetics 66:147–164

    Google Scholar 

  • Ivanyi P (1978) Some aspects of the H-2 system the Major Histocompatibility System in the mouse. Proc R Soc Lond B 202:117–159

    Google Scholar 

  • Ivanyi P, Hample R, Mickova M, Starka L (1976) The influence of the H-2 system on blood serum testosterone. Folia Biol Praha 22:42–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Johrston PG, Brown GH (1969) A comparison of the relative fitness of genotypes segregating for the t-allele in laboratory stock and its possible effects on gene frequency in the mouse populations. Am Nat 103:5–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleih J, Sipos P, Figueroa F (1984) Polymorphism of t-complex genes in European wild mice. Genet Res 44:39–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Lacy R (1978) Dynamics of t-alleles in Mus musculus populations: Review and speculation. The Biologist 60:41–47

    Google Scholar 

  • Larntz K (1978) Small-sample comparisons of exact levels for chi-squared goodness-of-fit statistics J Am Stat Ass 73:253–263

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenington S (1983) Social preferences for partners carrying “good genes” in wild house mice. Anim Behav 31:325–333

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenington S (in press) Phenotypic correlates of T-locus geno-type in wild mice: implications for evolutionary models. In: Komisaruk B, Seigal H (eds) JS Rosenblatt Festschrift

  • Lenington S, Egid K (1985) Female discrimination of male odors correlated with male genotype at the T-locus in Mus musculus: A response to T-locus or H-2 locus variability? Behav Genetics 15:37–51

    Google Scholar 

  • Levene L, Rockwell RC, Grossfield J (1980) Sexual selection in mice. V. Reproductive competition between +/+ and +/tw5 males. Am Nat 116:150–156

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin BR, Petras ML, Rassmussen DI (1969) The effect of migration on the maintenance of a lethal polymorphism in the house mouse. Am Nat 103:647–661

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewontin RC (1962) Interdeme selection controlling a polymorphism in the house mouse. Am Nat 96:65–78

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewontin RC (1968) The effect of differential viability on population dynamics of t-alleles in the house mouse. Evolution 22:262–273

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewontin RC, Dunn LC (1960) The evolutionary dynamics of a polymorphism in the house mouse. Genetics 45:705–722

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin PG, Andrewartha HG (1962) Success in fighting of two varietites of mice. Am Nat 96:375–376

    Google Scholar 

  • Pennycuik PR, Johnston PG, Lidicker WZ, Westwood NH (1978) Introduction of a male sterile allele (tw2) into a population of house mice housed in a large outdoor enclosure. Aust J Zool 26:69–81

    Google Scholar 

  • Petras ML (1967) Studies of natural populations of Mus II. Polymorphism at the T-locus. Evolution 21:466–478

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Franks, P., Lenington, S. Dominance and reproductive behavior of wild house mice in a seminatural environment correlated with T-locus genotype. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 18, 395–404 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00300513

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00300513

Keywords

Navigation