Abstract
During the 1970s, only about half of the adult American population wanted to allocate more money to education. But in the 1980s, almost two-thirds of those surveyed have wanted to spend more on education. Using the 1972–86 NORC General Social Surveys (of which there are a dozen replications — each with about 1500 respondents), this paper outlines the sources of this increase in support for educational spending. Over time, while education has been consistently given a higher priority by members of younger birth cohorts, and respondents educated beyond high school, racial differences have narrowed and regional differences have been reversed. In this decade, whites and non-Southerners are increasingly supportive of more spending on education than they were earlier. Finally, while rural/urban differences on education as a national spending priority have remained, this trend is less independent of larger social forces than the others. These results imply that to be most effective in producing increased allocations from public sources, educators and their political supporters should recognize those particular segments of the population who may be most responsive to calls for increased funding.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Bibliography
Davis, J. A.: 1974, ‘Concepts and procedures for constructing odd ratio models for causally ordered, multivariate contingency tables’, Studies in Social Change Since 1948. Volume I (February). Chicago: National Opinion Research Center Report 127A:35–92.
Davis, J. A.: 1975a, ‘Background characteristics of the U.S. adult population, 1952–1972, a survey-metric model’, Studies in Social Change Since 1948. Volume II (May). Chicago: National Opinion Research Center Report 127A:35–92.
Davis, J. A.: 1975b, ‘Communism, conformity, cohorts, and categories: American tolerance in 1954 and 1972–1973’, American Journal of Sociology 81, 491–513.
Davis, J. A.: 1976, ‘D systems: Analyzing contingency tables with linear flow graphs’, pp. 111–145 in D. R.Heise (ed.), Sociological Methodology, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Davis, J. A.: 1978, ‘Studying categorical data over time’, Social Science Research 7, 151–179.
Davis, J. A.: 1981, ‘The parental families of Americans in birth cohorts 1890–1955: A categorical, linear model estimated from the NORC general social survey’, Social Indicators Research 9, 395–454.
Elder, Glen H.Jr.: 1975, ‘Age differentiation and the life course’, Annual Review of Sociology 1, 165–190.
Evan, W. M.: 1959, ‘Cohort analysis of survey data’, Public Opinion Quarterly 38, 63–72.
Glenn, Norval D.: 1976, ‘Cohort analysts' futile quest: Statistical attempts to separate age, period, and cohort effects’, American Sociological Review 46, 900–904.
Glenn, Norval D.: 1980, ‘Values, attitudes, and beliefs’, in O.BrimJr. and J.Kagan (eds.), Constancy and Change in Human Development, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Glenn, Norval D.: 1981, ‘Age, birth cohorts, and drinking: An illustration of the hazards of inferring effects from cohort data’, Journal of Gerontology 36, 362–369.
Grizzle, J. E., Starmer, C. F., and Kock, G. C.: 1969, ‘The analysis of categorical data by linear models’, Biometrics 25, 489–504.
Hyman, H. H.: 1978, ‘A banquet for secondary analysts’, Contemporary Sociology 7, 545–549.
Mason, K. O., Winsborough, H. H., Mason, W. M., and Poole, K. W.: 1973, ‘Some methodological issues in cohort analysis of archival data’, American Sociological Review 38, 242–258.
Ryder, N. B.: 1965, ‘The cohort as a concept in the study of social change’, American Sociological Review 30, 843–861.
Smith, A. W.: 1985, ‘Cohorts, education, and the evolution of tolerance’, Social Science Research 14, 205–225.
Smith, T. W.: 1981, ‘Can we have confidence in confidence? Revisited’, in The Measurement of Subjective Phenomena, D. F.Johnson (ed.), Wash., DC: U. S. Government Printing Office.
Swafford, M.: 1980, ‘Three parametric techniques for contingency table analysis: A nontechnical commentary’, American Sociological Review 45, 664–690.
Taylor, D. G.: 1980, ‘Procedures for evaluating trends in public opinion’, Public Opinion Quarterly 44, 86–100.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Special thanks to Rodney Ito, Nelson Moore, and Deborah Sult for their assistance in the preparation of the figures and tables. Naturally, I bear sole responsibility for all findings, errors, and omissions.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Smith, A.W. Trends in public attitudes toward educational spending. Soc Indic Res 21, 159–173 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00300501
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00300501