Skip to main content
Log in

Idiothetic orientation of a wandering spider: Compensation of detours and estimates of goal distance

  • Published:
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The wandering spider Cupiennius salei Keys uses idiothetic orientation, i.e., memorized information about its own previous movements, to retrieve lost prey. Spiders, having been chased away from a prey fly, return to the capture site (the goal) over a distance of more than 75 cm even though all external orientation cues were precluded. This behavior and its sensory basis were examined by varying the proprioceptive and ‘motor command’ inputs to the memory and by ablating particular lyriform slit sense organs on the legs of the spider.

The success rate of returns to the goal after rectilinear chases over 6 discrete distances ranging from 20 cm to>41 cm declines with increasing distances. At distances>41 cm, more than 50% of the performances of intact spiders are nevertheless ‘successful’, in that the animals approach the capture site as close as 5 cm (or less).

Animals that have been operated on (lyriform organs on all femora destroyed) are much less successful even at short distances. The mean starting angles of the returns by intact spiders and by those operated on do not differ signficantly. ‘Walking error e n’ for each segment of the entire return path shows that intact animals deviate little from the ideal return route and correctly estimate the distance to the goal. The operated spiders tend to drift off the ideal return route, while their distance estimates remain largely accurate.

Returns after curvilinear chases through a semicircular corridor do not retrace the curved path; instead the spiders take a shortcut. Of all performances by intact and by control spiders (with sham operations) 85% are successful. By contrast, most of the 8 groups with sensory ablations have a success rate of less than 50%.

Compensation for the semicircular detours is not quite complete: the mean starting directions of returns are biased, pointing to the corridor, and the shape of many return paths reflects the curved corridor shape. Spiders with unilateral ablations of their femoral lyriform organs show low success rates only if the operated legs are on the inner curve perimeter during the chase, while their return parameters resemble those of the intact group in the reverse situation (operated legs on outer perimeter). These side-specific ablation effects, which are correlated with the geometrical situation existing while idiothetic information is gathered and memorized, suggest that the idiothetic memory depends at least partly on input from proprioceptors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barth FG, Libera W (1970) Ein Atlas der Spaltsinnesorgane von Cupiennius salei Keys. Chelicerata (Araneae). Z Morphol Tiere 68:343–369

    Google Scholar 

  • Barth FG, Seyfarth E-A (1971) Slit sense organs and kinesthetic orientation. Z Vergl Physiol 74:326–328

    Google Scholar 

  • Barth FG, Seyfarth E-A (1979) Cupiennius salei Keys. (Araneae) in the highlands of Central Guatemala. J Arachnol 7:255–263

    Google Scholar 

  • Batschelet E (1965) Statistical methods for the analysis of problems in animal orientation and certain biological rhythms. American Institute of Biological Science, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Dornfeldt K (1975) Eine Elementaranalyse des Wirkungsgefüges des Heimfindevermögens der Trichterspinne Agelena labyrinthica (Cl.). Z Tierpsychol 38:267–293

    Google Scholar 

  • Görner P (1958) Die optische und kinästhetische Orientierung der Trichterspinne Agelena labyrinthica (Cl.) Z Vergl Physiol 41:111–153

    Google Scholar 

  • Görner P (1973) Beispiele einer Orientierung ohne richtende Außenreize. Fortschr Zool 21:20–45

    Google Scholar 

  • Görner P, Zeppenfeld Ch (1980) The runs of Pardosa amentata (Araneae, Lycosidae) after removing its cocoon. Proc Int Congr Arachnol 8:243–248

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagen H-O v (1967) Nachweis einer kinästhetischen Orienticrung bei Ucarapax. Z Morphol Ökol Tiere 58:301–320

    Google Scholar 

  • Jander P (1970) Ein Ansatz zur modernen Elementarbeschreibung der Orientierungshandlung. Z Tierpsychol 27:771–778

    Google Scholar 

  • Melchers M (1963) Zur Biologie und zum Verhalten von Cupiennius salei (Keyserling), einer amerikanischen Ctenide. Zool Jahrb Abt Sys Ökol Geogr Tiere 91:1–90

    Google Scholar 

  • Mittelstaedt H (1978) Kybernetische Analyse von Orientierungsleistungen. In: Hauske G, Butenandt E (eds) Kybernetik '77. Oldenbourg, München Wien, pp 144–195

    Google Scholar 

  • Mittelstaedt H, Mittelstaedt M-L (1973) Mechanismen der Orientierung ohne richtende Außenreize. fortschr Zool 21:46–58

    Google Scholar 

  • Mittelstaedt M-L, Mittelstaedt H (1980) Homing by path integration in a mammal. Naturwissenschaften 67:566

    Google Scholar 

  • Rovner JS, Knost SJ (1974) Post-immobilization wrapping of prey by lycosid spiders of the herbaceous stratum. Psyche 81:398–415

    Google Scholar 

  • Seyfarth E-A (1980) Daily patterns of locomotor activity in a wandering spider. Physiol Entomol 5:199–206

    Google Scholar 

  • Seyfarth E-A, Barth FG (1972) Compound slit sense organs on the spider leg: Mechanoreceptors involved in kinesthetic orientation. J Comp Physiol 78:176–191

    Google Scholar 

  • Seyfarth E-A, Bohnenberger J (1980) Compensated walking of tarantula spiders and the effect of lyriform slit sense organ ablation. Proc Int Congr Arachnol 8:249–255

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Seyfarth, EA., Hergenröder, R., Ebbes, H. et al. Idiothetic orientation of a wandering spider: Compensation of detours and estimates of goal distance. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 11, 139–148 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00300103

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00300103

Keywords

Navigation