Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology

, Volume 23, Issue 2, pp 117–126 | Cite as

Reproduction by worker honey bees (Apis mellifera L.)

  • R. E. PageJr.
  • E. H. EricksonJr.


Genetic markers were used to study the reproductive behavior of worker honey bees. Five experiments were conducted that demonstrate the significance of worker reproduction. Biases were found in the egg-laying success of workers belonging to different subfamilies within queenless colonies, however, members of all subfamilies laid eggs. These biases were probably not a consequence of direct reproductive competition among subfamily members but most likely represent genetic variability for the timing of the onset of oviposition. Workers preferentially oviposit in drone-sized cells, demonstrating a caste-specific adaptation for oviposition behavior. Drone brood production is highly synchronous within colonies and can result in the production of more than 6000 drones before colonies die. Workers reproduce in queenright colonies but at a very low frequency.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Butler CG (1957) The control of ovary development in worker honeybees (Apis mellifera). Experientia 13:256–257Google Scholar
  2. Butler CG (1976) The honey-bee colony — life history. In: Dadant, Sons (eds) The hive and the honey bee. Dadant & Sons, Hamilton, Illinois, pp 39–74Google Scholar
  3. Butler CG, Fairey EM (1963) The role of the queen in preventing oogenesis in worker honeybees. J Apic Res 2:14–18Google Scholar
  4. Contel EPB, Kerr WE (1976) Origin of males in Melipona subnitida estimated from data of an isozymic polymorphic system. Genetica 46:271–277Google Scholar
  5. Crow JF, Kimura M (1970) An introduction to population genetics theory. Burgess Publishing, Minneapolis, MinnesotaGoogle Scholar
  6. Crozier RH (1979) Genetics of sociality. In: Herman HR (ed) Social insects, vol 1. Academic Press, New York, pp 223–286Google Scholar
  7. De Groot AP, Voogd S (1954) On the ovary development in queenless worker bees (Apis mellifica L.). Experientia 10:384–385Google Scholar
  8. Delaplane KS, Harbo JR (1987) Drone production by young versus old worker honeybees in queenless colonies. Apidologie: 18:115–120Google Scholar
  9. Evers CA, Seeley TD (1986) Kin discrimination and aggression in honey bee colonies with laying workers. Anim Behav 34:924–944Google Scholar
  10. Free JB, Williams IH (1974) Factors determining food storage and brood rearing in honeybee (Apis mellifera L.) comb. J Entomol [Am] 49:47–63Google Scholar
  11. Frumhoff PC, Schneider S (1987) The social consequences of honey bee polyandry: the effects of kinship on worker interactions within colonies. Anim Behav 35:255–262Google Scholar
  12. Fukuda H, Ohtani T (1977) Survival and life span of drone honeybees. Res Popul Ecol 19:51–68Google Scholar
  13. Hamilton WD (1964a) The genetical theory of social behavior, I. J Theor Biol 7:1–16Google Scholar
  14. Hamilton WD (1964b) The genetical theory of social behavior II. J Theor Biol 7:17–52Google Scholar
  15. Hamilton WD (1972) Altruism and related phenomena mainly in social insects. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 3:193–232Google Scholar
  16. Harbo JR (1976) The effect of insemination on the egg-laying behavior of honey bees. Ann Entomol Soc Am 69:1036–1038Google Scholar
  17. Jay SC, Nelson EV (1973) The effects of laying worker honeybees (Apis mellifera L.) and their brood on the ovary development of other worker honeybees. Can J Zool 51:629–632Google Scholar
  18. Kropáčová S, Haslbachová H (1969) The development of ovaries in worker honeybees in a queenright colony. J Apic Res 8:57–64Google Scholar
  19. Kropáčová S, Haslbachová H (1970) The development of ovaries in worker honeybees in queenright colonies examined before and after swarming. J Apic Res 9:65–70Google Scholar
  20. Kubišová S, Haslbachová H (1978) Effects of larval extracts on the development of ovaries in caged worker honeybees. Acta Ent Bohemoslov 75:9–14Google Scholar
  21. Kubišová S, Haslbachová H, Vrkoč J (1982) Effects of fractions of larval extracts on the development of ovaries in caged worker honey bees. Acta Ent Bohemoslov 79:334–340Google Scholar
  22. Metcalf RA (1980) Sex ratios, parent-offspring conflict, and local competition for mates in the social wasps Polistes metricus and Polistes variatus. Am Nat 116:642–654Google Scholar
  23. Metcalf RA, Whitt GS (1977) Intra-nest relatedness in the social wasp Polistes metricus: a genetic analysis. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 2:339–351Google Scholar
  24. Michener CD (1974) The social behavior of the bees: a comparative study. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MassachusettsGoogle Scholar
  25. Oster G, Eshel I, Cohen D (1977) Worker-queen conflict and the evolution of social insects. Theor Popul Biol 12:49–85Google Scholar
  26. Page RE (1986) Sperm utilization in social insects. Ann Rev Entomol 31:297–320Google Scholar
  27. Page RE, Metcalf RA (1984) A population investment sex ratio for the honey bee (Apis mellifera L.). Am Nat 124:680–702Google Scholar
  28. Perepelova L (1929) Laying workers, the ovipositing of the queens, and swarming. Bee Wld 10:69–71Google Scholar
  29. Ruttner F, Hesse B (1981) Rassenspezifische Unterschiede in Ovarentwicklung und Eiablage von weisellosen Arbeiterinnen der Honigbiene Apis mellifera L. Apidologie 12:159–183Google Scholar
  30. Sakagami SF (1954) Occurrence of an aggressive behavior in queenless hives, with considerations on the social organization of honeybee. Insectes Soc 1:331–343Google Scholar
  31. Sakagami SF (1958) The false-queen: fourth adjustive response in dequeened honeybee colonies. Behaviour 13:280–295Google Scholar
  32. Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1981) Biometry. Freeman, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  33. Trivers RL, Hare H (1976) Haplodiploidy and the evolution of the social insects. Science 191:249–263Google Scholar
  34. Tucker KW (1986) Visible mutants. In: Rinderer TE (ed) Bee Genetics and Breeding. Academic Press, Orlando, Florida, pp 57–87Google Scholar
  35. Velthuis HHW (1970) Ovarian development in Apis mellifera worker bees. Ent Exp & Appl 13:377–394Google Scholar
  36. Velthuis HHW (1985) The honeybee queen and the social organization of her colony. In: Hölldobler B, Lindauer M (eds) Experimental behavioral ecology and sociobiology. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MassachusettsGoogle Scholar
  37. Velthuis HHW, Verheijen FJ, Gottenbos AJ (1965) Laying worker honey bee: similarities to the queen. Nature (London) 207:1314Google Scholar
  38. Voogd S (1955) Inhibition of ovary development in worker bees by extraction fluid of the queen. Experientia 11:181–182Google Scholar
  39. Voogd S (1956) The influence of a queen on the ovary development in worker bees. Experientia 12:199–201Google Scholar
  40. Wilson EO (1971) The insect societies. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MassachusettsGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. E. PageJr.
    • 1
  • E. H. EricksonJr.
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of EntomologyThe Ohio State UniversityColumbusUSA
  2. 2.Carl Hayden Bee Research UnitUSDA-ARSTucsonUSA

Personalised recommendations