Skip to main content
Log in

Acoustic adaptation in pygmy marmoset contact calls: Locational cues vary with distances between conspecifics

  • Published:
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

  1. 1.

    The pygmy marmoset, Cebuella pygmaea, has four trill variants in its vocal repertoire. One of these trills has a different behavioral message from the other three. However, the remaining trills, which were physically different from each other, did not seem to differ in their behavioral messages.

  2. 2.

    The three trills can be ordered according to their acoustic cues for sound localization. This suggested that the most localizable trill is used when caller and recipient are far apart, while the least localizable trill is used only when animals are close together.

  3. 3.

    A field study in the Peruvian Amozon showed that this was correct. Thus, pygmy marmosets seem to use selectively the variations in trill structure to minimize locatability when other cues are available for determining location and to maximize locatability when other means of determining location are absent.

  4. 4.

    Pygmy marmoset trills contain mostly high frequency components which decay rapidly over short distances in humid, forested environments. However, these high frequencies are shown to be above the major frequencies of ambient noise in the environment, thus giving the pygmy marmoset a frequency window for communication. Furthermore, the frequencies of the marmoset trills are above the maximum auditory sensitivity of their major predators.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Brown CH (in press) Auditory localization and primate vocal behavior. In: Snowdon CT, Brown CH, Petersen MR (eds) Primate communication. Cambridge University Press, New York

  • Brown CH, Beecher MD, Moody DB, Stebbins WC (1979) Locatability of vocal signals in Old World monkeys: Design features for the communication of position. J Comp Physiol Psychol 93:806–819

    Google Scholar 

  • Cleveland J, Snowdon CT (in press) The complex vocal repertoire of adult cotton-top tamarins, Saguinus oedipus oedipus. Z Tierpsychol

  • Dooling RJ (1980) Behavior and psychophysics of hearing in birds. In: Popper AN, Fay RR (eds) Comparative studies of hearing in vertebrates. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 261–288

    Google Scholar 

  • Hafter ER (1977) Lateralization model and the role of time intensity tradings in binaural masking: Can the data be explained by a time-only hypothesis? J Acoust Soc Am 62:633–635

    Google Scholar 

  • Marler P (1959) Developments in the study of animal communication In: Bell PR (ed) Darwin's biological work. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 150–206

    Google Scholar 

  • Marten K, Marler P (1977) Sound transmission and its significance for animal vocalizations: I. Temperate habitats. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 2:271–290

    Google Scholar 

  • Marten K, Quine D, Marler P (1977) Sound transmission and its significance for animal vocalizations: II. Tropical forest habitats. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 2:291–302

    Google Scholar 

  • Menzel CR (1980) Headcocking and visual perception in primates. Anim Behav 28:151–159

    Google Scholar 

  • Morton ES (1975) Ecological sources of selection on avian sounds. Am Nat 108:17–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Moynihan M (1967) Comparative aspects of communication in New World primates. In: Morris D (ed) Primate ethology. Weiderfeld and Nicolson, London, pp 236–266

    Google Scholar 

  • Pola YV, Snowdon CT (1975) The vocalizations of pygmy marmosets (Cebuella pygmaea). Anim Behav 26:192–206

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramirez MF, Freese CH, Revilla J (1978) Feeding ecology of the pygmy marmoset, Cebuella pygmaea, in Northeastern Peru. In: Kleiman DG (ed) The biology and conservation of the callitrichidae. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC, pp 91–104

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmons JA (1973) The resolution of target range by echolocating bats. J Acoust Soc Am 54:157–173

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith WJ (1977) The behavior of communicating. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Snowdon CT (in press) Linguistic and psycholinguistic approaches to primate communication. In Snowdon CT, Brown CH, Petersen MR (eds) Primate communication. Cambridge University Press, New York

  • Snowdon CT, Cleveland J (1980) Individual recognition of contact calls by pygmy marmosets. Anim Behav 28:717–727

    Google Scholar 

  • Snowdon CT, Pola YV (1978) Interspecific and intraspecific responses to synthesized marmoset vocalizations. Anim Behav 26:192–206

    Google Scholar 

  • Soini P (in press) Cebuella pygmaea. In: Mittermeier RA, Coimbra-Filho R (eds) Ecology and behavior of neotropical primates, vol 2. Brasilian Academy of Sciences, Brasilia

  • Thurlow WR (1971) Audition In: Kling JW, Riggs LA (eds) Experimental psychology. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York, pp 223–259

    Google Scholar 

  • Vencl F (1977) A case of convergence in vocal signals between marmosets and birds. Am Nat 111:777–782

    Google Scholar 

  • Waser PM (1977) Sound localization by monkeys: A field experiment. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 2:427–431

    Google Scholar 

  • Waser PM, Waser MS (1977) Experimental studies of primate vocalization: Specializations for long-distance propagation. Z Tierpsychol 43:239–263

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiley RH, Richards DG (1978) Physical constraints on acoustic communication in the atmosphere: Implications for the evolution of animal vocalizations. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 3:69–94

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Snowdon, C.T., Hodun, A. Acoustic adaptation in pygmy marmoset contact calls: Locational cues vary with distances between conspecifics. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 9, 295–300 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00299886

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00299886

Keywords

Navigation